两种MALDI-TOF质谱系统及提取方法对临床标本中丝状真菌鉴定的评价。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01548-24
Eric M Ransom, Meghan A Wallace, Nathan P Wiederhold, Connie Cañete-Gibas, Carey-Ann D Burnham
{"title":"两种MALDI-TOF质谱系统及提取方法对临床标本中丝状真菌鉴定的评价。","authors":"Eric M Ransom, Meghan A Wallace, Nathan P Wiederhold, Connie Cañete-Gibas, Carey-Ann D Burnham","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01548-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid and accurate identification of cultured molds is important to determine clinical significance and therapeutic decision-making. Conventional mold identification uses phenotypic macroscopic and microscopic characterization; however, this can take days or weeks for colony maturity and definitive microscopic structure formation, be limited to genus-level identification, and be misidentified due to morphologic mimics or similarities between closely related species. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) revolutionized bacterial and yeast identification but remains uncommon for molds in part because of limited reference libraries. Here, a retrospective 5-year review at a large teaching hospital found that 88.6% of identified molds were in the Bruker Filamentous Fungi Library 3.0 and 91.5% in the VITEK Knowledge Base Library 3.2.0. A prospective evaluation was also performed on early growth from 205 consecutive, working clinical isolates. Each mold was processed using the VITEK chemical extraction method and modified NIH chemical plus bead-beating extraction method; both extractions were tested on both systems. When compared to conventional identification, more molds were identified using VITEK extractions over NIH extractions using the VITEK (65 and 59%) and Bruker (56 and 54%) systems, respectively, using the ≥1.5 log Bruker threshold. VITEK MS identified more molds, regardless of the extraction method. Isolates without consensus agreement (<i>n</i> = 116) underwent sequence-based identification, which demonstrated that conventional identification had the highest genus-level (84%) but lowest species-level (3%) identification rates compared to VITEK (59 and 52%, respectively) and Bruker (52 and 36%) using VITEK extractions. Taken together, our findings suggest both MALDI-TOF systems can supplement conventional mold identification to optimize identification rates with species-level distinction.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mold identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) remains uncommon in clinical laboratories. Contributing concerns include limited genus/species spectra in the MALDI-TOF MS libraries, varying success rates in the literature regarding extraction methods and instrumentation, and the lack of practical performance evaluations using early mold colony growth, which would be used in a clinical mycology laboratory. This study used multiple approaches to improve our understanding of the clinical utility and performance of MALDI-TOF MS mold identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0154824"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of two MALDI-TOF MS systems and extraction methods for identification of filamentous fungi recovered from clinical specimens.\",\"authors\":\"Eric M Ransom, Meghan A Wallace, Nathan P Wiederhold, Connie Cañete-Gibas, Carey-Ann D Burnham\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.01548-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rapid and accurate identification of cultured molds is important to determine clinical significance and therapeutic decision-making. Conventional mold identification uses phenotypic macroscopic and microscopic characterization; however, this can take days or weeks for colony maturity and definitive microscopic structure formation, be limited to genus-level identification, and be misidentified due to morphologic mimics or similarities between closely related species. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) revolutionized bacterial and yeast identification but remains uncommon for molds in part because of limited reference libraries. Here, a retrospective 5-year review at a large teaching hospital found that 88.6% of identified molds were in the Bruker Filamentous Fungi Library 3.0 and 91.5% in the VITEK Knowledge Base Library 3.2.0. A prospective evaluation was also performed on early growth from 205 consecutive, working clinical isolates. Each mold was processed using the VITEK chemical extraction method and modified NIH chemical plus bead-beating extraction method; both extractions were tested on both systems. When compared to conventional identification, more molds were identified using VITEK extractions over NIH extractions using the VITEK (65 and 59%) and Bruker (56 and 54%) systems, respectively, using the ≥1.5 log Bruker threshold. VITEK MS identified more molds, regardless of the extraction method. Isolates without consensus agreement (<i>n</i> = 116) underwent sequence-based identification, which demonstrated that conventional identification had the highest genus-level (84%) but lowest species-level (3%) identification rates compared to VITEK (59 and 52%, respectively) and Bruker (52 and 36%) using VITEK extractions. Taken together, our findings suggest both MALDI-TOF systems can supplement conventional mold identification to optimize identification rates with species-level distinction.