口服皮质类固醇的使用经验和不良反应:全国哮喘患者的横断面调查。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S487743
Arwel W Jones, Vanessa M McDonald, Rebecca F McLoughlin, Teresa M Vella, Anthony W Flynn, John D Blakey, Luke Wolfenden, Mark Hew, John W Upham, Dennis Thomas, Philip Bardin, Anne E Holland
{"title":"口服皮质类固醇的使用经验和不良反应:全国哮喘患者的横断面调查。","authors":"Arwel W Jones, Vanessa M McDonald, Rebecca F McLoughlin, Teresa M Vella, Anthony W Flynn, John D Blakey, Luke Wolfenden, Mark Hew, John W Upham, Dennis Thomas, Philip Bardin, Anne E Holland","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S487743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are an effective treatment for severe uncontrolled asthma or asthma exacerbations, but frequent bursts or long-term use carry serious and sometimes irreversible adverse effects, or complications such as adrenal insufficiency upon discontinuation. Our aim was to survey people with asthma on their experiences of, and attitudes towards, using OCS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was a national descriptive cross-sectional survey of people with asthma in Australia. An anonymous survey was hosted online with invitations to participate distributed by national consumer peak bodies. Survey free-text responses were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to elicit determinants of OCS use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1808 people with asthma participated between 3 and 16 May 2022. Most common reasons for using OCS were severe asthma symptoms (40%), doctor prescription (38%) or asthma action plan recommendations (20%). Approximately 55% of people had experienced adverse effects from OCS use. Commonly reported adverse effects were trouble sleeping (69%), weight gain (56%) and mood problems (41%). Of people who had OCS at home or an OCS script, 44% did not have an action plan that described when and how they should take them. People (33%) did not feel well informed about OCS adverse effects from their healthcare team. People had varied awareness (3-65%) of current available strategies to reduce OCS use. 'Knowledge', 'Environmental context and resources' and 'Social influences' were the most coded TDF domains influencing OCS use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse effects of OCS use are common. People with asthma are not adequately informed about optimal OCS use or strategies to reduce overuse. These findings can help guide the implementation of OCS stewardship initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of Oral Corticosteroid Use and Adverse Effects: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of People with Asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Arwel W Jones, Vanessa M McDonald, Rebecca F McLoughlin, Teresa M Vella, Anthony W Flynn, John D Blakey, Luke Wolfenden, Mark Hew, John W Upham, Dennis Thomas, Philip Bardin, Anne E Holland\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S487743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are an effective treatment for severe uncontrolled asthma or asthma exacerbations, but frequent bursts or long-term use carry serious and sometimes irreversible adverse effects, or complications such as adrenal insufficiency upon discontinuation. Our aim was to survey people with asthma on their experiences of, and attitudes towards, using OCS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was a national descriptive cross-sectional survey of people with asthma in Australia. An anonymous survey was hosted online with invitations to participate distributed by national consumer peak bodies. Survey free-text responses were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to elicit determinants of OCS use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1808 people with asthma participated between 3 and 16 May 2022. Most common reasons for using OCS were severe asthma symptoms (40%), doctor prescription (38%) or asthma action plan recommendations (20%). Approximately 55% of people had experienced adverse effects from OCS use. Commonly reported adverse effects were trouble sleeping (69%), weight gain (56%) and mood problems (41%). Of people who had OCS at home or an OCS script, 44% did not have an action plan that described when and how they should take them. People (33%) did not feel well informed about OCS adverse effects from their healthcare team. People had varied awareness (3-65%) of current available strategies to reduce OCS use. 'Knowledge', 'Environmental context and resources' and 'Social influences' were the most coded TDF domains influencing OCS use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse effects of OCS use are common. People with asthma are not adequately informed about optimal OCS use or strategies to reduce overuse. These findings can help guide the implementation of OCS stewardship initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"75-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S487743\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S487743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:口服皮质类固醇(OCS)是治疗严重失控哮喘或哮喘加重的有效方法,但频繁使用或长期使用会产生严重的、有时是不可逆的不良反应,或在停药后出现肾上腺功能不全等并发症。我们的目的是调查哮喘患者使用 OCS 的经历和态度:本研究是一项针对澳大利亚哮喘患者的全国性描述性横断面调查。这项匿名调查是在网上进行的,由国家消费者高峰机构发出参与邀请。调查中的自由文本回答根据理论领域框架(TDF)进行编码,以了解使用OCS的决定因素:1808名哮喘患者在2022年5月3日至16日期间参与了调查。使用OCS的最常见原因是严重的哮喘症状(40%)、医生处方(38%)或哮喘行动计划建议(20%)。约 55% 的人在使用 OCS 后出现过不良反应。常见的不良反应是失眠(69%)、体重增加(56%)和情绪问题(41%)。家中有配方或配方脚本的人中,44%没有制定行动计划,说明何时和如何服用。有 33% 的人认为他们的医疗团队没有很好地告知他们有关服用 OCS 的不良反应。人们(3%-65%)对目前可用的减少使用其他儿童辅助用药的策略认识不一。知识"、"环境背景和资源 "和 "社会影响 "是影响OCS使用的编码最多的TDF领域:结论:使用开放性哮喘治疗方案的不良影响很常见。哮喘患者没有充分了解最佳使用开放式CS的方法或减少过度使用的策略。这些发现有助于指导开放性治疗方案管理措施的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences of Oral Corticosteroid Use and Adverse Effects: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of People with Asthma.

Purpose: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are an effective treatment for severe uncontrolled asthma or asthma exacerbations, but frequent bursts or long-term use carry serious and sometimes irreversible adverse effects, or complications such as adrenal insufficiency upon discontinuation. Our aim was to survey people with asthma on their experiences of, and attitudes towards, using OCS.

Patients and methods: This study was a national descriptive cross-sectional survey of people with asthma in Australia. An anonymous survey was hosted online with invitations to participate distributed by national consumer peak bodies. Survey free-text responses were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to elicit determinants of OCS use.

Results: 1808 people with asthma participated between 3 and 16 May 2022. Most common reasons for using OCS were severe asthma symptoms (40%), doctor prescription (38%) or asthma action plan recommendations (20%). Approximately 55% of people had experienced adverse effects from OCS use. Commonly reported adverse effects were trouble sleeping (69%), weight gain (56%) and mood problems (41%). Of people who had OCS at home or an OCS script, 44% did not have an action plan that described when and how they should take them. People (33%) did not feel well informed about OCS adverse effects from their healthcare team. People had varied awareness (3-65%) of current available strategies to reduce OCS use. 'Knowledge', 'Environmental context and resources' and 'Social influences' were the most coded TDF domains influencing OCS use.

Conclusion: Adverse effects of OCS use are common. People with asthma are not adequately informed about optimal OCS use or strategies to reduce overuse. These findings can help guide the implementation of OCS stewardship initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Adherence Definitions, Measurement Modalities, and Psychometric Properties in HIV, Diabetes, and Nutritional Supplementation Studies: A Scoping Review. Implementing a Care Model for Bedridden Stroke Survivors: A Qualitative Study in Northeastern Thailand. Experiences and Perspectives of Medication Information and Use Among Arabic-Speaking Migrant Women in Sweden: A Multistage Focus Group Study. Gender Preferences in Healthcare: A Study of Saudi Patients' Physician Preferences. The Lived Experience of Adult Cancer Survivors After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Qualitative Study From Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1