评估人工智能预测bpMRI图像特征预测前列腺癌侵袭性的可行性:一项多中心研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Insights into Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s13244-024-01865-8
Kexin Wang, Ning Luo, Zhaonan Sun, Xiangpeng Zhao, Lilan She, Zhangli Xing, Yuntian Chen, Chunlei He, Pengsheng Wu, Xiangpeng Wang, ZiXuan Kong
{"title":"评估人工智能预测bpMRI图像特征预测前列腺癌侵袭性的可行性:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Kexin Wang, Ning Luo, Zhaonan Sun, Xiangpeng Zhao, Lilan She, Zhangli Xing, Yuntian Chen, Chunlei He, Pengsheng Wu, Xiangpeng Wang, ZiXuan Kong","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01865-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of utilizing artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted biparametric MRI (bpMRI) image features for predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 878 PCa patients from 4 hospitals were retrospectively collected, all of whom had pathological results after radical prostatectomy (RP). A pre-trained AI algorithm was used to select suspected PCa lesions and extract lesion features for model development. The study evaluated five prediction methods, including (1) A clinical-imaging model of clinical features and image features of suspected PCa lesions selected by AI algorithm, (2) the PIRADS category, (3) a conventional radiomics model, (4) a deep-learning bases radiomics model, and (5) biopsy pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the externally validated dataset, the deep learning-based radiomics model showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.700 to 0.791). It exceeded the clinical-imaging model (AUC 0.597 to 0.718), conventional radiomic model (AUC 0.566 to 0.632), PIRADS score (AUC 0.554 to 0.613), and biopsy pathology (AUC 0.537 to 0.578). The AUC predicted by the model did not show a statistically significant difference among the three externally verified hospitals (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep-learning radiomics models utilizing AI-extracted image features from bpMRI images can potentially be used to predict PCa aggressiveness, demonstrating a generalized ability for external validation.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) is important for formulating the best treatment plan for patients. The radiomic model based on deep learning is expected to provide an objective and non-invasive method for evaluating the aggressiveness of PCa.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Predicting the aggressiveness of PCa is important for patients to obtain the best treatment options. The deep learning-based radiomics model can predict the aggressiveness of PCa with high accuracy. The model has good universality when tested on multiple external datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the feasibility of AI-predicted bpMRI image features for predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness: a multi-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Kexin Wang, Ning Luo, Zhaonan Sun, Xiangpeng Zhao, Lilan She, Zhangli Xing, Yuntian Chen, Chunlei He, Pengsheng Wu, Xiangpeng Wang, ZiXuan Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-024-01865-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of utilizing artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted biparametric MRI (bpMRI) image features for predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 878 PCa patients from 4 hospitals were retrospectively collected, all of whom had pathological results after radical prostatectomy (RP). A pre-trained AI algorithm was used to select suspected PCa lesions and extract lesion features for model development. The study evaluated five prediction methods, including (1) A clinical-imaging model of clinical features and image features of suspected PCa lesions selected by AI algorithm, (2) the PIRADS category, (3) a conventional radiomics model, (4) a deep-learning bases radiomics model, and (5) biopsy pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the externally validated dataset, the deep learning-based radiomics model showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.700 to 0.791). It exceeded the clinical-imaging model (AUC 0.597 to 0.718), conventional radiomic model (AUC 0.566 to 0.632), PIRADS score (AUC 0.554 to 0.613), and biopsy pathology (AUC 0.537 to 0.578). The AUC predicted by the model did not show a statistically significant difference among the three externally verified hospitals (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep-learning radiomics models utilizing AI-extracted image features from bpMRI images can potentially be used to predict PCa aggressiveness, demonstrating a generalized ability for external validation.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) is important for formulating the best treatment plan for patients. The radiomic model based on deep learning is expected to provide an objective and non-invasive method for evaluating the aggressiveness of PCa.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Predicting the aggressiveness of PCa is important for patients to obtain the best treatment options. The deep learning-based radiomics model can predict the aggressiveness of PCa with high accuracy. The model has good universality when tested on multiple external datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01865-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01865-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨利用人工智能(AI)预测双参数MRI (bpMRI)图像特征预测前列腺癌(PCa)侵袭性的可行性。材料与方法:回顾性收集4家医院878例根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后病理结果的前列腺癌患者。使用预训练的AI算法选择疑似PCa病变并提取病变特征进行模型开发。本研究评估了五种预测方法,包括:(1)人工智能算法选择的疑似PCa病变的临床特征和图像特征的临床影像模型,(2)PIRADS分类,(3)传统放射组学模型,(4)基于深度学习的放射组学模型,(5)活检病理学。结果:在外部验证的数据集中,基于深度学习的放射组学模型的曲线下面积最高(AUC为0.700 ~ 0.791)。超过了临床影像学模型(AUC 0.597 ~ 0.718)、常规放射学模型(AUC 0.566 ~ 0.632)、PIRADS评分(AUC 0.554 ~ 0.613)、活检病理(AUC 0.537 ~ 0.578)。模型预测的AUC在三家外部验证医院间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:利用人工智能从bpMRI图像中提取图像特征的深度学习放射组学模型可以潜在地用于预测前列腺癌的侵袭性,展示了一种广泛的外部验证能力。关键相关性声明:预测前列腺癌(PCa)的侵袭性对于制定最佳治疗方案至关重要。基于深度学习的放射学模型有望为前列腺癌侵袭性评估提供一种客观、无创的方法。重点:预测前列腺癌的侵袭性对患者获得最佳治疗方案很重要。基于深度学习的放射组学模型可以较准确地预测前列腺癌的侵袭性。在对多个外部数据集进行测试时,该模型具有良好的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the feasibility of AI-predicted bpMRI image features for predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness: a multi-center study.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of utilizing artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted biparametric MRI (bpMRI) image features for predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods: A total of 878 PCa patients from 4 hospitals were retrospectively collected, all of whom had pathological results after radical prostatectomy (RP). A pre-trained AI algorithm was used to select suspected PCa lesions and extract lesion features for model development. The study evaluated five prediction methods, including (1) A clinical-imaging model of clinical features and image features of suspected PCa lesions selected by AI algorithm, (2) the PIRADS category, (3) a conventional radiomics model, (4) a deep-learning bases radiomics model, and (5) biopsy pathology.

Results: In the externally validated dataset, the deep learning-based radiomics model showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.700 to 0.791). It exceeded the clinical-imaging model (AUC 0.597 to 0.718), conventional radiomic model (AUC 0.566 to 0.632), PIRADS score (AUC 0.554 to 0.613), and biopsy pathology (AUC 0.537 to 0.578). The AUC predicted by the model did not show a statistically significant difference among the three externally verified hospitals (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Deep-learning radiomics models utilizing AI-extracted image features from bpMRI images can potentially be used to predict PCa aggressiveness, demonstrating a generalized ability for external validation.

Critical relevance statement: Predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) is important for formulating the best treatment plan for patients. The radiomic model based on deep learning is expected to provide an objective and non-invasive method for evaluating the aggressiveness of PCa.

Key points: Predicting the aggressiveness of PCa is important for patients to obtain the best treatment options. The deep learning-based radiomics model can predict the aggressiveness of PCa with high accuracy. The model has good universality when tested on multiple external datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency ablation for peribiliary hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score matching analysis. A machine learning model based on preoperative multiparametric quantitative DWI can effectively predict the survival and recurrence risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Assessing the perceived impact of ESOR training programs on radiologists' professional development. Charting a sustainable future in radiology: evaluating radiologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward environmental responsibility. Diagnosis of adult midgut malrotation in CT: sign of absent retromesenteric duodenum reliable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1