患者对骨质疏松管理的看法:一项由患者咨询小组进行的定性初步研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Archives of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0
R. M. Javier, F. Debiais, F. Alliot-Launois, D. Poivret, P. Bosgiraud, F. Barbe, M. Bouyssié, M. Devert, F. Roux, M. P. Sacchi, S. Sirot, P. Halbout, T. Chevalley, J. Y. Reginster, B. Cortet
{"title":"患者对骨质疏松管理的看法:一项由患者咨询小组进行的定性初步研究。","authors":"R. M. Javier,&nbsp;F. Debiais,&nbsp;F. Alliot-Launois,&nbsp;D. Poivret,&nbsp;P. Bosgiraud,&nbsp;F. Barbe,&nbsp;M. Bouyssié,&nbsp;M. Devert,&nbsp;F. Roux,&nbsp;M. P. Sacchi,&nbsp;S. Sirot,&nbsp;P. Halbout,&nbsp;T. Chevalley,&nbsp;J. Y. Reginster,&nbsp;B. Cortet","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>The management of osteoporosis even after a fracture is declining. Our pilot study in patients with osteoporosis confirms a large ignorance of the disease and major fears and uncertainties about the treatments. Complete and sustained medical information seems essential to counteract the contradictory information, which are exclusively negative.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The management of osteoporosis (OP) even after a fracture has declined over recent years despite the actions of the medical societies concerned with this disease. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate patients’ perceptions of OP, their treatment pathways, and how information is obtained.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Association Française de Lutte Anti-Rhumatismale (AFLAR) constituted an advisory group of 7 French patients (mean age 63.7 years [54–74 years]), with various stages of OP and duration of disease. A qualitative, anonymized study was conducted with an open-ended semi-structured questionnaire, with a contribution of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the “Groupe de Recherche et Informations sur les Ostéoporoses” (GRIO).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The onset of OP was often sudden, with the fracture occurring in a context of deep misunderstanding of OP by both the public and physicians. The patients have confidence in the physician, mostly a rheumatologist, who informs about OP and initiates the treatment. The main cause of non-adherence being major fears and uncertainties about efficacy and safety of treatments. Medical information is considered as insufficient, or poorly understood. Negative information has the highest impact, even if the sources seem unreliable, such as media. There is no trust in pharmaceutical companies and the ethics of physicians are in question.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This IOF/GRIO/AFLAR Patient Advisory Group pilot study illustrates the numerous barriers to effective OP management. Complete and sustained medical information, especially at the time of diagnosis and initiation of treatment, seems essential to counteract the contradictory information, which are exclusively negative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient perceptions of osteoporosis management: a qualitative pilot study by a patient advisory group\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Javier,&nbsp;F. Debiais,&nbsp;F. Alliot-Launois,&nbsp;D. Poivret,&nbsp;P. Bosgiraud,&nbsp;F. Barbe,&nbsp;M. Bouyssié,&nbsp;M. Devert,&nbsp;F. Roux,&nbsp;M. P. Sacchi,&nbsp;S. Sirot,&nbsp;P. Halbout,&nbsp;T. Chevalley,&nbsp;J. Y. Reginster,&nbsp;B. Cortet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>The management of osteoporosis even after a fracture is declining. Our pilot study in patients with osteoporosis confirms a large ignorance of the disease and major fears and uncertainties about the treatments. Complete and sustained medical information seems essential to counteract the contradictory information, which are exclusively negative.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The management of osteoporosis (OP) even after a fracture has declined over recent years despite the actions of the medical societies concerned with this disease. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate patients’ perceptions of OP, their treatment pathways, and how information is obtained.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Association Française de Lutte Anti-Rhumatismale (AFLAR) constituted an advisory group of 7 French patients (mean age 63.7 years [54–74 years]), with various stages of OP and duration of disease. A qualitative, anonymized study was conducted with an open-ended semi-structured questionnaire, with a contribution of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the “Groupe de Recherche et Informations sur les Ostéoporoses” (GRIO).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The onset of OP was often sudden, with the fracture occurring in a context of deep misunderstanding of OP by both the public and physicians. The patients have confidence in the physician, mostly a rheumatologist, who informs about OP and initiates the treatment. The main cause of non-adherence being major fears and uncertainties about efficacy and safety of treatments. Medical information is considered as insufficient, or poorly understood. Negative information has the highest impact, even if the sources seem unreliable, such as media. There is no trust in pharmaceutical companies and the ethics of physicians are in question.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This IOF/GRIO/AFLAR Patient Advisory Group pilot study illustrates the numerous barriers to effective OP management. Complete and sustained medical information, especially at the time of diagnosis and initiation of treatment, seems essential to counteract the contradictory information, which are exclusively negative.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01486-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在骨折后,骨质疏松症的治疗也在下降。我们对骨质疏松症患者的初步研究证实了对这种疾病的大量无知,以及对治疗的主要恐惧和不确定性。完整和持续的医疗信息似乎对抵消完全消极的相互矛盾的信息至关重要。目的:骨折后骨质疏松症(OP)的治疗近年来有所下降,尽管医学协会对这种疾病采取了行动。这项初步研究的目的是调查患者对OP的看法,他们的治疗途径,以及如何获得信息。方法:法国抗风湿病协会(AFLAR)组成了一个咨询小组,7名法国患者(平均年龄63.7岁[54-74岁]),不同阶段的OP和病程。在国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)和“研究和信息组织”(GRIO)的协助下,采用开放式半结构化问卷进行了一项定性的匿名研究。结果:OP的发病往往是突然的,骨折发生在公众和医生对OP的深刻误解的背景下。患者对医生(主要是风湿病学家)有信心,他们会告知OP并开始治疗。不坚持治疗的主要原因是对治疗的有效性和安全性的严重恐惧和不确定。医学信息被认为是不充分的,或者理解得很差。负面信息的影响最大,即使其来源看起来不可靠,比如媒体。人们对制药公司没有信任,医生的职业道德也受到质疑。结论:IOF/GRIO/AFLAR患者咨询小组的初步研究表明,有效的OP管理存在许多障碍。完整和持续的医疗信息,特别是在诊断和开始治疗时,似乎对抵消完全消极的相互矛盾的信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient perceptions of osteoporosis management: a qualitative pilot study by a patient advisory group

