Elizabeth M Puyo, Jonathan M Carnino, Frances Rodriguez Lara, Jessica R Levi
{"title":"儿童睡眠呼吸暂停临床试验的资金、发表率和特征:一项横断面分析。","authors":"Elizabeth M Puyo, Jonathan M Carnino, Frances Rodriguez Lara, Jessica R Levi","doi":"10.1111/coa.14280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to characterise available clinical trial information for paediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and identify opportunities for future research to better treat children with this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of paediatric OSA clinical trials was conducted using the International Clinical Trials Registry. Criteria for inclusion included sleep apnea trials with participants < 18 years old and an interventional design. We assessed the information available on the database to identify recent trends in research. We used PubMed to examine publication rate. NIH RePORTER was used to characterise funding patterns for trials conducted in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 trials analysed, 54% of trials were conducted in the United States. The number of paediatric OSA clinical trials has been increasing since 2005. Patients aged 6, 7 and/or 8 were enrolled in 70% of trials, whereas infants under 12 months of age were only represented in approximately 9%. Overall, 31.9% had results reported directly on the registry, while 57% had results published. Median time to trial completion by sponsor for US trials was 3.04 years for NIH-sponsored trials, 1.29 years for industry-sponsored trials, and 1.96 years for non-funded sources. The NIH funded 56% of US trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a growing interest in paediatric OSA, continued focus on reporting and publishing results in a timely manner is essential to further advance the care of children with OSA. Future research should aim to address the gaps in age representation and focus on early intervention to treat age groups with higher prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funding, Publication Rate and Characteristics of Paediatric Sleep Apnea Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M Puyo, Jonathan M Carnino, Frances Rodriguez Lara, Jessica R Levi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to characterise available clinical trial information for paediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and identify opportunities for future research to better treat children with this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of paediatric OSA clinical trials was conducted using the International Clinical Trials Registry. Criteria for inclusion included sleep apnea trials with participants < 18 years old and an interventional design. We assessed the information available on the database to identify recent trends in research. We used PubMed to examine publication rate. NIH RePORTER was used to characterise funding patterns for trials conducted in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 trials analysed, 54% of trials were conducted in the United States. The number of paediatric OSA clinical trials has been increasing since 2005. Patients aged 6, 7 and/or 8 were enrolled in 70% of trials, whereas infants under 12 months of age were only represented in approximately 9%. Overall, 31.9% had results reported directly on the registry, while 57% had results published. Median time to trial completion by sponsor for US trials was 3.04 years for NIH-sponsored trials, 1.29 years for industry-sponsored trials, and 1.96 years for non-funded sources. The NIH funded 56% of US trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a growing interest in paediatric OSA, continued focus on reporting and publishing results in a timely manner is essential to further advance the care of children with OSA. Future research should aim to address the gaps in age representation and focus on early intervention to treat age groups with higher prevalence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14280\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Funding, Publication Rate and Characteristics of Paediatric Sleep Apnea Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Objective: The objective of this study is to characterise available clinical trial information for paediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and identify opportunities for future research to better treat children with this condition.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of paediatric OSA clinical trials was conducted using the International Clinical Trials Registry. Criteria for inclusion included sleep apnea trials with participants < 18 years old and an interventional design. We assessed the information available on the database to identify recent trends in research. We used PubMed to examine publication rate. NIH RePORTER was used to characterise funding patterns for trials conducted in the United States.
Results: Of 91 trials analysed, 54% of trials were conducted in the United States. The number of paediatric OSA clinical trials has been increasing since 2005. Patients aged 6, 7 and/or 8 were enrolled in 70% of trials, whereas infants under 12 months of age were only represented in approximately 9%. Overall, 31.9% had results reported directly on the registry, while 57% had results published. Median time to trial completion by sponsor for US trials was 3.04 years for NIH-sponsored trials, 1.29 years for industry-sponsored trials, and 1.96 years for non-funded sources. The NIH funded 56% of US trials.
Conclusion: Despite a growing interest in paediatric OSA, continued focus on reporting and publishing results in a timely manner is essential to further advance the care of children with OSA. Future research should aim to address the gaps in age representation and focus on early intervention to treat age groups with higher prevalence.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.