工作时间对后期血管内治疗后再灌注成功的影响。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1177/19714009251313512
Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Michael D Hill, Sean Murphy, Danilo Toni, Michel Patrik, Ilaria Casetta, Sarah Power, Valentina Saia, Giovanni Pracucci, Salvatore Mangiafico, Karl Boyle, Stefania Nannoni, Enrico Fainardi, John Thornton, Beom Joon Kim, Bijoy K Menon, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Fouzi Bala
{"title":"工作时间对后期血管内治疗后再灌注成功的影响。","authors":"Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Michael D Hill, Sean Murphy, Danilo Toni, Michel Patrik, Ilaria Casetta, Sarah Power, Valentina Saia, Giovanni Pracucci, Salvatore Mangiafico, Karl Boyle, Stefania Nannoni, Enrico Fainardi, John Thornton, Beom Joon Kim, Bijoy K Menon, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Fouzi Bala","doi":"10.1177/19714009251313512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Successful and complete reperfusion should be the aim of every endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) procedure. However, the effect of time delays on successful reperfusion in late window stroke patients presenting 6-to-24 h from onset has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We pooled individual patient-level data from seven trials and registries for anterior circulation stroke patients treated with EVT between 6 and 24 h from onset. We explored the impact of delays across multiple interval times, including onset to hospital arrival; hospital arrival to arterial puncture; imaging to arterial puncture; and onset to arterial puncture. Our primary outcome was successful reperfusion, defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b-3. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between each of the interval times and successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 608 patients. The median age was 70 years (IQR 58-79), and 307 (50.5%) were females. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 494 (81.2%) patients. Patients with successful reperfusion had lower NIHSS scores (median 15 [IQR11-19] vs 17 [11-21], <i>p</i> = .02) and significantly shorter hospital arrival to arterial puncture time (90 min [60-150] vs 110 min [84.5-150], <i>p</i> = .01) than unsuccessful reperfusion. The odds of successful reperfusion decreased by 15% for every one-hour delay in arrival-to-puncture time (adjusted odds ratio 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). Other workflow times did not impact the rate of successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faster hospital arrival to arterial puncture time is associated with higher odds of successful reperfusion in late window stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251313512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of workflow times on successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment in the late time window.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Michael D Hill, Sean Murphy, Danilo Toni, Michel Patrik, Ilaria Casetta, Sarah Power, Valentina Saia, Giovanni Pracucci, Salvatore Mangiafico, Karl Boyle, Stefania Nannoni, Enrico Fainardi, John Thornton, Beom Joon Kim, Bijoy K Menon, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Fouzi Bala\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009251313512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Successful and complete reperfusion should be the aim of every endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) procedure. However, the effect of time delays on successful reperfusion in late window stroke patients presenting 6-to-24 h from onset has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We pooled individual patient-level data from seven trials and registries for anterior circulation stroke patients treated with EVT between 6 and 24 h from onset. We explored the impact of delays across multiple interval times, including onset to hospital arrival; hospital arrival to arterial puncture; imaging to arterial puncture; and onset to arterial puncture. Our primary outcome was successful reperfusion, defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b-3. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between each of the interval times and successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 608 patients. The median age was 70 years (IQR 58-79), and 307 (50.5%) were females. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 494 (81.2%) patients. Patients with successful reperfusion had lower NIHSS scores (median 15 [IQR11-19] vs 17 [11-21], <i>p</i> = .02) and significantly shorter hospital arrival to arterial puncture time (90 min [60-150] vs 110 min [84.5-150], <i>p</i> = .01) than unsuccessful reperfusion. The odds of successful reperfusion decreased by 15% for every one-hour delay in arrival-to-puncture time (adjusted odds ratio 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). Other workflow times did not impact the rate of successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faster hospital arrival to arterial puncture time is associated with higher odds of successful reperfusion in late window stroke patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009251313512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251313512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251313512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:成功和完全的再灌注应该是每一个血管内取栓(EVT)手术的目标。然而,时间延迟对发病后6- 24小时的晚窗卒中患者再灌注成功的影响尚未研究。材料和方法:我们汇集了来自7项试验和登记的前循环卒中患者的个体患者水平数据,这些患者在发病后6至24小时内接受EVT治疗。我们探索了多个间隔时间的延迟影响,包括从发病到到达医院;医院到达动脉穿刺;影像学到动脉穿刺;从动脉穿刺开始。我们的主要终点是成功的再灌注,定义为改良的脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)评分为2b-3。采用Logistic回归分析评估每次间隔时间与再灌注成功之间的关系。结果:我们纳入了608例患者。中位年龄70岁(IQR 58 ~ 79),女性307例(50.5%)。494例(81.2%)患者再灌注成功。再灌注成功的患者NIHSS评分较低(中位数为15 [IQR11-19]对17 [11-21],p = 0.02),到达医院到动脉穿刺时间明显短于再灌注失败的患者(90分钟[60-150]对110分钟[84.5-150],p = 0.01)。到达至穿刺时间每延迟1小时,再灌注成功的几率降低15%(校正优势比0.85,95% CI: 0.75-0.95)。其他工作时间不影响再灌注成功率。结论:晚窗性脑卒中患者到达动脉穿刺时间越快,再灌注成功的几率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of workflow times on successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment in the late time window.

Background and purpose: Successful and complete reperfusion should be the aim of every endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) procedure. However, the effect of time delays on successful reperfusion in late window stroke patients presenting 6-to-24 h from onset has not been investigated.

Materials and methods: We pooled individual patient-level data from seven trials and registries for anterior circulation stroke patients treated with EVT between 6 and 24 h from onset. We explored the impact of delays across multiple interval times, including onset to hospital arrival; hospital arrival to arterial puncture; imaging to arterial puncture; and onset to arterial puncture. Our primary outcome was successful reperfusion, defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b-3. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between each of the interval times and successful reperfusion.

Results: We included 608 patients. The median age was 70 years (IQR 58-79), and 307 (50.5%) were females. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 494 (81.2%) patients. Patients with successful reperfusion had lower NIHSS scores (median 15 [IQR11-19] vs 17 [11-21], p = .02) and significantly shorter hospital arrival to arterial puncture time (90 min [60-150] vs 110 min [84.5-150], p = .01) than unsuccessful reperfusion. The odds of successful reperfusion decreased by 15% for every one-hour delay in arrival-to-puncture time (adjusted odds ratio 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). Other workflow times did not impact the rate of successful reperfusion.

Conclusion: Faster hospital arrival to arterial puncture time is associated with higher odds of successful reperfusion in late window stroke patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Photon-counting CT imaging of a patient with coiled and untreated intracranial saccular aneurysms. Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcome of acute ischemic stroke with absent opacification of the cervical internal carotid artery at CT-angiography after endovascular treatment. The teacher-mentee bond in medicine. Impact of workflow times on successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment in the late time window.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1