基于物理模型的粉煤灰堆积层大断面双拱隧道序贯开挖稳定性评价

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2025.106391
Tao Yu, Kaichen Ying, Jianfeng Wang, Zhigang Yao, Yong Fang
{"title":"基于物理模型的粉煤灰堆积层大断面双拱隧道序贯开挖稳定性评价","authors":"Tao Yu,&nbsp;Kaichen Ying,&nbsp;Jianfeng Wang,&nbsp;Zhigang Yao,&nbsp;Yong Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is no precedent for the construction of large-section double-arch tunnels in fly ash accumulation stratum in China. The fly ash stratum is characterized by a loose structure, poor cementation, and low bearing capacity, which present significant challenges in tunnel design and construction. Based on the Yanpingba tunnel project, this paper conducts a model test on a large-section double-arch tunnel crossing a fly ash accumulation stratum, analyzing the tunnel’s mechanical behavior under various sequential excavation methods. The results show a large settlement of the vault and upper stratum of the double-arch tunnel excavated in the fly ash accumulation stratum. In addition, the stratum can easily become unstable, so it is necessary to reinforce the stratum by grouting. Compared with the subsequent tunnel, the advance tunnel is more affected by excavation, and the risk of structural damage is higher. Compared with the central diaphragm (CD) method and the bench method, the single side drift method is more conducive to safe construction. A mid-partition wall can effectively reduce the settlement of the stratum, but it is easily deflected to the side by the bias pressure. Adding support on the side of the advance tunnel of the mid-partition wall is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 106391"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability evaluation of the sequential excavation method of large-section double-arch tunnel in fly ash accumulation stratum through physical model\",\"authors\":\"Tao Yu,&nbsp;Kaichen Ying,&nbsp;Jianfeng Wang,&nbsp;Zhigang Yao,&nbsp;Yong Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is no precedent for the construction of large-section double-arch tunnels in fly ash accumulation stratum in China. The fly ash stratum is characterized by a loose structure, poor cementation, and low bearing capacity, which present significant challenges in tunnel design and construction. Based on the Yanpingba tunnel project, this paper conducts a model test on a large-section double-arch tunnel crossing a fly ash accumulation stratum, analyzing the tunnel’s mechanical behavior under various sequential excavation methods. The results show a large settlement of the vault and upper stratum of the double-arch tunnel excavated in the fly ash accumulation stratum. In addition, the stratum can easily become unstable, so it is necessary to reinforce the stratum by grouting. Compared with the subsequent tunnel, the advance tunnel is more affected by excavation, and the risk of structural damage is higher. Compared with the central diaphragm (CD) method and the bench method, the single side drift method is more conducive to safe construction. A mid-partition wall can effectively reduce the settlement of the stratum, but it is easily deflected to the side by the bias pressure. Adding support on the side of the advance tunnel of the mid-partition wall is recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088677982500029X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088677982500029X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在粉煤灰堆积层中施工大断面双拱隧道,国内尚无先例。粉煤灰地层结构松散,胶结性差,承载能力低,给隧道设计和施工带来了很大的挑战。本文以延坪坝隧道工程为基础,对穿越粉煤灰堆积层的大断面双拱隧道进行了模型试验,分析了不同顺序开挖方式下隧道的力学性能。结果表明:在粉煤灰堆积层中开挖的双拱隧道拱顶和上部地层存在较大的沉降。此外,地层易失稳,因此有必要对地层进行注浆加固。与后发隧道相比,超前隧道受开挖影响更大,结构破坏风险更高。与中央膜片法和台架法相比,单边漂移法更有利于安全施工。中间隔墙可以有效地减少地层的沉降,但在偏压作用下容易向一侧偏转。建议在中隔墙超前隧道一侧增加支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stability evaluation of the sequential excavation method of large-section double-arch tunnel in fly ash accumulation stratum through physical model
There is no precedent for the construction of large-section double-arch tunnels in fly ash accumulation stratum in China. The fly ash stratum is characterized by a loose structure, poor cementation, and low bearing capacity, which present significant challenges in tunnel design and construction. Based on the Yanpingba tunnel project, this paper conducts a model test on a large-section double-arch tunnel crossing a fly ash accumulation stratum, analyzing the tunnel’s mechanical behavior under various sequential excavation methods. The results show a large settlement of the vault and upper stratum of the double-arch tunnel excavated in the fly ash accumulation stratum. In addition, the stratum can easily become unstable, so it is necessary to reinforce the stratum by grouting. Compared with the subsequent tunnel, the advance tunnel is more affected by excavation, and the risk of structural damage is higher. Compared with the central diaphragm (CD) method and the bench method, the single side drift method is more conducive to safe construction. A mid-partition wall can effectively reduce the settlement of the stratum, but it is easily deflected to the side by the bias pressure. Adding support on the side of the advance tunnel of the mid-partition wall is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
期刊最新文献
Development and application of air-assisted spraying device for dust suppression on tunnel boring machine Multi-scale investigation on tunnel face failure and soil arching in unsaturated sandy ground Study on the control effect of tunnel large deformation considering surrounding rock unloading expansion effect and support structure characteristics Relationship between the built environment and metro usage patterns: A motif-based perspective Experimental investigation of 15.5-m prototype segment lining structures: The load equivalent method and in-situ verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1