Daniel Chamié, Rahul Bahl, Julio Maia, Mauro Echavarria-Pinto, Suraya Gafore, Amr Saleh, Ecaterina Cristea, Henry Seligman, Rodrigo M Joaquim, Fausto Feres, Sayan Sen, Rasha Al-Lamee, Marinella Centemero, Christopher Baker, Tom Johnson, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Alexandra J Lansky, Ricardo Petraco
{"title":"注射造影剂会导致或加剧冠状动脉损伤吗?从血管和导管血流动力学的见解。","authors":"Daniel Chamié, Rahul Bahl, Julio Maia, Mauro Echavarria-Pinto, Suraya Gafore, Amr Saleh, Ecaterina Cristea, Henry Seligman, Rodrigo M Joaquim, Fausto Feres, Sayan Sen, Rasha Al-Lamee, Marinella Centemero, Christopher Baker, Tom Johnson, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Alexandra J Lansky, Ricardo Petraco","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mechanistic association between the hydraulic forces generated during contrast injection and the risk of coronary injury is poorly understood. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether contrast injections increase intracoronary pressures beyond resting levels and estimate the risk of hydraulic propagation of coronary dissections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that included patients with nonculprit, non-flow-limiting coronaries. A continuous 60-second pressure recording was taken at 5 predetermined locations during contrast injections: distal, mid, and proximal vessel, catheter tip, and inside the catheter. The primary end point was the change in intracoronary peak pressure between resting and injections in each location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 pressure recordings (58 vessels; 52 patients) were analyzed. Injections led to a small increase in peak pressure in the distal (mean difference, +4.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.5-7.4), mid (mean difference, +4.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.4-6.9), and proximal (mean difference, +5.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.5-7.7) vessel locations, and much higher increases at the catheter tip (mean difference, +11.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, 5.8-17.7) and inside the catheter (mean difference, +77.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 64.5-90.4). Compared to the distal vessel, pressure changes were only significant at the catheter tip (+10 mm Hg; <i>P</i> < .01) and inside the catheter (+79.1 mm Hg; <i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrast injections lead to negligible changes in intracoronary pressures beyond the catheter tip. Although it is sensible to minimize injections when coronary dissections are close to the catheter, it is unlikely that they would cause injuries beyond the catheter tip.</p>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 12","pages":"102396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Contrast Injections Cause or Propagate Coronary Injuries? Insights From Vessel and Guiding Catheter Hemodynamics.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Chamié, Rahul Bahl, Julio Maia, Mauro Echavarria-Pinto, Suraya Gafore, Amr Saleh, Ecaterina Cristea, Henry Seligman, Rodrigo M Joaquim, Fausto Feres, Sayan Sen, Rasha Al-Lamee, Marinella Centemero, Christopher Baker, Tom Johnson, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Alexandra J Lansky, Ricardo Petraco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mechanistic association between the hydraulic forces generated during contrast injection and the risk of coronary injury is poorly understood. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether contrast injections increase intracoronary pressures beyond resting levels and estimate the risk of hydraulic propagation of coronary dissections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that included patients with nonculprit, non-flow-limiting coronaries. A continuous 60-second pressure recording was taken at 5 predetermined locations during contrast injections: distal, mid, and proximal vessel, catheter tip, and inside the catheter. The primary end point was the change in intracoronary peak pressure between resting and injections in each location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 pressure recordings (58 vessels; 52 patients) were analyzed. Injections led to a small increase in peak pressure in the distal (mean difference, +4.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.5-7.4), mid (mean difference, +4.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.4-6.9), and proximal (mean difference, +5.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.5-7.7) vessel locations, and much higher increases at the catheter tip (mean difference, +11.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, 5.8-17.7) and inside the catheter (mean difference, +77.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 64.5-90.4). Compared to the distal vessel, pressure changes were only significant at the catheter tip (+10 mm Hg; <i>P</i> < .01) and inside the catheter (+79.1 mm Hg; <i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrast injections lead to negligible changes in intracoronary pressures beyond the catheter tip. Although it is sensible to minimize injections when coronary dissections are close to the catheter, it is unlikely that they would cause injuries beyond the catheter tip.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\"3 12\",\"pages\":\"102396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725123/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:造影剂注射过程中产生的液压力与冠状动脉损伤风险之间的机制关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们试图评估造影剂注射是否会使冠状动脉内压力超过静息水平,并评估冠状动脉剥离的水力传播风险。方法:这是一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心研究,纳入了非罪魁祸首、非血流限制性冠状动脉患者。在造影剂注射期间,在5个预定位置连续记录60秒的压力:远端、中端和近端血管、导管尖端和导管内部。主要终点是每个部位静息和注射之间冠状动脉内峰值压的变化。结果:共记录压力269次(血管58次;52例患者)进行分析。注射导致远端峰值压力小幅升高(平均差值+4.5 mm Hg;95% CI, 1.5-7.4),中位(平均差,+4.1 mm Hg;95% CI, 1.4-6.9)和近端(平均差,+5.1 mm Hg;95% CI, 2.5-7.7)血管位置,导管尖端的增加要高得多(平均差异,+11.7 mm Hg;95% CI, 5.8-17.7)和导管内(平均差,+77.5 mm Hg;95% ci, 64.5-90.4)。与远端血管相比,压力变化仅在导管尖端显著(+10 mm Hg;P < 0.01)和导管内(+79.1 mm Hg;P < 0.01)。结论:造影剂注射导致导管尖端以外冠状动脉内压力的变化可以忽略不计。虽然当冠状动脉夹层靠近导管时尽量减少注射是明智的,但它们不太可能造成导管尖端以外的损伤。
Can Contrast Injections Cause or Propagate Coronary Injuries? Insights From Vessel and Guiding Catheter Hemodynamics.
Background: The mechanistic association between the hydraulic forces generated during contrast injection and the risk of coronary injury is poorly understood. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether contrast injections increase intracoronary pressures beyond resting levels and estimate the risk of hydraulic propagation of coronary dissections.
Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that included patients with nonculprit, non-flow-limiting coronaries. A continuous 60-second pressure recording was taken at 5 predetermined locations during contrast injections: distal, mid, and proximal vessel, catheter tip, and inside the catheter. The primary end point was the change in intracoronary peak pressure between resting and injections in each location.
Results: A total of 269 pressure recordings (58 vessels; 52 patients) were analyzed. Injections led to a small increase in peak pressure in the distal (mean difference, +4.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.5-7.4), mid (mean difference, +4.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.4-6.9), and proximal (mean difference, +5.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.5-7.7) vessel locations, and much higher increases at the catheter tip (mean difference, +11.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, 5.8-17.7) and inside the catheter (mean difference, +77.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 64.5-90.4). Compared to the distal vessel, pressure changes were only significant at the catheter tip (+10 mm Hg; P < .01) and inside the catheter (+79.1 mm Hg; P < .01).
Conclusions: Contrast injections lead to negligible changes in intracoronary pressures beyond the catheter tip. Although it is sensible to minimize injections when coronary dissections are close to the catheter, it is unlikely that they would cause injuries beyond the catheter tip.