Summary

The management of osteoporosis even after a fracture is declining. Our pilot study in patients with osteoporosis confirms a large ignorance of the disease and major fears and uncertainties about the treatments. Complete and sustained medical information seems essential to counteract the contradictory information, which are exclusively negative.

Purpose

The management of osteoporosis (OP) even after a fracture has declined over recent years despite the actions of the medical societies concerned with this disease. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate patients’ perceptions of OP, their treatment pathways, and how information is obtained.

Methods

The Association Française de Lutte Anti-Rhumatismale (AFLAR) constituted an advisory group of 7 French patients (mean age 63.7 years [54–74 years]), with various stages of OP and duration of disease. A qualitative, anonymized study was conducted with an open-ended semi-structured questionnaire, with a contribution of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the “Groupe de Recherche et Informations sur les Ostéoporoses” (GRIO).

Results

The onset of OP was often sudden, with the fracture occurring in a context of deep misunderstanding of OP by both the public and physicians. The patients have confidence in the physician, mostly a rheumatologist, who informs about OP and initiates the treatment. The main cause of non-adherence being major fears and uncertainties about efficacy and safety of treatments. Medical information is considered as insufficient, or poorly understood. Negative information has the highest impact, even if the sources seem unreliable, such as media. There is no trust in pharmaceutical companies and the ethics of physicians are in question.

Conclusion

This IOF/GRIO/AFLAR Patient Advisory Group pilot study illustrates the numerous barriers to effective OP management. Complete and sustained medical information, especially at the time of diagnosis and initiation of treatment, seems essential to counteract the contradictory information, which are exclusively negative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
期刊最新文献
Hip fractures in older patients: analysing the activity of an orthopaedic department to design an optimized pathway of fracture care Ukrainian guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis Assessment of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures with T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans The management of osteoporosis in hospitalized patients with fragility hip fractures in western Saudi Arabia: a real-world tertiary center experience The association between the number of chronic conditions and treatment of patients who are at high risk for future fracture in the Ontario Fracture Screening and Prevention Program (FSPP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1