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mold identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) remains uncommon in clinical laboratories. Contributing concerns include limited genus/species spectra in the MALDI-TOF MS libraries, varying success rates in the literature regarding extraction methods and instrumentation, and the lack of practical performance evaluations using early mold colony growth, which would be used in a clinical mycology laboratory. This study used multiple approaches to improve our understanding of the clinical utility and performance of MALDI-TOF MS mold identification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0154824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837564/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01548-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01548-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速准确地鉴定培养霉菌对确定临床意义和治疗决策具有重要意义。传统的霉菌鉴定采用表型宏观和微观表征;然而,这可能需要数天或数周的时间来使菌落成熟和确定的微观结构形成,仅限于属水平的鉴定,并且由于形态模仿或密切相关物种之间的相似性而被错误鉴定。基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)彻底改变了细菌和酵母的鉴定,但由于参考文库有限,在霉菌鉴定中仍然不常见。本文对某大型教学医院5年的回顾性研究发现,88.6%的已鉴定霉菌存在于Bruker丝状真菌库3.0中,91.5%存在于VITEK知识库库3.2.0中。对205个连续临床分离株的早期生长进行了前瞻性评估。每个模具采用VITEK化学萃取法和改良的NIH化学加打珠萃取法进行加工;两种萃取物都在两种系统上进行了测试。与传统鉴定相比,使用VITEK提取液比使用VITEK(65%和59%)和Bruker(56%和54%)系统的NIH提取液鉴定出更多的霉菌,使用≥1.5 log Bruker阈值。无论提取方法如何,VITEK MS鉴定出更多的霉菌。未达成一致协议的分离株(n = 116)进行了基于序列的鉴定,结果表明,与使用VITEK提取液(分别为59%和52%)和Bruker提取液(分别为52%和36%)相比,常规鉴定具有最高的属水平(84%)和最低的种水平(3%)鉴定率。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,MALDI-TOF系统可以补充传统的霉菌鉴定,以优化物种水平区分的鉴定率。重要性:使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)进行霉菌鉴定在临床实验室中仍然不常见。主要问题包括MALDI-TOF MS文库中有限的属/种光谱,关于提取方法和仪器的文献成功率不同,以及缺乏临床真菌学实验室中使用的早期霉菌菌落生长的实际性能评估。本研究使用了多种方法来提高我们对MALDI-TOF质谱霉菌鉴定的临床应用和性能的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of two MALDI-TOF MS systems and extraction methods for identification of filamentous fungi recovered from clinical specimens.

Rapid and accurate identification of cultured molds is important to determine clinical significance and therapeutic decision-making. Conventional mold identification uses phenotypic macroscopic and microscopic characterization; however, this can take days or weeks for colony maturity and definitive microscopic structure formation, be limited to genus-level identification, and be misidentified due to morphologic mimics or similarities between closely related species. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) revolutionized bacterial and yeast identification but remains uncommon for molds in part because of limited reference libraries. Here, a retrospective 5-year review at a large teaching hospital found that 88.6% of identified molds were in the Bruker Filamentous Fungi Library 3.0 and 91.5% in the VITEK Knowledge Base Library 3.2.0. A prospective evaluation was also performed on early growth from 205 consecutive, working clinical isolates. Each mold was processed using the VITEK chemical extraction method and modified NIH chemical plus bead-beating extraction method; both extractions were tested on both systems. When compared to conventional identification, more molds were identified using VITEK extractions over NIH extractions using the VITEK (65 and 59%) and Bruker (56 and 54%) systems, respectively, using the ≥1.5 log Bruker threshold. VITEK MS identified more molds, regardless of the extraction method. Isolates without consensus agreement (n = 116) underwent sequence-based identification, which demonstrated that conventional identification had the highest genus-level (84%) but lowest species-level (3%) identification rates compared to VITEK (59 and 52%, respectively) and Bruker (52 and 36%) using VITEK extractions. Taken together, our findings suggest both MALDI-TOF systems can supplement conventional mold identification to optimize identification rates with species-level distinction.

Importance: Mold identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) remains uncommon in clinical laboratories. Contributing concerns include limited genus/species spectra in the MALDI-TOF MS libraries, varying success rates in the literature regarding extraction methods and instrumentation, and the lack of practical performance evaluations using early mold colony growth, which would be used in a clinical mycology laboratory. This study used multiple approaches to improve our understanding of the clinical utility and performance of MALDI-TOF MS mold identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Nanopore sequencing for precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance: a retrospective multicenter study in China. External quality assessment of molecular detection and variant typing of SARS-CoV-2 in European expert laboratories in 2023. Lipid fingerprinting by MALDI Biotyper Sirius instrument fails to differentiate the three subspecies of the Mycobacterium abscessus complex. The impact of FDA-cleared molecular solutions for BK polyomavirus quantitation. A rapid and simple MALDI-TOF MS lipid profiling method for differentiating Mycobacterium ulcerans from Mycobacterium marinum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1