痛风的住院治疗:我们仍然失败。

Kate Alfeld,Murray L Barclay,Richard McNeill,Chris Frampton,Matt Doogue,Lisa K Stamp
{"title":"痛风的住院治疗:我们仍然失败。","authors":"Kate Alfeld,Murray L Barclay,Richard McNeill,Chris Frampton,Matt Doogue,Lisa K Stamp","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nDespite effective treatment, gout is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to determine rates of serum urate (SU) testing and allopurinol dose adjustment in patients on allopurinol admitted to Christchurch based hospitals.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe hospital electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system was used to identify patients on allopurinol during hospital admissions from March 2016-March 2023. Demographics, SU, renal function and changes to allopurinol therapy were recorded for each admission. Results were stratified by target SU and renal function.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 18,081 admissions taking allopurinol, SU was measured in 2,950 (16.32%). The mean SU was 0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L, with 1,270 (43.05%) above target SU (0.36 mmol/L). Admissions with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 were more likely to have SU above target than CKD1-2 (78.7% vs 21.3% (p<0.001). Of those with SU above target allopurinol was ceased in 148 (11.7%), dose reduced in 44 (3.5%), increased in 92 (7.2%), and unchanged in 986 (77.6%) during the admission. Those above target SU with CKD stage 3-5 were more likely to stop/decrease allopurinol dose compared to those with CKD stage 1-2 (16.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.01).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nMore than 80% of hospital admissions did not have SU measured despite the patient receiving allopurinol. Most admissions, acknowledging limitations, had suboptimal management of the allopurinol dose in the context of their SU. These results reflect a missed opportunity to review and optimise gout management.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient management of gout: we are still failing.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Alfeld,Murray L Barclay,Richard McNeill,Chris Frampton,Matt Doogue,Lisa K Stamp\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nDespite effective treatment, gout is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to determine rates of serum urate (SU) testing and allopurinol dose adjustment in patients on allopurinol admitted to Christchurch based hospitals.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe hospital electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system was used to identify patients on allopurinol during hospital admissions from March 2016-March 2023. Demographics, SU, renal function and changes to allopurinol therapy were recorded for each admission. Results were stratified by target SU and renal function.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 18,081 admissions taking allopurinol, SU was measured in 2,950 (16.32%). The mean SU was 0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L, with 1,270 (43.05%) above target SU (0.36 mmol/L). Admissions with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 were more likely to have SU above target than CKD1-2 (78.7% vs 21.3% (p<0.001). Of those with SU above target allopurinol was ceased in 148 (11.7%), dose reduced in 44 (3.5%), increased in 92 (7.2%), and unchanged in 986 (77.6%) during the admission. Those above target SU with CKD stage 3-5 were more likely to stop/decrease allopurinol dose compared to those with CKD stage 1-2 (16.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.01).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nMore than 80% of hospital admissions did not have SU measured despite the patient receiving allopurinol. Most admissions, acknowledging limitations, had suboptimal management of the allopurinol dose in the context of their SU. These results reflect a missed opportunity to review and optimise gout management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管治疗有效,但痛风的管理不善。本研究的目的是确定在基督城医院接受别嘌呤醇治疗的患者的血清尿酸(SU)检测率和别嘌呤醇剂量调整率。方法采用医院电子处方管理系统(ePA)对2016年3月至2023年3月住院期间使用别嘌呤醇的患者进行鉴定。记录每次入院患者的人口统计学、SU、肾功能和别嘌呤醇治疗的变化。结果按目标SU和肾功能分层。结果18081例服用别嘌呤醇的住院患者中,有2950例(16.32%)检测到SU。平均SU为0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L,高于目标SU (0.36 mmol/L) 1,270(43.05%)。入院的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD) 3-5期患者SU高于目标的可能性高于CKD1-2期患者(78.7% vs 21.3%) (p<0.001)。在SU高于目标的患者中,148人(11.7%)停止使用别嘌呤醇,44人(3.5%)减少剂量,92人(7.2%)增加剂量,986人(77.6%)在入院期间保持不变。高于目标SU的CKD 3-5期患者比CKD 1-2期患者更有可能停止/减少别嘌呤醇剂量(16.4% vs 10.4%;p = 0.01)。结论:超过80%的住院患者尽管接受了别嘌呤醇治疗,但仍未进行SU测量。大多数入院患者承认局限性,在他们的SU背景下,别嘌呤醇剂量管理不理想。这些结果反映了错过了审查和优化痛风管理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inpatient management of gout: we are still failing.
OBJECTIVE Despite effective treatment, gout is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to determine rates of serum urate (SU) testing and allopurinol dose adjustment in patients on allopurinol admitted to Christchurch based hospitals. METHODS The hospital electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system was used to identify patients on allopurinol during hospital admissions from March 2016-March 2023. Demographics, SU, renal function and changes to allopurinol therapy were recorded for each admission. Results were stratified by target SU and renal function. RESULTS Of 18,081 admissions taking allopurinol, SU was measured in 2,950 (16.32%). The mean SU was 0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L, with 1,270 (43.05%) above target SU (0.36 mmol/L). Admissions with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 were more likely to have SU above target than CKD1-2 (78.7% vs 21.3% (p<0.001). Of those with SU above target allopurinol was ceased in 148 (11.7%), dose reduced in 44 (3.5%), increased in 92 (7.2%), and unchanged in 986 (77.6%) during the admission. Those above target SU with CKD stage 3-5 were more likely to stop/decrease allopurinol dose compared to those with CKD stage 1-2 (16.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.01). CONCLUSION More than 80% of hospital admissions did not have SU measured despite the patient receiving allopurinol. Most admissions, acknowledging limitations, had suboptimal management of the allopurinol dose in the context of their SU. These results reflect a missed opportunity to review and optimise gout management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systemic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Presenting With Bilateral Renal Masses. Skin Eruption and Nerve Impairment: Eosinophil Activation Link. Clinical expression of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and its association with HLA-B27 in European and Ibero-American populations. Serum Biomarkers of Pulmonary Damage and Risk for Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Association between patient perception of disease status and different components of the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) criteria in psoriatic arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1