社区癌症诊所对癌症治疗后幸存者抑郁和焦虑的步进式远程医疗干预的多站点可行性研究(WF-30917CD)。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s11764-024-01721-0
Suzanne C Danhauer, Gretchen A Brenes, Kathryn E Weaver, Emily V Dressler, Grace Westcott, Zhang Zhang, Lingyi Lu, Cheyenne R Wagi, Rakhee Vaidya, Amarinthia Curtis, Pamala A Pawloski, Sara Adams, Glenn J Lesser, Janet A Tooze
{"title":"社区癌症诊所对癌症治疗后幸存者抑郁和焦虑的步进式远程医疗干预的多站点可行性研究(WF-30917CD)。","authors":"Suzanne C Danhauer, Gretchen A Brenes, Kathryn E Weaver, Emily V Dressler, Grace Westcott, Zhang Zhang, Lingyi Lu, Cheyenne R Wagi, Rakhee Vaidya, Amarinthia Curtis, Pamala A Pawloski, Sara Adams, Glenn J Lesser, Janet A Tooze","doi":"10.1007/s11764-024-01721-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This feasibility study estimated accrual, retention, adherence, and summarized preliminary efficacy data from a stepped-care telehealth intervention for cancer survivors with moderate or severe levels of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to intervention or enhanced usual care (stratified by symptom severity). In the intervention group, those with moderate symptoms received a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) workbook/6 bi-weekly check-in calls (low intensity) and severe symptoms received the workbook/12 weekly therapy sessions (high intensity). Depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), fear of recurrence, and cancer-related distress were assessed pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 68; ages 36-82; 88% White) were randomized to telehealth (n = 34) or enhanced usual care (EUC, n = 34), stratified by symptoms (moderate, n = 38; severe, n = 30). Accrual was 1.8/month with 88% retention and > 75% adherence. For those with moderate symptoms, the low-intensity intervention was associated with better cancer-related distress post-intervention but worse fatigue, insomnia, and physical QOL and and minimal differences for anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, and mental QOL compared with EUC using clinically meaningful values to assess differences. For those with severe symptoms, the high-intensity intervention was associated with better fatigue, fear of recurrence, cancer-related distress, and physical/mental QOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accrual to a stepped-care telehealth intervention for distressed cancer survivors was lower than expected, but retention and adherence were strong. Data suggest potential impact of the high-intensity intervention.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>A telephone-based CBT intervention where cancer survivors worked with a therapist yielded improvements in fatigue, fear of recurrence, distress, and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-site feasibility study of a stepped-care telehealth intervention for depression and anxiety in post-treatment cancer survivors at community cancer clinics (WF-30917CD).\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne C Danhauer, Gretchen A Brenes, Kathryn E Weaver, Emily V Dressler, Grace Westcott, Zhang Zhang, Lingyi Lu, Cheyenne R Wagi, Rakhee Vaidya, Amarinthia Curtis, Pamala A Pawloski, Sara Adams, Glenn J Lesser, Janet A Tooze\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11764-024-01721-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This feasibility study estimated accrual, retention, adherence, and summarized preliminary efficacy data from a stepped-care telehealth intervention for cancer survivors with moderate or severe levels of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to intervention or enhanced usual care (stratified by symptom severity). In the intervention group, those with moderate symptoms received a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) workbook/6 bi-weekly check-in calls (low intensity) and severe symptoms received the workbook/12 weekly therapy sessions (high intensity). Depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), fear of recurrence, and cancer-related distress were assessed pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 68; ages 36-82; 88% White) were randomized to telehealth (n = 34) or enhanced usual care (EUC, n = 34), stratified by symptoms (moderate, n = 38; severe, n = 30). Accrual was 1.8/month with 88% retention and > 75% adherence. For those with moderate symptoms, the low-intensity intervention was associated with better cancer-related distress post-intervention but worse fatigue, insomnia, and physical QOL and and minimal differences for anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, and mental QOL compared with EUC using clinically meaningful values to assess differences. For those with severe symptoms, the high-intensity intervention was associated with better fatigue, fear of recurrence, cancer-related distress, and physical/mental QOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accrual to a stepped-care telehealth intervention for distressed cancer survivors was lower than expected, but retention and adherence were strong. Data suggest potential impact of the high-intensity intervention.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>A telephone-based CBT intervention where cancer survivors worked with a therapist yielded improvements in fatigue, fear of recurrence, distress, and quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01721-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01721-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本可行性研究对具有中度或重度焦虑和/或抑郁症状的癌症幸存者进行步进式远程医疗干预的累积、保留、依从性进行了评估,并总结了初步疗效数据。方法:参与者随机分为干预组或强化常规护理组(按症状严重程度分层)。在干预组中,那些有中度症状的人接受认知行为治疗(CBT)工作簿/每两周6次检查电话(低强度),症状严重的人接受工作簿/每周12次治疗(高强度)。在干预前后分别评估抑郁、焦虑、失眠、疲劳、生活质量(QOL)、对复发的恐惧和癌症相关的痛苦。结果:受试者(N = 68;年龄36 - 82;88%白人)随机分配到远程医疗(n = 34)或强化常规护理(EUC, n = 34),按症状分层(中度,n = 38;重度,n = 30)。累计为1.8个/月,保留率为88%,依从率为75%。对于那些有中度症状的患者,低强度干预与干预后的癌症相关痛苦有关,但与EUC相比,疲劳、失眠和身体生活质量更差,焦虑、抑郁、复发恐惧和精神生活质量的差异很小,使用临床有意义的值来评估差异。对于那些症状严重的患者,高强度干预与更好的疲劳、对复发的恐惧、癌症相关的痛苦和身体/精神生活质量相关。结论:对痛苦的癌症幸存者进行分步护理远程医疗干预的应计收益低于预期,但保留和依从性很强。数据显示了高强度干预的潜在影响。对癌症幸存者的启示:一种基于电话的CBT干预,癌症幸存者与治疗师一起工作,在疲劳、对复发的恐惧、痛苦和生活质量方面取得了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multi-site feasibility study of a stepped-care telehealth intervention for depression and anxiety in post-treatment cancer survivors at community cancer clinics (WF-30917CD).

