新辅助化疗免疫治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 9.1 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacological research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107598
Xiayi Zhu, Jie Qiu, Ya Zhang, Chunni Lin, Xiaohui Wang, Xiwei Shi, Siya Yang, Qiaoyan Wu, Li Cong
{"title":"新辅助化疗免疫治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiayi Zhu,&nbsp;Jie Qiu,&nbsp;Ya Zhang,&nbsp;Chunni Lin,&nbsp;Xiaohui Wang,&nbsp;Xiwei Shi,&nbsp;Siya Yang,&nbsp;Qiaoyan Wu,&nbsp;Li Cong","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy emerged as a promising treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, a comparison of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide evidence supporting clinical decision-making for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in LA-SCCHN treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy in LA-SCCHN published before August 10, 2024. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024573816).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 clinical trials with 2021 patients were included. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group had significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) (33 % vs. 18 %, <em>P</em> = 0.04) and partial response (PR) (65 % vs. 38 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). No significant differences were found in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95 % CI: 0.77–0.93) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.61–0.86). Regarding safety outcomes, in the single-arm trials, grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 % of the chemoimmunotherapy group and 13 % of the chemotherapy group, with grade 5 TRAEs at 0 % and 4 %, respectively, showing no significant difference (<em>P</em> = 0.80; <em>P</em> = 0.08). In both RCTs and non-RCT, chemoimmunotherapy had a higher Risk Ratio (RR) for grade 3–4 TRAEs (RR: 1.42, 95 % CI: 0.87–2.31).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown promising efficacy and safety for LA-SCCHN, but further randomized trials are needed to confirm long-term survival benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19918,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological research","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107598"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xiayi Zhu,&nbsp;Jie Qiu,&nbsp;Ya Zhang,&nbsp;Chunni Lin,&nbsp;Xiaohui Wang,&nbsp;Xiwei Shi,&nbsp;Siya Yang,&nbsp;Qiaoyan Wu,&nbsp;Li Cong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy emerged as a promising treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, a comparison of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide evidence supporting clinical decision-making for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in LA-SCCHN treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy in LA-SCCHN published before August 10, 2024. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024573816).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 clinical trials with 2021 patients were included. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group had significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) (33 % vs. 18 %, <em>P</em> = 0.04) and partial response (PR) (65 % vs. 38 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). No significant differences were found in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95 % CI: 0.77–0.93) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.61–0.86). Regarding safety outcomes, in the single-arm trials, grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 % of the chemoimmunotherapy group and 13 % of the chemotherapy group, with grade 5 TRAEs at 0 % and 4 %, respectively, showing no significant difference (<em>P</em> = 0.80; <em>P</em> = 0.08). In both RCTs and non-RCT, chemoimmunotherapy had a higher Risk Ratio (RR) for grade 3–4 TRAEs (RR: 1.42, 95 % CI: 0.87–2.31).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown promising efficacy and safety for LA-SCCHN, but further randomized trials are needed to confirm long-term survival benefits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological research\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661825000234\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661825000234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新辅助化学免疫治疗是治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-SCCHN)的一种很有希望的治疗方法。然而,缺乏与新辅助化疗的临床结果的比较。目的:为LA-SCCHN新辅助化疗的临床决策提供依据。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索2024年8月10日前发表的关于LA-SCCHN新辅助化疗、免疫治疗和化疗的疗效和安全性的文献。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024573816)。结果:共纳入28项临床试验,2021例患者。新辅助化疗组病理完全缓解(pCR) (33% vs. 18%, P = 0.04)和部分缓解(PR) (65% vs. 38%, P < 0.01)明显高于化疗组。总生存期(OS)(风险比:0.85,95% CI: 0.77-0.93)和无进展生存期(PFS)(风险比:0.72,95% CI: 0.61-0.86)无显著差异。关于安全性结局,在单臂试验中,化疗免疫治疗组和化疗组发生3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的比例分别为14%和13%,其中5级TRAEs分别为0%和4%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.80;P = 0.08)。在随机对照试验和非随机对照试验中,化疗免疫治疗对3 - 4级TRAEs的风险比(RR)更高(RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.87-2.31)。结论:新辅助化疗免疫治疗对LA-SCCHN具有良好的疗效和安全性,但需要进一步的随机试验来证实长期生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy emerged as a promising treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, a comparison of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was lacking.

Objective

To provide evidence supporting clinical decision-making for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in LA-SCCHN treatment.

Methods

Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy in LA-SCCHN published before August 10, 2024. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024573816).

Results

A total of 28 clinical trials with 2021 patients were included. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group had significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) (33 % vs. 18 %, P = 0.04) and partial response (PR) (65 % vs. 38 %, P < 0.01). No significant differences were found in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95 % CI: 0.77–0.93) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.61–0.86). Regarding safety outcomes, in the single-arm trials, grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 % of the chemoimmunotherapy group and 13 % of the chemotherapy group, with grade 5 TRAEs at 0 % and 4 %, respectively, showing no significant difference (P = 0.80; P = 0.08). In both RCTs and non-RCT, chemoimmunotherapy had a higher Risk Ratio (RR) for grade 3–4 TRAEs (RR: 1.42, 95 % CI: 0.87–2.31).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown promising efficacy and safety for LA-SCCHN, but further randomized trials are needed to confirm long-term survival benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacological research
Pharmacological research 医学-药学
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
491
审稿时长
8 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Research publishes cutting-edge articles in biomedical sciences to cover a broad range of topics that move the pharmacological field forward. Pharmacological research publishes articles on molecular, biochemical, translational, and clinical research (including clinical trials); it is proud of its rapid publication of accepted papers that comprises a dedicated, fast acceptance and publication track for high profile articles.
期刊最新文献
An in vitro pharmacogenomic approach reveals subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT). Lactobacillus vaginalis alleviates DSS induced colitis by regulating the gut microbiota and increasing the production of 3-indoleacrylic acid. Gut microbiome-derived indole-3-carboxaldehyde regulates stress vulnerability in chronic restraint stress by activating aryl hydrocarbon receptors Quality and composition control of complex TCM preparations through a novel “Herbs-in vivo Compounds-Targets-Pathways” network methodology: The case of Lianhuaqingwen capsules Neuronal PCSK9 regulates cognitive performances via the modulation of ApoER2 synaptic localization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1