系统性炎症反应指数(SIRI)及其他母体生化指标在确定妊娠肝内胆汁淤积严重程度中的作用。

Derya Kanza Gul, Nihal Callioglu
{"title":"系统性炎症反应指数(SIRI)及其他母体生化指标在确定妊娠肝内胆汁淤积严重程度中的作用。","authors":"Derya Kanza Gul, Nihal Callioglu","doi":"10.5603/gpl.102459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the roles of the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and other biochemical markers obtained from maternal blood in determining the diagnosis and severity of pregnancy cholestasis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, a total of 815 pregnant women including 546 healthy pregnant women [serum total bile acid (TBA) level < 10 μmol/L, control group], 185 patients with mild cholestasis [serum TBA level < 40 μmol/L, mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) group] and 84 patients with severe cholestasis (serum TBA level ≥ 40 μmol/L, severe ICP group) were evaluated. The groups were compared regarding demographic data, clinical characteristics, SIRI (neutrophilcount*monocytecount/lymphocyte count), and other laboratory data. Cut-off values that could predict ICP were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were found to be statistically significantly higher in the severe ICP group compared with the control group and mild ICP group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). The best SIRI cut-off value was 2.3302 (60.3% sensitivity and 52.2% specificity) [area under the curve: 0.590 ± 0.023, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.546-0.634; p < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIRI may be a useful marker in determining the diagnosis and severity of ICP. However, were commend that studies be conducted in larger groups and indifferent trimesters.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and other maternal biochemical markers in determining the severity of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Derya Kanza Gul, Nihal Callioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.102459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the roles of the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and other biochemical markers obtained from maternal blood in determining the diagnosis and severity of pregnancy cholestasis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, a total of 815 pregnant women including 546 healthy pregnant women [serum total bile acid (TBA) level < 10 μmol/L, control group], 185 patients with mild cholestasis [serum TBA level < 40 μmol/L, mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) group] and 84 patients with severe cholestasis (serum TBA level ≥ 40 μmol/L, severe ICP group) were evaluated. The groups were compared regarding demographic data, clinical characteristics, SIRI (neutrophilcount*monocytecount/lymphocyte count), and other laboratory data. Cut-off values that could predict ICP were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were found to be statistically significantly higher in the severe ICP group compared with the control group and mild ICP group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). The best SIRI cut-off value was 2.3302 (60.3% sensitivity and 52.2% specificity) [area under the curve: 0.590 ± 0.023, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.546-0.634; p < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIRI may be a useful marker in determining the diagnosis and severity of ICP. However, were commend that studies be conducted in larger groups and indifferent trimesters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.102459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.102459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨母体血中系统性炎症反应指数(SIRI)等生化指标在妊娠期胆汁淤积症诊断及严重程度中的作用。材料与方法:本回顾性病例对照研究共815例孕妇,其中健康孕妇546例[血清总胆汁酸(TBA)水平< 10 μmol/L,对照组],轻度胆汁淤积患者185例[血清TBA水平< 40 μmol/L,轻度妊娠肝内胆汁淤积(ICP)组],重度胆汁淤积患者84例(血清TBA水平≥40 μmol/L,重度ICP组)。比较两组的人口学数据、临床特征、中性粒细胞计数*单核细胞计数/淋巴细胞计数(SIRI)和其他实验室数据。计算可以预测ICP的截止值。结果:重度ICP组平均中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)均高于对照组和轻度ICP组,差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.01和p < 0.05)。最佳SIRI截断值为2.3302(灵敏度为60.3%,特异性为52.2%)[曲线下面积:0.590±0.023,95%可信区间(CI): 0.546-0.634;P < 0.001]。结论:SIRI可能是确定ICP诊断和严重程度的有用标志物。然而,我们推荐在更大的群体和不同的孕期进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and other maternal biochemical markers in determining the severity of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Objectives: To investigate the roles of the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and other biochemical markers obtained from maternal blood in determining the diagnosis and severity of pregnancy cholestasis.

Material and methods: In this retrospective case-control study, a total of 815 pregnant women including 546 healthy pregnant women [serum total bile acid (TBA) level < 10 μmol/L, control group], 185 patients with mild cholestasis [serum TBA level < 40 μmol/L, mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) group] and 84 patients with severe cholestasis (serum TBA level ≥ 40 μmol/L, severe ICP group) were evaluated. The groups were compared regarding demographic data, clinical characteristics, SIRI (neutrophilcount*monocytecount/lymphocyte count), and other laboratory data. Cut-off values that could predict ICP were calculated.

Results: The average neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were found to be statistically significantly higher in the severe ICP group compared with the control group and mild ICP group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). The best SIRI cut-off value was 2.3302 (60.3% sensitivity and 52.2% specificity) [area under the curve: 0.590 ± 0.023, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.546-0.634; p < 0.001].

Conclusions: SIRI may be a useful marker in determining the diagnosis and severity of ICP. However, were commend that studies be conducted in larger groups and indifferent trimesters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of blunt and sharp dissection techniques during cesarean hysterectomy in placenta percreta. Comparison of the efficacy of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy for type II/III cesarean scar pregnancy. Comparison of VCare and SecuFix uterine manipulator in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Evaluating the impact of red blood cell parameters on outcomes of dinoprostone-induced labor: a retrospective study. Maternal obesity, more than diabetes mellitus, predisposes to soft tissue injuries of the birth canal during vaginal delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1