对于慢性疼痛的治疗,疼痛管理服务是比手术更划算的选择。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Pain and Headache Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1007/s11916-025-01359-2
Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Max Y Jin
{"title":"对于慢性疼痛的治疗,疼痛管理服务是比手术更划算的选择。","authors":"Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Max Y Jin","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01359-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of commentary: </strong>The number of facilities and physicians that offer pain management services has grown significantly since the 1970s. Despite the rise in prevalence of individuals with chronic pain during that time, interventional pain physicians remain underutilized. One reason why this may be the case is a large number of patients are referred directly to surgical specialists prior to being seen by an interventional pain physician. With the rising cost of healthcare, a shift away from surgical specialists and towards pain specialists as part of a multidisciplinary care team may help reduce the cost of care for chronic pain patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Through comparing the costs for patients with various types of chronic back pain, it was found that those who were treated by a pain physician rather than a surgeon saved up to over $8000 USD. Despite the cost benefits, it is important to recognize that healthcare disparities still exist which prevent patients from accessing interventional pain physicians. These disparities include patient location and insurance coverage. Overall, the treatment paradigm should start with non-invasive treatments, followed by minimally invasive procedures, with surgical interventions reserved as a last resort for when less invasive measures fail. Early incorporation of a multidisciplinary care team that includes chronic pain management services is critical for providing appropriate and cost-effective patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Management Services Can Be a Cost-Effective Option over Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Max Y Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-025-01359-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of commentary: </strong>The number of facilities and physicians that offer pain management services has grown significantly since the 1970s. Despite the rise in prevalence of individuals with chronic pain during that time, interventional pain physicians remain underutilized. One reason why this may be the case is a large number of patients are referred directly to surgical specialists prior to being seen by an interventional pain physician. With the rising cost of healthcare, a shift away from surgical specialists and towards pain specialists as part of a multidisciplinary care team may help reduce the cost of care for chronic pain patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Through comparing the costs for patients with various types of chronic back pain, it was found that those who were treated by a pain physician rather than a surgeon saved up to over $8000 USD. Despite the cost benefits, it is important to recognize that healthcare disparities still exist which prevent patients from accessing interventional pain physicians. These disparities include patient location and insurance coverage. Overall, the treatment paradigm should start with non-invasive treatments, followed by minimally invasive procedures, with surgical interventions reserved as a last resort for when less invasive measures fail. Early incorporation of a multidisciplinary care team that includes chronic pain management services is critical for providing appropriate and cost-effective patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01359-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01359-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论目的:自20世纪70年代以来,提供疼痛管理服务的设施和医生的数量显著增长。尽管在此期间,慢性疼痛患者的患病率有所上升,但介入性疼痛医生仍未得到充分利用。造成这种情况的一个原因可能是,大量患者在接受介入性疼痛医生治疗之前,直接被转介到外科专家那里。随着医疗保健成本的上升,从外科专家转向疼痛专家作为多学科护理团队的一部分,可能有助于降低慢性疼痛患者的护理成本。最近的研究发现:通过比较不同类型的慢性背痛患者的费用,发现那些由疼痛内科医生而不是外科医生治疗的患者节省了超过8000美元。尽管成本效益,重要的是要认识到,医疗差距仍然存在,阻止患者访问介入性疼痛医生。这些差异包括患者所在地和保险范围。总的来说,治疗模式应该从非侵入性治疗开始,然后是微创手术,当微创措施失败时,手术干预是最后的手段。早期纳入包括慢性疼痛管理服务的多学科护理团队对于提供适当和具有成本效益的患者护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain Management Services Can Be a Cost-Effective Option over Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Purpose of commentary: The number of facilities and physicians that offer pain management services has grown significantly since the 1970s. Despite the rise in prevalence of individuals with chronic pain during that time, interventional pain physicians remain underutilized. One reason why this may be the case is a large number of patients are referred directly to surgical specialists prior to being seen by an interventional pain physician. With the rising cost of healthcare, a shift away from surgical specialists and towards pain specialists as part of a multidisciplinary care team may help reduce the cost of care for chronic pain patients.

Recent findings: Through comparing the costs for patients with various types of chronic back pain, it was found that those who were treated by a pain physician rather than a surgeon saved up to over $8000 USD. Despite the cost benefits, it is important to recognize that healthcare disparities still exist which prevent patients from accessing interventional pain physicians. These disparities include patient location and insurance coverage. Overall, the treatment paradigm should start with non-invasive treatments, followed by minimally invasive procedures, with surgical interventions reserved as a last resort for when less invasive measures fail. Early incorporation of a multidisciplinary care team that includes chronic pain management services is critical for providing appropriate and cost-effective patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Mixed Pain Research Over Three Decades (1993-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis. Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Blocks for Pain Management Following Total Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review. The Current Status and Future Prospects of Intra-articular Injection Therapy for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review. Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review. A Systematic Review of Sacroiliac Joint Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma (Prp) and Stem Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1