Cedric Hermans , Michiel Coppens , Giuliana Ventriglia , Gavin Ling , Michaela Lehle , Steven W. Pipe
{"title":"将卫生公平扩展到中度和轻度血友病A患者:重新审视HAVEN 6试验","authors":"Cedric Hermans , Michiel Coppens , Giuliana Ventriglia , Gavin Ling , Michaela Lehle , Steven W. Pipe","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Congenital hemophilia A (HA) disease severity has traditionally been categorized according to intrinsic factor (F)VIII levels, with <1% of normal indicating severe HA, 1% to 5% moderate HA, and 6% to 40% mild HA. However, mounting evidence illustrates considerable variability in bleeding phenotype regardless of FVIII level. Despite treatment advances, people with moderate or mild HA may be neglected, as treatment guidelines and established norms focus on FVIII levels, and many clinical trials do not include people with FVIII > 1%. Data from the HAVEN 6 trial demonstrated that people with moderate or mild HA, for whom prophylaxis was warranted by the treating physician’s judgment, experienced a clear clinical benefit from receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. A shift in treatment paradigms to incorporate clinical phenotypes alongside FVIII levels should be encouraged. This change in practice would allow treaters to extend health equity to people with moderate or mild HA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 102648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending health equity to people with moderate and mild hemophilia A: revisiting the HAVEN 6 trial\",\"authors\":\"Cedric Hermans , Michiel Coppens , Giuliana Ventriglia , Gavin Ling , Michaela Lehle , Steven W. Pipe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Congenital hemophilia A (HA) disease severity has traditionally been categorized according to intrinsic factor (F)VIII levels, with <1% of normal indicating severe HA, 1% to 5% moderate HA, and 6% to 40% mild HA. However, mounting evidence illustrates considerable variability in bleeding phenotype regardless of FVIII level. Despite treatment advances, people with moderate or mild HA may be neglected, as treatment guidelines and established norms focus on FVIII levels, and many clinical trials do not include people with FVIII > 1%. Data from the HAVEN 6 trial demonstrated that people with moderate or mild HA, for whom prophylaxis was warranted by the treating physician’s judgment, experienced a clear clinical benefit from receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. A shift in treatment paradigms to incorporate clinical phenotypes alongside FVIII levels should be encouraged. This change in practice would allow treaters to extend health equity to people with moderate or mild HA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924003431\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924003431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
先天性甲型血友病(HA)的病情严重程度传统上是根据内在因子(F)VIII 的水平来划分的,其比例为 1%。HAVEN 6试验的数据表明,根据主治医生的判断,中度或轻度HA患者在接受埃米珠单抗预防治疗后可获得明显的临床获益。应鼓励改变治疗模式,将临床表型与 FVIII 水平结合起来。这种做法的改变将使治疗者能够将健康公平扩展到中度或轻度 HA 患者。
Extending health equity to people with moderate and mild hemophilia A: revisiting the HAVEN 6 trial
Congenital hemophilia A (HA) disease severity has traditionally been categorized according to intrinsic factor (F)VIII levels, with <1% of normal indicating severe HA, 1% to 5% moderate HA, and 6% to 40% mild HA. However, mounting evidence illustrates considerable variability in bleeding phenotype regardless of FVIII level. Despite treatment advances, people with moderate or mild HA may be neglected, as treatment guidelines and established norms focus on FVIII levels, and many clinical trials do not include people with FVIII > 1%. Data from the HAVEN 6 trial demonstrated that people with moderate or mild HA, for whom prophylaxis was warranted by the treating physician’s judgment, experienced a clear clinical benefit from receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. A shift in treatment paradigms to incorporate clinical phenotypes alongside FVIII levels should be encouraged. This change in practice would allow treaters to extend health equity to people with moderate or mild HA.