解开链条:探索所有权对养老院管理人员更替的影响。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000426
Rohit Pradhan, Akbar Ghiasi, Gregory Orewa, Shivani Gupta, Robert Weech-Maldonado
{"title":"解开链条:探索所有权对养老院管理人员更替的影响。","authors":"Rohit Pradhan, Akbar Ghiasi, Gregory Orewa, Shivani Gupta, Robert Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leadership instability in nursing homes marked by high administrator turnover threatens the well-being of vulnerable residents. Although numerous factors have been implicated, the role of ownership remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Based upon the tenets from institutional theory and strategic management theory, the primary goal of this study was to examine the impact of ownership on administrator turnover.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Data were derived from different sources: LTCFocus.org , Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System, and Area Health Resources Files (2021-2022). The dependent variable was administrator turnover categorized as follows: 0 = no administrators left, 1 = one administrator left, and 2 = two or more administrators left. The primary independent variable was ownership/chain affiliation categorized as four possible interactions of for-profit (FP) status and chain affiliation: not-for-profit (NFP) independent, FP independent, NFP chain, and FP chain. An ordinal logistic regression model was used, and predicted turnover probabilities were calculated across the four ownership categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary hypothesis was supported and compared to NFP independent, FP chain, FP independent, and NFP chain nursing homes that exhibited approximately 2.3, 1.7, and 1.4 times higher odds of administrator turnover. Predicted probabilities confirmed these trends: FP chain nursing homes had the lowest retention, with a 42% probability of no turnover, 32% for one administrator leaving, and 26% for two or more leaving. In contrast, NFP independent facilities had the highest retention rates, with a 62% chance of no turnover, 25% for one leaving, and 13% for two or more. Differences between groups were statistically significant ( p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FP chain ownership was associated with the highest administrator turnover rates, whereas NFP facilities experienced the lowest. FP independent and NFP chain homes had intermediate probabilities of administrator turnover.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Tailoring management strategies to the specific ownership structure may reduce administrator turnover and ensure consistent resident care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling the chains: Exploring the impact of ownership on administrator turnover in nursing homes.\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Pradhan, Akbar Ghiasi, Gregory Orewa, Shivani Gupta, Robert Weech-Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leadership instability in nursing homes marked by high administrator turnover threatens the well-being of vulnerable residents. Although numerous factors have been implicated, the role of ownership remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Based upon the tenets from institutional theory and strategic management theory, the primary goal of this study was to examine the impact of ownership on administrator turnover.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Data were derived from different sources: LTCFocus.org , Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System, and Area Health Resources Files (2021-2022). The dependent variable was administrator turnover categorized as follows: 0 = no administrators left, 1 = one administrator left, and 2 = two or more administrators left. The primary independent variable was ownership/chain affiliation categorized as four possible interactions of for-profit (FP) status and chain affiliation: not-for-profit (NFP) independent, FP independent, NFP chain, and FP chain. An ordinal logistic regression model was used, and predicted turnover probabilities were calculated across the four ownership categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary hypothesis was supported and compared to NFP independent, FP chain, FP independent, and NFP chain nursing homes that exhibited approximately 2.3, 1.7, and 1.4 times higher odds of administrator turnover. Predicted probabilities confirmed these trends: FP chain nursing homes had the lowest retention, with a 42% probability of no turnover, 32% for one administrator leaving, and 26% for two or more leaving. In contrast, NFP independent facilities had the highest retention rates, with a 62% chance of no turnover, 25% for one leaving, and 13% for two or more. Differences between groups were statistically significant ( p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FP chain ownership was associated with the highest administrator turnover rates, whereas NFP facilities experienced the lowest. FP independent and NFP chain homes had intermediate probabilities of administrator turnover.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Tailoring management strategies to the specific ownership structure may reduce administrator turnover and ensure consistent resident care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000426\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:养老院的领导不稳定以高管理人员的更替为特征,威胁着弱势居民的福祉。虽然牵涉到许多因素,但所有权的作用仍未得到探讨。目的:基于制度理论和战略管理理论的基本原理,本研究的主要目的是考察所有权对管理者离职的影响。方法/方法:数据来源于不同的来源:LTCFocus.org、养老院五星级质量评级系统和区域卫生资源文件(2021-2022)。因变量是管理员离职,分类如下:0 =没有管理员离职,1 =一名管理员离职,2 =两名或两名以上管理员离职。主要的自变量是所有权/链隶属关系,分为营利性(FP)状态和链隶属关系的四种可能的相互作用:非营利性(NFP)独立、FP独立、NFP链和FP链。采用有序逻辑回归模型,计算了四种所有权类别的预测离职概率。结果:主要假设得到了支持,并与NFP独立、FP连锁、FP独立和NFP连锁养老院进行了比较,这些养老院的管理人员离职率分别高出约2.3倍、1.7倍和1.4倍。预测的概率证实了这些趋势:计划生育连锁养老院的留任率最低,没有离职的概率为42%,一名管理人员离职的概率为32%,两名或更多管理人员离职的概率为26%。相比之下,NFP独立设施的保留率最高,62%的人没有离职,25%的人离职,13%的人离职或更多。组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:计划生育连锁所有制与最高的管理人员流失率相关,而非计划生育机构的管理人员流失率最低。非计划生育独立家庭和非计划生育连锁家庭的管理人员离职概率居中。实践启示:定制管理策略,以特定的所有权结构可以减少管理人员的更替,并确保一致的居民护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unraveling the chains: Exploring the impact of ownership on administrator turnover in nursing homes.

Background: Leadership instability in nursing homes marked by high administrator turnover threatens the well-being of vulnerable residents. Although numerous factors have been implicated, the role of ownership remains unexplored.

Purposes: Based upon the tenets from institutional theory and strategic management theory, the primary goal of this study was to examine the impact of ownership on administrator turnover.

Methodology/approach: Data were derived from different sources: LTCFocus.org , Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System, and Area Health Resources Files (2021-2022). The dependent variable was administrator turnover categorized as follows: 0 = no administrators left, 1 = one administrator left, and 2 = two or more administrators left. The primary independent variable was ownership/chain affiliation categorized as four possible interactions of for-profit (FP) status and chain affiliation: not-for-profit (NFP) independent, FP independent, NFP chain, and FP chain. An ordinal logistic regression model was used, and predicted turnover probabilities were calculated across the four ownership categories.

Results: The primary hypothesis was supported and compared to NFP independent, FP chain, FP independent, and NFP chain nursing homes that exhibited approximately 2.3, 1.7, and 1.4 times higher odds of administrator turnover. Predicted probabilities confirmed these trends: FP chain nursing homes had the lowest retention, with a 42% probability of no turnover, 32% for one administrator leaving, and 26% for two or more leaving. In contrast, NFP independent facilities had the highest retention rates, with a 62% chance of no turnover, 25% for one leaving, and 13% for two or more. Differences between groups were statistically significant ( p < .001).

Conclusion: FP chain ownership was associated with the highest administrator turnover rates, whereas NFP facilities experienced the lowest. FP independent and NFP chain homes had intermediate probabilities of administrator turnover.

Practice implications: Tailoring management strategies to the specific ownership structure may reduce administrator turnover and ensure consistent resident care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Relating digitalization and quality management in health care organizations: A systematic review. From the backroom to the boardroom: Health care chief information officers, stereotypes, and strategic leadership in the digital transformation era. Need of the hour: A service failure recovery reorientation for U.S. hospitals. The complementary effects of formal and informal budgetary performance feedback on doctor-managers' responsibilities. Exploring performance profiles of home health care agencies: A two-stage analytical approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1