Jinhao Liao, Linjie Wang, Lian Duan, Fengying Gong, Huijuan Zhu, Hui Pan, Hongbo Yang
{"title":"糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者的估计葡萄糖处置率与心血管疾病之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Jinhao Liao, Linjie Wang, Lian Duan, Fengying Gong, Huijuan Zhu, Hui Pan, Hongbo Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12933-024-02570-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance proxy indicators are significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. However, the correlations between the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) index and CVD and its subtypes have yet to be thoroughly researched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10,690 respondents with diabetes and prediabetes from the NHANES 1999-2016 were enrolled in the study. Three machine learning methods (SVM-RFE, XGBoost, and Boruta algorithms) were employed to select the most critical variables. Logistic regression models were established to evaluate the association between eGDR and CVD. We applied ROC curves, C-statistics, NRI, IDI, calibration curves, and DCA curves to assess model performance. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the association among different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the higher quartile showed a decreased prevalence of CVD. Multivariate logistic regression models and RCS curves demonstrated that eGDR had an independently negative linear correlation with the likelihood of CVD[Q4 vs. Q1: OR 0.24(0.18,0.32)], CAD[OR 0.81(0.78,0.85)], CHF[OR 0.81(0.76,0.86)], and stroke[0.85(0.80,0.90)]. Model evaluation showed better performance in fully adjusted models than basic models[C-statistics(Model 3 vs. Model 1): CVD(0.683 vs. 0.814), CAD(0.672 vs. 0.807), CHF(0.714 vs. 0.839) and stroke(0.660 vs. 0.790)]. The AUCs of eGDR were significantly higher than the values of other IR surrogates in the unadjusted models, and slightly higher in the fully adjusted models. Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower eGDR was significantly associated with a heightened likelihood of CVD and its subtypes in diabetic and prediabetic populations. And eGDR exhibited better performance in evaluating the associations compared to other IR proxies encompassing TyG, HOMA-IR, QCUIKI, METS-IR, etc.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between estimated glucose disposal rate and cardiovascular diseases in patients with diabetes or prediabetes: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Jinhao Liao, Linjie Wang, Lian Duan, Fengying Gong, Huijuan Zhu, Hui Pan, Hongbo Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12933-024-02570-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance proxy indicators are significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. However, the correlations between the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) index and CVD and its subtypes have yet to be thoroughly researched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10,690 respondents with diabetes and prediabetes from the NHANES 1999-2016 were enrolled in the study. Three machine learning methods (SVM-RFE, XGBoost, and Boruta algorithms) were employed to select the most critical variables. Logistic regression models were established to evaluate the association between eGDR and CVD. We applied ROC curves, C-statistics, NRI, IDI, calibration curves, and DCA curves to assess model performance. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the association among different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the higher quartile showed a decreased prevalence of CVD. Multivariate logistic regression models and RCS curves demonstrated that eGDR had an independently negative linear correlation with the likelihood of CVD[Q4 vs. Q1: OR 0.24(0.18,0.32)], CAD[OR 0.81(0.78,0.85)], CHF[OR 0.81(0.76,0.86)], and stroke[0.85(0.80,0.90)]. Model evaluation showed better performance in fully adjusted models than basic models[C-statistics(Model 3 vs. Model 1): CVD(0.683 vs. 0.814), CAD(0.672 vs. 0.807), CHF(0.714 vs. 0.839) and stroke(0.660 vs. 0.790)]. The AUCs of eGDR were significantly higher than the values of other IR surrogates in the unadjusted models, and slightly higher in the fully adjusted models. Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower eGDR was significantly associated with a heightened likelihood of CVD and its subtypes in diabetic and prediabetic populations. And eGDR exhibited better performance in evaluating the associations compared to other IR proxies encompassing TyG, HOMA-IR, QCUIKI, METS-IR, etc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730478/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02570-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02570-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胰岛素抵抗代理指标与心血管疾病(CVD)和糖尿病有显著相关性。然而,葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)指数与CVD及其亚型之间的相关性尚待深入研究。方法:从1999-2016年NHANES中纳入10,690名糖尿病和前驱糖尿病患者。采用三种机器学习方法(SVM-RFE、XGBoost和Boruta算法)选择最关键的变量。建立Logistic回归模型评价eGDR与CVD之间的关系。我们应用ROC曲线、C-statistics、NRI、IDI、校准曲线和DCA曲线来评估模型的性能。进行亚组分析,探讨不同亚组间的相关性。结果:高四分位数的参与者心血管疾病患病率降低。多因素logistic回归模型和RCS曲线显示,eGDR与CVD[Q4 vs. Q1: OR 0.24(0.18,0.32)]、CAD[OR 0.81(0.78,0.85)]、CHF[OR 0.81(0.76,0.86)]和卒中[0.85(0.80,0.90)]的可能性呈独立负线性相关。模型评价显示,完全调整模型的性能优于基本模型[c统计量(模型3 vs模型1):心血管疾病(0.683 vs 0.814)、CAD(0.672 vs 0.807)、瑞士法郎(0.714 vs 0.839)和卒中(0.660 vs 0.790)]。在未调整模型中,eGDR的auc显著高于其他IR替代值,在完全调整模型中略高。亚组分析表明,结果是稳健的。结论:在糖尿病和糖尿病前期人群中,较低的eGDR与CVD及其亚型的可能性增加显著相关。与TyG、HOMA-IR、QCUIKI、METS-IR等其他IR指标相比,eGDR在评估相关性方面表现更好。
Association between estimated glucose disposal rate and cardiovascular diseases in patients with diabetes or prediabetes: a cross-sectional study.
Background: Insulin resistance proxy indicators are significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. However, the correlations between the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) index and CVD and its subtypes have yet to be thoroughly researched.
Methods: 10,690 respondents with diabetes and prediabetes from the NHANES 1999-2016 were enrolled in the study. Three machine learning methods (SVM-RFE, XGBoost, and Boruta algorithms) were employed to select the most critical variables. Logistic regression models were established to evaluate the association between eGDR and CVD. We applied ROC curves, C-statistics, NRI, IDI, calibration curves, and DCA curves to assess model performance. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the association among different subgroups.
Results: Participants in the higher quartile showed a decreased prevalence of CVD. Multivariate logistic regression models and RCS curves demonstrated that eGDR had an independently negative linear correlation with the likelihood of CVD[Q4 vs. Q1: OR 0.24(0.18,0.32)], CAD[OR 0.81(0.78,0.85)], CHF[OR 0.81(0.76,0.86)], and stroke[0.85(0.80,0.90)]. Model evaluation showed better performance in fully adjusted models than basic models[C-statistics(Model 3 vs. Model 1): CVD(0.683 vs. 0.814), CAD(0.672 vs. 0.807), CHF(0.714 vs. 0.839) and stroke(0.660 vs. 0.790)]. The AUCs of eGDR were significantly higher than the values of other IR surrogates in the unadjusted models, and slightly higher in the fully adjusted models. Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were robust.
Conclusion: A lower eGDR was significantly associated with a heightened likelihood of CVD and its subtypes in diabetic and prediabetic populations. And eGDR exhibited better performance in evaluating the associations compared to other IR proxies encompassing TyG, HOMA-IR, QCUIKI, METS-IR, etc.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.