头颈部放疗中口腔黏膜炎风险的机器学习预测模型:初步研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09158-6
Elisa Kauark-Fontes, Anna Luiza Damaceno Araújo, Danilo Oliveira Andrade, Karina Morais Faria, Ana Carolina Prado-Ribeiro, Alexa Laheij, Ricardo Araújo Rios, Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho, Thais Bianca Brandão, Alan Roger Santos-Silva
{"title":"头颈部放疗中口腔黏膜炎风险的机器学习预测模型:初步研究。","authors":"Elisa Kauark-Fontes, Anna Luiza Damaceno Araújo, Danilo Oliveira Andrade, Karina Morais Faria, Ana Carolina Prado-Ribeiro, Alexa Laheij, Ricardo Araújo Rios, Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho, Thais Bianca Brandão, Alan Roger Santos-Silva","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09158-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral mucositis (OM) reflects a complex interplay of several risk factors. Machine learning (ML) is a promising frontier in science, capable of processing dense information. This study aims to assess the performance of ML in predicting OM risk in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were collected from 157 patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma submitted to radiotherapy. Grade 2 OM or higher was considered (NCI). Two dataset versions were used; in the first version, all data were considered, and in the second version, a feature selection was added. Age, smoking status, surgery, radiotherapy prescription dose, treatment modality, histopathological differentiation, tumor stage, presence of oral cancer lesion, and tumor location were selected as key features. The training process used a fivefold cross-validation strategy with 10 repetitions. A total of 4 algorithms and 3 scaling methods were trained (12 models), without using data augmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparative assessment was performed. Accuracy greater than 55% was considered. No relevant results were achieved with the first version, closest performance was Decision Trees with 52% of accuracy, 42% of sensitivity, and 60% of specificity. For the second version, relevant results were achieved, K-Nearest Neighbors outperformed with 64% accuracy, 58% sensitivity, and 68% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML demonstrated promising results in OM risk prediction. Model improvement was observed after feature selection. Best result was achieved with the KNN model. This is the first study to test ML for OM risk prediction using clinical data.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning prediction model for oral mucositis risk in head and neck radiotherapy: a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Kauark-Fontes, Anna Luiza Damaceno Araújo, Danilo Oliveira Andrade, Karina Morais Faria, Ana Carolina Prado-Ribeiro, Alexa Laheij, Ricardo Araújo Rios, Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho, Thais Bianca Brandão, Alan Roger Santos-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09158-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral mucositis (OM) reflects a complex interplay of several risk factors. Machine learning (ML) is a promising frontier in science, capable of processing dense information. This study aims to assess the performance of ML in predicting OM risk in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were collected from 157 patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma submitted to radiotherapy. Grade 2 OM or higher was considered (NCI). Two dataset versions were used; in the first version, all data were considered, and in the second version, a feature selection was added. Age, smoking status, surgery, radiotherapy prescription dose, treatment modality, histopathological differentiation, tumor stage, presence of oral cancer lesion, and tumor location were selected as key features. The training process used a fivefold cross-validation strategy with 10 repetitions. A total of 4 algorithms and 3 scaling methods were trained (12 models), without using data augmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparative assessment was performed. Accuracy greater than 55% was considered. No relevant results were achieved with the first version, closest performance was Decision Trees with 52% of accuracy, 42% of sensitivity, and 60% of specificity. For the second version, relevant results were achieved, K-Nearest Neighbors outperformed with 64% accuracy, 58% sensitivity, and 68% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML demonstrated promising results in OM risk prediction. Model improvement was observed after feature selection. Best result was achieved with the KNN model. This is the first study to test ML for OM risk prediction using clinical data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09158-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09158-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:口腔黏膜炎(OM)反映了多种危险因素的复杂相互作用。机器学习(ML)是一个有前途的前沿科学,能够处理密集的信息。本研究旨在评估ML在预测头颈部放疗患者OM风险中的作用。方法:收集157例接受放射治疗的口腔、口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的临床资料。2级或以上被认为是(NCI)。使用了两个数据集版本;在第一个版本中,考虑了所有数据,在第二个版本中,添加了一个特征选择。年龄、吸烟状况、手术情况、放疗处方剂量、治疗方式、组织病理分化、肿瘤分期、有无口腔癌病变、肿瘤部位为主要特征。训练过程采用五重交叉验证策略,重复10次。在不使用数据增强的情况下,共训练了4种算法和3种缩放方法(12个模型)。结果:进行了比较评价。考虑准确率大于55%。第一个版本没有获得相关结果,最接近的表现是决策树,准确率为52%,灵敏度为42%,特异性为60%。对于第二个版本,获得了相关结果,k近邻以64%的准确率,58%的灵敏度和68%的特异性优于其他版本。结论:ML在预测OM风险方面有较好的效果。特征选择后观察到模型的改进。用KNN模型得到了最好的结果。这是第一个使用临床数据测试ML对OM风险预测的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning prediction model for oral mucositis risk in head and neck radiotherapy: a preliminary study.

Purpose: Oral mucositis (OM) reflects a complex interplay of several risk factors. Machine learning (ML) is a promising frontier in science, capable of processing dense information. This study aims to assess the performance of ML in predicting OM risk in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.

Methods: Clinical data were collected from 157 patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma submitted to radiotherapy. Grade 2 OM or higher was considered (NCI). Two dataset versions were used; in the first version, all data were considered, and in the second version, a feature selection was added. Age, smoking status, surgery, radiotherapy prescription dose, treatment modality, histopathological differentiation, tumor stage, presence of oral cancer lesion, and tumor location were selected as key features. The training process used a fivefold cross-validation strategy with 10 repetitions. A total of 4 algorithms and 3 scaling methods were trained (12 models), without using data augmentation.

Results: A comparative assessment was performed. Accuracy greater than 55% was considered. No relevant results were achieved with the first version, closest performance was Decision Trees with 52% of accuracy, 42% of sensitivity, and 60% of specificity. For the second version, relevant results were achieved, K-Nearest Neighbors outperformed with 64% accuracy, 58% sensitivity, and 68% specificity.

Conclusion: ML demonstrated promising results in OM risk prediction. Model improvement was observed after feature selection. Best result was achieved with the KNN model. This is the first study to test ML for OM risk prediction using clinical data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review. The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of early breast cancer: A scoping review of risk factors and outcomes. Sleep quality in lung cancer and specifically non-small-cell lung cancer: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1