对比增强乳房x线摄影对乳腺癌活检结果预测的放射学-临床模型。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.051
Chang Liu , Priya Patel MD , Dooman Arefan PhD , Margarita Zuley MD , Jules Sumkin DO , Shandong Wu PhD
{"title":"对比增强乳房x线摄影对乳腺癌活检结果预测的放射学-临床模型。","authors":"Chang Liu ,&nbsp;Priya Patel MD ,&nbsp;Dooman Arefan PhD ,&nbsp;Margarita Zuley MD ,&nbsp;Jules Sumkin DO ,&nbsp;Shandong Wu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>In the USA over 1 million breast biopsies are performed annually. Approximately 9.6% diagnostic exams were given Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ≥4A, most of which are 4A/4B. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) may improve biopsy outcome prediction for this subpopulation, but machine learning-based analysis of CEM is largely unexplored. We aim to develop a machine learning-based analysis of CEM using computer-extracted radiomics and radiologist-assessed descriptors to predict breast biopsy outcomes of BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This HIPPA-compliant, IRB-approved study included women in a single institution who had BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions and underwent CEM imaging prior to biopsy. Logistic regression models were built to predict biopsy outcomes using radiomics features and four radiologist-assessed qualitative descriptors. A cohort of 201 patients was used for model development/training, and an independent group of 86 patients were used as an internal test set. AUC was used to measure model’s performance. Positive predictive value (PPV) was assessed on subgroups of BI-RADS 4A or 4B lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Model AUC was 0.90 for radiomics, 0.81 for clinical descriptors and 0.88 for their combination. On patients with an initial BI-RADS 4A or 4B scores, model combining radiomics and clinical descriptors of pre-biopsy CEM increased PPV3 to 18% from the radiologist’s 6% for 4A patients, and to 25% from the radiologist’s 17% for 4B patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Machine learning models combining radiomics features and clinical descriptors on CEM can predict breast biopsy outcomes on women with BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 5","pages":"Pages 2438-2449"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Radiomic-Clinical Model of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Biopsy Outcome Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Chang Liu ,&nbsp;Priya Patel MD ,&nbsp;Dooman Arefan PhD ,&nbsp;Margarita Zuley MD ,&nbsp;Jules Sumkin DO ,&nbsp;Shandong Wu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>In the USA over 1 million breast biopsies are performed annually. Approximately 9.6% diagnostic exams were given Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ≥4A, most of which are 4A/4B. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) may improve biopsy outcome prediction for this subpopulation, but machine learning-based analysis of CEM is largely unexplored. We aim to develop a machine learning-based analysis of CEM using computer-extracted radiomics and radiologist-assessed descriptors to predict breast biopsy outcomes of BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This HIPPA-compliant, IRB-approved study included women in a single institution who had BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions and underwent CEM imaging prior to biopsy. Logistic regression models were built to predict biopsy outcomes using radiomics features and four radiologist-assessed qualitative descriptors. A cohort of 201 patients was used for model development/training, and an independent group of 86 patients were used as an internal test set. AUC was used to measure model’s performance. Positive predictive value (PPV) was assessed on subgroups of BI-RADS 4A or 4B lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Model AUC was 0.90 for radiomics, 0.81 for clinical descriptors and 0.88 for their combination. On patients with an initial BI-RADS 4A or 4B scores, model combining radiomics and clinical descriptors of pre-biopsy CEM increased PPV3 to 18% from the radiologist’s 6% for 4A patients, and to 25% from the radiologist’s 17% for 4B patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Machine learning models combining radiomics features and clinical descriptors on CEM can predict breast biopsy outcomes on women with BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2438-2449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224010390\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224010390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理和目的:在美国,每年有超过100万例乳房活检。约9.6%的诊断检查给予乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)≥4A,大部分为4A/4B。对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)可以改善该亚群的活检结果预测,但基于机器学习的CEM分析在很大程度上尚未被探索。我们的目标是开发一种基于机器学习的CEM分析,使用计算机提取的放射组学和放射科医师评估的描述符来预测BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C或5个病变的乳腺活检结果。材料和方法:这项符合hipa标准、经irb批准的研究纳入了来自一家机构的BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C或5个病变的女性,并在活检前进行了CEM成像。建立逻辑回归模型,使用放射组学特征和四个放射科医师评估的定性描述符来预测活检结果。采用201例患者为队列进行模型开发/训练,86例患者为独立组作为内部测试集。使用AUC来衡量模型的性能。对BI-RADS 4A或4B病变亚组进行阳性预测值(PPV)评估。结果:放射组学模型AUC为0.90,临床描述符模型AUC为0.81,两者联合模型AUC为0.88。对于初始BI-RADS评分为4A或4B的患者,结合放射组学和活检前CEM临床描述的模型将PPV3从放射科医生的4A患者的6%增加到18%,从放射科医生的4B患者的17%增加到25%。结论:结合放射组学特征和CEM临床描述符的机器学习模型可以预测BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C或5个病变的女性乳腺活检结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Radiomic-Clinical Model of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Biopsy Outcome Prediction

Rationale and Objectives

In the USA over 1 million breast biopsies are performed annually. Approximately 9.6% diagnostic exams were given Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ≥4A, most of which are 4A/4B. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) may improve biopsy outcome prediction for this subpopulation, but machine learning-based analysis of CEM is largely unexplored. We aim to develop a machine learning-based analysis of CEM using computer-extracted radiomics and radiologist-assessed descriptors to predict breast biopsy outcomes of BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions.

Materials and Methods

This HIPPA-compliant, IRB-approved study included women in a single institution who had BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions and underwent CEM imaging prior to biopsy. Logistic regression models were built to predict biopsy outcomes using radiomics features and four radiologist-assessed qualitative descriptors. A cohort of 201 patients was used for model development/training, and an independent group of 86 patients were used as an internal test set. AUC was used to measure model’s performance. Positive predictive value (PPV) was assessed on subgroups of BI-RADS 4A or 4B lesions.

Results

Model AUC was 0.90 for radiomics, 0.81 for clinical descriptors and 0.88 for their combination. On patients with an initial BI-RADS 4A or 4B scores, model combining radiomics and clinical descriptors of pre-biopsy CEM increased PPV3 to 18% from the radiologist’s 6% for 4A patients, and to 25% from the radiologist’s 17% for 4B patients.

Conclusion

Machine learning models combining radiomics features and clinical descriptors on CEM can predict breast biopsy outcomes on women with BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C or 5 lesions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
The Leadership Ceiling in Global Radiology: A 2024-2026 High-Throughput Algorithmic Audit of Gender Representation in Senior Authorship. Innovative Responses to Escalating RVU Pressures in Radiology. Injuries to the Craniocervical Junction: A 3D Approach to Resident Education for Radiological Imaging. Multiparametric MRI Radiomics-Based Interpretable Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer. Multimodal Imaging of Tau Pathology and Network Connectivity Dynamics Across the Alzheimer's Continuum: A Pilot Study Using Second-Generation Tracer [18F]MK6240.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1