Visual outcomes of central retinal artery occlusion: Exploring treatment strategies beyond the conventional time window

Backgrounds/Aims

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a vision-devastating emergency. However, widely-acknowledged treatment consensus is lacking and prehospital delays commonly occur. Hence, we aimed to investigate the visual outcomes of conservative treatments (CT), local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for non-arteritic CRAO (NA-CRAO) patients beyond the conventional time window.

Methods

This retrospective comparative study included 99 NA-CRAO patients followed up for over 6 months. The subjects were divided into three groups: the CT (50 patients), LIF (10 patients) and HBO group (39 patients). The primary endpoint was the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change at 6 months compared to baseline. The secondary endpoint was the improvement in BCVA at 1 year and final visits.

Results

No heterogeneity regarding demographics was identified. However, the HBO group had a more extended time-to-treatment period (median 6.0 days) and more advanced-stage CRAO cases (41 % stage III) than the CT (median 4.0 days, 14 % stage III) and LIF (median 0.6 days, 20 % stage III) groups. Despite this, the HBO group exhibited a significantly greater BCVA and a higher proportion of patients achieving significant vision improvement than those in the CT group at 6-, 12-month and final exams (51.3 % vs. 24.0 %, P < 0.05). The LIF appeared to improve outcomes more than CT over time without significance.

Conclusion

Our study provided a concurrent comparison across 3 approaches and demonstrated that HBO therapy beyond the time window remained more effective in improving vision than CT alone for NA-CRAO patients, which had not been proposed by prior studies.