Purpose: This feasibility study estimated accrual, retention, adherence, and summarized preliminary efficacy data from a stepped-care telehealth intervention for cancer survivors with moderate or severe levels of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms.

Methods: Participants were randomized to intervention or enhanced usual care (stratified by symptom severity). In the intervention group, those with moderate symptoms received a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) workbook/6 bi-weekly check-in calls (low intensity) and severe symptoms received the workbook/12 weekly therapy sessions (high intensity). Depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), fear of recurrence, and cancer-related distress were assessed pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Participants (N = 68; ages 36-82; 88% White) were randomized to telehealth (n = 34) or enhanced usual care (EUC, n = 34), stratified by symptoms (moderate, n = 38; severe, n = 30). Accrual was 1.8/month with 88% retention and > 75% adherence. For those with moderate symptoms, the low-intensity intervention was associated with better cancer-related distress post-intervention but worse fatigue, insomnia, and physical QOL and and minimal differences for anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, and mental QOL compared with EUC using clinically meaningful values to assess differences. For those with severe symptoms, the high-intensity intervention was associated with better fatigue, fear of recurrence, cancer-related distress, and physical/mental QOL.

Conclusions: Accrual to a stepped-care telehealth intervention for distressed cancer survivors was lower than expected, but retention and adherence were strong. Data suggest potential impact of the high-intensity intervention.

Implications for cancer survivors: A telephone-based CBT intervention where cancer survivors worked with a therapist yielded improvements in fatigue, fear of recurrence, distress, and quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to improve participation in exercise programmes during chemotherapy: a modified nominal group technique. Organizing substitution of oncological follow-up to primary care: perspectives from secondary care providers. Beyond survival: the journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice (JCS). Short-term employment changes of men newly diagnosed with cancer: well-being of cancer survivors at work study (WeCanWork). What does an AI-generated "cancer survivor" look like? An analysis of images generated by text-to-image tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1