经颅磁刺激脉冲间隔不影响等距屈肘时肱二头肌皮质脊髓兴奋性。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES European Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1111/ejn.16671
David H. Imeson, Lea Gerditschke, Liana E. Brown, Davis A. Forman
{"title":"经颅磁刺激脉冲间隔不影响等距屈肘时肱二头肌皮质脊髓兴奋性。","authors":"David H. Imeson,&nbsp;Lea Gerditschke,&nbsp;Liana E. Brown,&nbsp;Davis A. Forman","doi":"10.1111/ejn.16671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research on resting muscles has shown that inter-pulse interval (IPI) duration influences transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) responses, which can introduce serious confounding variables into investigations if not accounted for. However, it is far less clear how IPI influences TMS responses in active muscles. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IPI and corticospinal excitability during submaximal isometric elbow flexion. Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii was measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via TMS. Stimulation intensity was set to 120% of the biceps brachii's active motor threshold while participants produced 10% of their biceps' maximal muscle activity. TMS was delivered as separate trains of five stimulations, with experimental conditions differing between IPIs of 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 or 14 s. Results demonstrated that IPI had no influence on MEP amplitudes for either the biceps or triceps. However, when MEP amplitudes were expressed as a unitless ratio to pre-stimulus muscle activity, a main effect of time was found for the biceps; MEP amplitudes progressively decreased with successive stimulations (MEP 1:32.8 ± 5.9; MEP 5:27.7 ± 4.3, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). These results suggest that IPI is unlikely to represent a confounding variable in TMS studies utilizing active contractions. However, studies looking to compare the amplitudes of single MEPs over time should be aware of the possibility that amplitudes may decrease with continuous stimulation. Future research should seek to examine even longer IPIs and explore the influence of higher stimulation intensities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Inter-Pulse Interval Does Not Influence Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii During Submaximal Isometric Elbow Flexion\",\"authors\":\"David H. Imeson,&nbsp;Lea Gerditschke,&nbsp;Liana E. Brown,&nbsp;Davis A. Forman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.16671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previous research on resting muscles has shown that inter-pulse interval (IPI) duration influences transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) responses, which can introduce serious confounding variables into investigations if not accounted for. However, it is far less clear how IPI influences TMS responses in active muscles. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IPI and corticospinal excitability during submaximal isometric elbow flexion. Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii was measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via TMS. Stimulation intensity was set to 120% of the biceps brachii's active motor threshold while participants produced 10% of their biceps' maximal muscle activity. TMS was delivered as separate trains of five stimulations, with experimental conditions differing between IPIs of 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 or 14 s. Results demonstrated that IPI had no influence on MEP amplitudes for either the biceps or triceps. However, when MEP amplitudes were expressed as a unitless ratio to pre-stimulus muscle activity, a main effect of time was found for the biceps; MEP amplitudes progressively decreased with successive stimulations (MEP 1:32.8 ± 5.9; MEP 5:27.7 ± 4.3, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). These results suggest that IPI is unlikely to represent a confounding variable in TMS studies utilizing active contractions. However, studies looking to compare the amplitudes of single MEPs over time should be aware of the possibility that amplitudes may decrease with continuous stimulation. Future research should seek to examine even longer IPIs and explore the influence of higher stimulation intensities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.16671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.16671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前对静息肌肉的研究表明,脉冲间隔(IPI)持续时间会影响经颅磁刺激(TMS)反应,如果不加以考虑,这可能会给研究带来严重的混淆变量。然而,IPI如何影响活动肌肉的经颅磁刺激反应尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是研究在次最大等距肘关节屈曲时IPI和皮质脊髓兴奋性之间的关系。采用经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位(MEPs)测量肱二头肌和肱三头肌皮质脊髓兴奋性。刺激强度设定为肱二头肌活跃运动阈值的120%,而参与者产生的肱二头肌最大肌肉活动的10%。经颅磁刺激分为5组刺激,ipi分别为4、6、8、10、12和14 s,实验条件不同。结果表明IPI对肱二头肌和肱三头肌的MEP振幅没有影响。然而,当MEP振幅表示为与刺激前肌肉活动的无单位比时,发现二头肌受时间的主要影响;MEP振幅随连续刺激逐渐降低(MEP 1:32.8±5.9;MEP:27.7±4.3,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Inter-Pulse Interval Does Not Influence Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii During Submaximal Isometric Elbow Flexion

Previous research on resting muscles has shown that inter-pulse interval (IPI) duration influences transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) responses, which can introduce serious confounding variables into investigations if not accounted for. However, it is far less clear how IPI influences TMS responses in active muscles. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IPI and corticospinal excitability during submaximal isometric elbow flexion. Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii was measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via TMS. Stimulation intensity was set to 120% of the biceps brachii's active motor threshold while participants produced 10% of their biceps' maximal muscle activity. TMS was delivered as separate trains of five stimulations, with experimental conditions differing between IPIs of 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 or 14 s. Results demonstrated that IPI had no influence on MEP amplitudes for either the biceps or triceps. However, when MEP amplitudes were expressed as a unitless ratio to pre-stimulus muscle activity, a main effect of time was found for the biceps; MEP amplitudes progressively decreased with successive stimulations (MEP 1:32.8 ± 5.9; MEP 5:27.7 ± 4.3, p < 0.05). These results suggest that IPI is unlikely to represent a confounding variable in TMS studies utilizing active contractions. However, studies looking to compare the amplitudes of single MEPs over time should be aware of the possibility that amplitudes may decrease with continuous stimulation. Future research should seek to examine even longer IPIs and explore the influence of higher stimulation intensities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
期刊最新文献
Geometry as a Guide: Enclosure Effects on Spatial Mapping (Commentary on Xu et al. 2024) NREM Sleep EEG Characteristics Following Written Trauma Memory Exposure: An Exploratory Study of Power and Spindle-Phase Dynamics Tacit Creationism Encourages Oversimplified Views of Functions and Dysfunctions Is the Subthalamic Nucleus Sleeping Under Nitrous Oxide–Ketamine General Anesthesia? Neurophysiological Treatment Effects of Mesdopetam, Pimavanserin and Amantadine in a Rodent Model of Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1