{"title":"紫杉醇加西妥昔单抗与纳沃单抗治疗铂难治复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌:回顾性分析","authors":"Hiroyuki Kodama, Shigenori Kadowaki, Yasunobu Ishizuka, Munehiro Wakabayashi, Tomoki Sakakida, Kazunori Honda, Toshiki Masuishi, Yukiya Narita, Hiroya Taniguchi, Masashi Ando, Toshihiro Kishikawa, Hoshino Terada, Shintaro Beppu, Daisuke Nishikawa, Hidenori Suzuki, Nobuhiro Hanai, Kei Muro","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02698-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nivolumab is the standard treatment for platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). Several studies have reported the efficacy of paclitaxel plus cetuximab (PC) combination therapy in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with platinum-refractory R/M-HNSCC treated with nivolumab or PC at our institution between January 2015 and March 2022. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HNSCC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, with platinum-refractory R/M disease, defined as recurrence or disease progression within 6 months after platinum-based definitive chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the 56 patients (21 PC/35 nivolumab) were ECOG PS 1-2 (76/54%), metastatic sites ≥ 2 (33/46%), local recurrence (62/23%), and median tumor size (43.2/26.2 mm). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) tended to favor PC over nivolumab (4.3/2.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.7, p = 0.41), and median overall survival tended to be inferior for PC (8.0/23.2 months, HR: 1.58, p = 0.20). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for several relevant factors. The objective response rate was numerically higher with PC (31/19%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with PC (29/6%), and the most prevalent were leukopenia (19%) for PC and liver dysfunction (6%) for nivolumab. Subsequent treatment with PC and nivolumab was administered to 75% and 72% of patients, respectively; the mPFS of these patients was significantly lower with PC (1.6/9.2 months, HR: 9.9, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PC and nivolumab are viable treatment options for platinum-refractory R/M-HNSCC, though their efficacy and safety profiles should be carefully considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paclitaxel plus cetuximab versus nivolumab for patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Kodama, Shigenori Kadowaki, Yasunobu Ishizuka, Munehiro Wakabayashi, Tomoki Sakakida, Kazunori Honda, Toshiki Masuishi, Yukiya Narita, Hiroya Taniguchi, Masashi Ando, Toshihiro Kishikawa, Hoshino Terada, Shintaro Beppu, Daisuke Nishikawa, Hidenori Suzuki, Nobuhiro Hanai, Kei Muro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02698-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nivolumab is the standard treatment for platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). Several studies have reported the efficacy of paclitaxel plus cetuximab (PC) combination therapy in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with platinum-refractory R/M-HNSCC treated with nivolumab or PC at our institution between January 2015 and March 2022. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HNSCC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, with platinum-refractory R/M disease, defined as recurrence or disease progression within 6 months after platinum-based definitive chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the 56 patients (21 PC/35 nivolumab) were ECOG PS 1-2 (76/54%), metastatic sites ≥ 2 (33/46%), local recurrence (62/23%), and median tumor size (43.2/26.2 mm). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) tended to favor PC over nivolumab (4.3/2.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.7, p = 0.41), and median overall survival tended to be inferior for PC (8.0/23.2 months, HR: 1.58, p = 0.20). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for several relevant factors. The objective response rate was numerically higher with PC (31/19%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with PC (29/6%), and the most prevalent were leukopenia (19%) for PC and liver dysfunction (6%) for nivolumab. Subsequent treatment with PC and nivolumab was administered to 75% and 72% of patients, respectively; the mPFS of these patients was significantly lower with PC (1.6/9.2 months, HR: 9.9, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PC and nivolumab are viable treatment options for platinum-refractory R/M-HNSCC, though their efficacy and safety profiles should be carefully considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02698-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02698-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Nivolumab是铂难治性复发/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M-HNSCC)的标准治疗药物。一些研究报道了紫杉醇加西妥昔单抗(PC)联合治疗在该患者群体中的疗效。方法:我们对2015年1月至2022年3月在我院接受纳武单抗或PC治疗的铂难治性R/M-HNSCC患者进行了回顾性分析。资格标准包括组织学证实的HNSCC, ECOG性能状态(PS) 0-2,伴有铂难治性R/M疾病,定义为铂基明确放化疗后6个月内复发或疾病进展。结果:56例患者(21例PC/35例nivolumab)的基线特征为ECOG PS 1-2(76/54%),转移部位≥2(33/46%),局部复发(62/23%),中位肿瘤大小(43.2/26.2 mm)。中位无进展生存期(mPFS)倾向于PC优于尼沃单抗(4.3/2.7个月,风险比[HR]: 0.7, p = 0.41),中位总生存期倾向于PC(8.0/23.2个月,HR: 1.58, p = 0.20)。在调整了几个相关因素后,得到了类似的结果。PC的客观有效率更高(31/19%)。3/4级不良事件在PC组更为常见(29/6%),最常见的是白细胞减少(19%)和尼武单抗的肝功能障碍(6%)。随后分别给予75%和72%的患者PC和纳武单抗治疗;PC组患者的mPFS显著低于PC组(1.6/9.2个月,HR: 9.9, p)。结论:PC和纳沃单抗都是铂难治R/M-HNSCC的可行治疗方案,但应仔细考虑其疗效和安全性。
Paclitaxel plus cetuximab versus nivolumab for patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.
Background: Nivolumab is the standard treatment for platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). Several studies have reported the efficacy of paclitaxel plus cetuximab (PC) combination therapy in this patient population.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with platinum-refractory R/M-HNSCC treated with nivolumab or PC at our institution between January 2015 and March 2022. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HNSCC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, with platinum-refractory R/M disease, defined as recurrence or disease progression within 6 months after platinum-based definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Results: The baseline characteristics of the 56 patients (21 PC/35 nivolumab) were ECOG PS 1-2 (76/54%), metastatic sites ≥ 2 (33/46%), local recurrence (62/23%), and median tumor size (43.2/26.2 mm). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) tended to favor PC over nivolumab (4.3/2.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.7, p = 0.41), and median overall survival tended to be inferior for PC (8.0/23.2 months, HR: 1.58, p = 0.20). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for several relevant factors. The objective response rate was numerically higher with PC (31/19%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with PC (29/6%), and the most prevalent were leukopenia (19%) for PC and liver dysfunction (6%) for nivolumab. Subsequent treatment with PC and nivolumab was administered to 75% and 72% of patients, respectively; the mPFS of these patients was significantly lower with PC (1.6/9.2 months, HR: 9.9, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Both PC and nivolumab are viable treatment options for platinum-refractory R/M-HNSCC, though their efficacy and safety profiles should be carefully considered.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.