榛子口服免疫疗法对榛子脱敏,但对其他树坚果过敏无效(坚果饼干研究)。

Arnon Elizur, Yael Koren, Michael Y Appel, Liat Nachshon, Michael B Levy, Naama Epstein-Rigbi, Lars Mattsson, Marie Holmqvist, Jonas Lidholm, Michael R Goldberg
{"title":"榛子口服免疫疗法对榛子脱敏,但对其他树坚果过敏无效(坚果饼干研究)。","authors":"Arnon Elizur, Yael Koren, Michael Y Appel, Liat Nachshon, Michael B Levy, Naama Epstein-Rigbi, Lars Mattsson, Marie Holmqvist, Jonas Lidholm, Michael R Goldberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for hazelnut allergy is limited and its potential to cross-desensitize for other nuts is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the efficacy and safety of hazelnut OIT in desensitizing to hazelnut and additional tree nuts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of 30 hazelnut-allergic patients aged 4 years or older who underwent hazelnut OIT. Full desensitization (4,000 mg protein) rates were compared with those of 14 observational controls, and immunologic changes during OIT were measured. We determined cross-desensitization in cases of walnut and cashew co-allergy (n = 12). Inhibition of IgE binding to walnut by hazelnut was evaluated by ELISA in a separate set of dual walnut-hazelnut allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of full hazelnut desensitization following OIT was 96.7% (29 of 30 patients) compared with 14.3% (two of 14) in controls (odds ratio = 25.7; 95% CI, 3.7-178.7; P < .001). Five patients (16.7%) were treated with injectable epinephrine for home reactions. Hazelnut skin prick test and specific IgE to hazelnut and its main components, Cor a 9, 14 and 16, decreased whereas specific IgG<sub>4</sub> increased during OIT. A maintenance dose of 1,200 mg hazelnut protein was sufficient to maintain full desensitization. No cross-desensitization was noted in dual hazelnut-cashew allergic patients (n = 6). In dual hazelnut-walnut allergic patients, an increase in the walnut eliciting dose was observed in two of six patients (33.2%) (to 1,200 and 4,200 mg, respectively). Similarly, by cross-inhibition ELISA, hazelnut competed for IgE-binding to walnut in five of 25 (20%) hazelnut-walnut co-allergic patients (20%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hazelnut OIT is highly effective, with a safety profile similar to that of OIT to other nuts. Cross-desensitization to walnut and cashew is unlikely.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hazelnut Oral Immunotherapy Desensitizes Hazelnut But Not Other Tree Nut Allergies (Nut CRACKER Study).\",\"authors\":\"Arnon Elizur, Yael Koren, Michael Y Appel, Liat Nachshon, Michael B Levy, Naama Epstein-Rigbi, Lars Mattsson, Marie Holmqvist, Jonas Lidholm, Michael R Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for hazelnut allergy is limited and its potential to cross-desensitize for other nuts is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the efficacy and safety of hazelnut OIT in desensitizing to hazelnut and additional tree nuts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of 30 hazelnut-allergic patients aged 4 years or older who underwent hazelnut OIT. Full desensitization (4,000 mg protein) rates were compared with those of 14 observational controls, and immunologic changes during OIT were measured. We determined cross-desensitization in cases of walnut and cashew co-allergy (n = 12). Inhibition of IgE binding to walnut by hazelnut was evaluated by ELISA in a separate set of dual walnut-hazelnut allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of full hazelnut desensitization following OIT was 96.7% (29 of 30 patients) compared with 14.3% (two of 14) in controls (odds ratio = 25.7; 95% CI, 3.7-178.7; P < .001). Five patients (16.7%) were treated with injectable epinephrine for home reactions. Hazelnut skin prick test and specific IgE to hazelnut and its main components, Cor a 9, 14 and 16, decreased whereas specific IgG<sub>4</sub> increased during OIT. A maintenance dose of 1,200 mg hazelnut protein was sufficient to maintain full desensitization. No cross-desensitization was noted in dual hazelnut-cashew allergic patients (n = 6). In dual hazelnut-walnut allergic patients, an increase in the walnut eliciting dose was observed in two of six patients (33.2%) (to 1,200 and 4,200 mg, respectively). Similarly, by cross-inhibition ELISA, hazelnut competed for IgE-binding to walnut in five of 25 (20%) hazelnut-walnut co-allergic patients (20%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hazelnut OIT is highly effective, with a safety profile similar to that of OIT to other nuts. Cross-desensitization to walnut and cashew is unlikely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关榛子过敏的口服免疫疗法(OIT)数据有限,而且其对其他坚果交叉致敏的可能性尚不清楚:有关口服免疫疗法(OIT)治疗榛子过敏的数据很有限,而且这种疗法对其他坚果的交叉脱敏潜力尚不清楚:研究榛子口服免疫疗法对榛子和其他树坚果脱敏的有效性和安全性:前瞻性观察研究:30 名年龄≥4 岁的榛子过敏患者接受了榛子 OIT。将完全脱敏率(4000 毫克蛋白质)与 14 个观察对照组进行比较,并测量 OIT 期间的免疫学变化。对核桃和腰果共同过敏的病例(12 人)进行了交叉脱敏测定。在另一组核桃-榛子双重过敏患者中,通过 ELISA 评估了榛子对核桃 IgE 结合的抑制作用:结果:OIT 后榛子完全脱敏率为 96.7%(29/30),而对照组为 14.3%(2/14)(OR=25.7,95% CI 3.7-178.7,p 结论:榛子 OIT 非常有效,其安全性与其他坚果的 OIT 相似。对核桃和腰果交叉脱敏的可能性不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hazelnut Oral Immunotherapy Desensitizes Hazelnut But Not Other Tree Nut Allergies (Nut CRACKER Study).

