Kyla Radke, Brandon Rivers, Mya Simpkins, Jacob Hardy, Jeffrey K Schachterle
{"title":"软腐病症状农产品中果胶溶菌的鉴定与基因组学研究。","authors":"Kyla Radke, Brandon Rivers, Mya Simpkins, Jacob Hardy, Jeffrey K Schachterle","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13121096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial soft rot causes major crop losses annually and can be caused by several species from multiple genera. These bacteria have a broad host range and often infect produce through contact with soil. The main genera causing bacterial soft rot are <i>Pectobacterium</i> and <i>Dickeya</i>, both of which have widespread geographical distribution. Because of many recent renaming and reclassifications of bacteria causing soft rot, identification and characterization of the causative agents can be challenging. In this work, we surveyed commercially available produce exhibiting typical soft rot symptoms, isolating pectinolytic bacteria and characterizing them genetically and phenotypically. We found that in our sampling, many samples were from the genus <i>Pectobacterium</i>; however, other genera were also capable of eliciting symptoms in potatoes, including an isolate from the genus <i>Chryseobacterium</i>. Genomic analyses revealed that many of the <i>Pectobacterium</i> isolates collected share prophages not found in other soft rot species, suggesting a potential role for these prophages in the evolution or fitness of these isolates. Our <i>Chryseobacterium</i> isolate was most similar to <i>C. scophthalmum</i>, a fish pathogen, suggesting that this isolate may be a crossover pathogen.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization and Genomics of Pectinolytic Bacteria Isolated from Soft Rot Symptomatic Produce.\",\"authors\":\"Kyla Radke, Brandon Rivers, Mya Simpkins, Jacob Hardy, Jeffrey K Schachterle\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens13121096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bacterial soft rot causes major crop losses annually and can be caused by several species from multiple genera. These bacteria have a broad host range and often infect produce through contact with soil. The main genera causing bacterial soft rot are <i>Pectobacterium</i> and <i>Dickeya</i>, both of which have widespread geographical distribution. Because of many recent renaming and reclassifications of bacteria causing soft rot, identification and characterization of the causative agents can be challenging. In this work, we surveyed commercially available produce exhibiting typical soft rot symptoms, isolating pectinolytic bacteria and characterizing them genetically and phenotypically. We found that in our sampling, many samples were from the genus <i>Pectobacterium</i>; however, other genera were also capable of eliciting symptoms in potatoes, including an isolate from the genus <i>Chryseobacterium</i>. Genomic analyses revealed that many of the <i>Pectobacterium</i> isolates collected share prophages not found in other soft rot species, suggesting a potential role for these prophages in the evolution or fitness of these isolates. Our <i>Chryseobacterium</i> isolate was most similar to <i>C. scophthalmum</i>, a fish pathogen, suggesting that this isolate may be a crossover pathogen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characterization and Genomics of Pectinolytic Bacteria Isolated from Soft Rot Symptomatic Produce.
Bacterial soft rot causes major crop losses annually and can be caused by several species from multiple genera. These bacteria have a broad host range and often infect produce through contact with soil. The main genera causing bacterial soft rot are Pectobacterium and Dickeya, both of which have widespread geographical distribution. Because of many recent renaming and reclassifications of bacteria causing soft rot, identification and characterization of the causative agents can be challenging. In this work, we surveyed commercially available produce exhibiting typical soft rot symptoms, isolating pectinolytic bacteria and characterizing them genetically and phenotypically. We found that in our sampling, many samples were from the genus Pectobacterium; however, other genera were also capable of eliciting symptoms in potatoes, including an isolate from the genus Chryseobacterium. Genomic analyses revealed that many of the Pectobacterium isolates collected share prophages not found in other soft rot species, suggesting a potential role for these prophages in the evolution or fitness of these isolates. Our Chryseobacterium isolate was most similar to C. scophthalmum, a fish pathogen, suggesting that this isolate may be a crossover pathogen.
期刊介绍:
Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.