角膜后部手术引起的散光对散光眼内透镜功率计算的影响。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S488571
Stephen Stewart, Tun Kuan Yeo, Salissou Moutari, Richard N McNeely, Jonathan E Moore
{"title":"角膜后部手术引起的散光对散光眼内透镜功率计算的影响。","authors":"Stephen Stewart, Tun Kuan Yeo, Salissou Moutari, Richard N McNeely, Jonathan E Moore","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S488571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine whether accounting for posterior corneal surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) would improve toric intraocular lens power calculation prediction error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 189 eyes of 148 patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were included in the study. Standard and posterior keratometry were measured pre- and postoperatively. Centroid SIA with standard keratometry and posterior keratometry were calculated separately. Prediction errors for postoperative refractive astigmatism at 4 weeks postoperatively were compared for Barrett Toric with predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (PPCA); Barrett Toric with preoperative measured posterior corneal astigmatism (MPCA); Barrett Toric with postoperative MPCA, which accounts for posterior corneal SIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant increase in PCA magnitude postoperatively (p < 0.001), although a change of >0.3D occurred in only 3% of eyes. There was a postoperative rotation in the steep meridian of >10° in 32% of eyes. The Barrett Toric formula with PPCA yielded a significantly smaller refractive astigmatism prediction error compared to when a postoperative MPCA value was used (p < 0.01). Postoperative MPCA had a lower proportion of eyes within 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00D of predicted refractive astigmatism than PPCA or preoperative MPCA, although this was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated postoperative changes in posterior corneal astigmatism magnitude and the orientation of the steep meridian. However, accounting for posterior keratometric SIA in the Barrett Toric formula does not improve refractive astigmatism prediction accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Posterior Corneal Surgically Induced Astigmatism on Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculations.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Stewart, Tun Kuan Yeo, Salissou Moutari, Richard N McNeely, Jonathan E Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S488571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine whether accounting for posterior corneal surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) would improve toric intraocular lens power calculation prediction error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 189 eyes of 148 patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were included in the study. Standard and posterior keratometry were measured pre- and postoperatively. Centroid SIA with standard keratometry and posterior keratometry were calculated separately. Prediction errors for postoperative refractive astigmatism at 4 weeks postoperatively were compared for Barrett Toric with predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (PPCA); Barrett Toric with preoperative measured posterior corneal astigmatism (MPCA); Barrett Toric with postoperative MPCA, which accounts for posterior corneal SIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant increase in PCA magnitude postoperatively (p < 0.001), although a change of >0.3D occurred in only 3% of eyes. There was a postoperative rotation in the steep meridian of >10° in 32% of eyes. The Barrett Toric formula with PPCA yielded a significantly smaller refractive astigmatism prediction error compared to when a postoperative MPCA value was used (p < 0.01). Postoperative MPCA had a lower proportion of eyes within 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00D of predicted refractive astigmatism than PPCA or preoperative MPCA, although this was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated postoperative changes in posterior corneal astigmatism magnitude and the orientation of the steep meridian. However, accounting for posterior keratometric SIA in the Barrett Toric formula does not improve refractive astigmatism prediction accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"35-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721498/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S488571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S488571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:确定考虑后角膜手术性散光(SIA)是否会改善环形人工晶状体度数计算预测误差。方法:对148例常规白内障手术患者189只眼进行研究。术前和术后分别测量标准角膜和后角膜。质心SIA分别计算标准角膜测量和后验角膜测量。比较Barrett Toric与预测后角膜散光(PPCA)的术后4周屈光性散光预测误差;Barrett Toric与术前测量角膜后散光(MPCA);Barrett Toric与术后MPCA,这说明了角膜后SIA。结果:虽然只有3%的眼睛发生了>.3 3d的变化,但术后PCA强度明显增加(p < 0.001)。术后32%的眼睛在bbb10°陡经络处出现旋转。与术后使用MPCA值相比,使用Barrett Toric公式预测屈光散光的误差明显更小(p < 0.01)。术后MPCA预测屈光散光在0.50、0.75和1.00D范围内的眼睛比例低于PPCA或术前MPCA,但差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究证实了术后角膜后散光大小和陡经络方向的变化。然而,在Barrett Toric公式中考虑后角测量SIA并不能提高屈光散光预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Posterior Corneal Surgically Induced Astigmatism on Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculations.

Background: To determine whether accounting for posterior corneal surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) would improve toric intraocular lens power calculation prediction error.

Methods: A total of 189 eyes of 148 patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were included in the study. Standard and posterior keratometry were measured pre- and postoperatively. Centroid SIA with standard keratometry and posterior keratometry were calculated separately. Prediction errors for postoperative refractive astigmatism at 4 weeks postoperatively were compared for Barrett Toric with predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (PPCA); Barrett Toric with preoperative measured posterior corneal astigmatism (MPCA); Barrett Toric with postoperative MPCA, which accounts for posterior corneal SIA.

Results: There was a significant increase in PCA magnitude postoperatively (p < 0.001), although a change of >0.3D occurred in only 3% of eyes. There was a postoperative rotation in the steep meridian of >10° in 32% of eyes. The Barrett Toric formula with PPCA yielded a significantly smaller refractive astigmatism prediction error compared to when a postoperative MPCA value was used (p < 0.01). Postoperative MPCA had a lower proportion of eyes within 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00D of predicted refractive astigmatism than PPCA or preoperative MPCA, although this was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated postoperative changes in posterior corneal astigmatism magnitude and the orientation of the steep meridian. However, accounting for posterior keratometric SIA in the Barrett Toric formula does not improve refractive astigmatism prediction accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1