Background: Data on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for hazelnut allergy is limited and its potential to cross-desensitize for other nuts is unknown.

Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of hazelnut OIT in desensitizing to hazelnut and additional tree nuts.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 30 hazelnut-allergic patients aged 4 years or older who underwent hazelnut OIT. Full desensitization (4,000 mg protein) rates were compared with those of 14 observational controls, and immunologic changes during OIT were measured. We determined cross-desensitization in cases of walnut and cashew co-allergy (n = 12). Inhibition of IgE binding to walnut by hazelnut was evaluated by ELISA in a separate set of dual walnut-hazelnut allergic patients.

Results: The rate of full hazelnut desensitization following OIT was 96.7% (29 of 30 patients) compared with 14.3% (two of 14) in controls (odds ratio = 25.7; 95% CI, 3.7-178.7; P < .001). Five patients (16.7%) were treated with injectable epinephrine for home reactions. Hazelnut skin prick test and specific IgE to hazelnut and its main components, Cor a 9, 14 and 16, decreased whereas specific IgG4 increased during OIT. A maintenance dose of 1,200 mg hazelnut protein was sufficient to maintain full desensitization. No cross-desensitization was noted in dual hazelnut-cashew allergic patients (n = 6). In dual hazelnut-walnut allergic patients, an increase in the walnut eliciting dose was observed in two of six patients (33.2%) (to 1,200 and 4,200 mg, respectively). Similarly, by cross-inhibition ELISA, hazelnut competed for IgE-binding to walnut in five of 25 (20%) hazelnut-walnut co-allergic patients (20%).

Conclusions: Hazelnut OIT is highly effective, with a safety profile similar to that of OIT to other nuts. Cross-desensitization to walnut and cashew is unlikely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Toddlers: Open-Label Extension to EPITOPE. Profiling blood hypereosinophilia in patients on dupilumab treatment for respiratory conditions: a real-life snapshot. α1-Antitrypsin Gene Variation Associates with Asthma Exacerbations and Related Health Care Utilization. Anti-IL-5 treatment reduces infection-related adverse events: A meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials. Demography and baseline characteristics of individuals planned for Jack Jumper Ant-specific venom Immunotherapy at the Victorian Insect Venom Allergy Service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1