早产儿拔管失败的预测因素和结果:一项系统综述。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-068677
Lisiane Hoff Calegari,Medha Goyal,Sourabh Dutta,Amit Mukerji
{"title":"早产儿拔管失败的预测因素和结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Lisiane Hoff Calegari,Medha Goyal,Sourabh Dutta,Amit Mukerji","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nExtubation failure (EF) is common in preterm neonates and may be associated with adverse outcomes.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo systematically review and meta-analyze the existing literature on predictors and outcomes of EF in preterm neonates.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nMEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) from 1995 onward. The search strategy was developed by a reference librarian.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nExperimental or observational studies reporting on predictors and/or outcomes related to EF (defined as reintubation within 7 days) in preterm neonates less than 37 weeks were eligible. Predictors included machine learning (ML) algorithms and lung ultrasound (LUS). Main outcome of interest was association of EF with mortality and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nStudies identified by the search strategy were screened based on title and abstract. Data from included studies were extracted independently by 2 authors, along with adjudication of risk of bias. RevMan Web was used to conduct meta-analyses.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOut of 8336 studies screened, 120 were included. Neonates with lower gestational age at birth, birthweight, postmenstrual age, and weight at extubation were more likely to experience EF. Higher level of pre-extubation respiratory support, indicated by lower pre-extubation pH and higher pre-extubation mean airway pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, and Pco2 were associated with EF risk. ML models showed variable accuracy and lower external validity. LUS may be a promising predictor, though scoring systems varied. EF was associated with higher odds of mortality and/or BPD (pooled odds ratio [OR], 4.7; 95% CI, 2.84-7.76) as well as the individual components of the composite: mortality (pooled OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 2.35-6.36) and BPD (pooled OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.54-4.21).\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nAssociations were derived from unadjusted data, precluding a definitive causal relationship between EF and predictors/outcomes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nLower gestational and chronological age and higher levels of pre-extubation ventilation support were associated with EF. ML models and LUS scores require further validation in larger studies. EF was associated with mortality and/or BPD.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors and Outcomes of Extubation Failure in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Lisiane Hoff Calegari,Medha Goyal,Sourabh Dutta,Amit Mukerji\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-068677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\r\\nExtubation failure (EF) is common in preterm neonates and may be associated with adverse outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo systematically review and meta-analyze the existing literature on predictors and outcomes of EF in preterm neonates.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA SOURCES\\r\\nMEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) from 1995 onward. The search strategy was developed by a reference librarian.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY SELECTION\\r\\nExperimental or observational studies reporting on predictors and/or outcomes related to EF (defined as reintubation within 7 days) in preterm neonates less than 37 weeks were eligible. Predictors included machine learning (ML) algorithms and lung ultrasound (LUS). Main outcome of interest was association of EF with mortality and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA EXTRACTION\\r\\nStudies identified by the search strategy were screened based on title and abstract. Data from included studies were extracted independently by 2 authors, along with adjudication of risk of bias. RevMan Web was used to conduct meta-analyses.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOut of 8336 studies screened, 120 were included. Neonates with lower gestational age at birth, birthweight, postmenstrual age, and weight at extubation were more likely to experience EF. Higher level of pre-extubation respiratory support, indicated by lower pre-extubation pH and higher pre-extubation mean airway pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, and Pco2 were associated with EF risk. ML models showed variable accuracy and lower external validity. LUS may be a promising predictor, though scoring systems varied. EF was associated with higher odds of mortality and/or BPD (pooled odds ratio [OR], 4.7; 95% CI, 2.84-7.76) as well as the individual components of the composite: mortality (pooled OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 2.35-6.36) and BPD (pooled OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.54-4.21).\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS\\r\\nAssociations were derived from unadjusted data, precluding a definitive causal relationship between EF and predictors/outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nLower gestational and chronological age and higher levels of pre-extubation ventilation support were associated with EF. ML models and LUS scores require further validation in larger studies. EF was associated with mortality and/or BPD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:插管失败(EF)在早产儿中很常见,并可能与不良后果相关。目的系统回顾和荟萃分析早产儿EF的预测因素和预后。数据来源medline, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed citation, Embase (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), Cochrane Library (Wiley)自1995年起。这个搜索策略是由一位参考图书管理员制定的。研究选择:报告少于37周的早产儿EF(定义为7天内再插管)相关预测因素和/或结果的实验或观察性研究符合条件。预测指标包括机器学习(ML)算法和肺超声(LUS)。主要结局是EF与死亡率和/或支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的关系。数据提取通过检索策略识别的研究根据标题和摘要进行筛选。纳入研究的数据由两位作者独立提取,并对偏倚风险进行了判定。采用RevMan Web进行meta分析。结果在筛选的8336项研究中,纳入120项。出生时胎龄、出生体重、经后年龄和拔管时体重较低的新生儿更容易发生EF。较高水平的拔管前呼吸支持,即较低的拔管前pH值和较高的拔管前平均气道压力、吸入氧气分数和二氧化碳分压与EF风险相关。ML模型的准确性不稳定,外部效度较低。LUS可能是一个很有希望的预测指标,尽管评分系统各不相同。EF与较高的死亡率和/或BPD相关(合并优势比[or], 4.7;95% CI, 2.84-7.76)以及组合的单个组成部分:死亡率(合并OR, 3.87;95% CI, 2.35-6.36)和BPD(合并OR, 3.27;95% ci, 2.54-4.21)。局限性:关联来源于未经调整的数据,排除了EF和预测因子/结果之间明确的因果关系。结论较低的胎龄和实足年龄以及较高的拔管前通气支持水平与EF相关。ML模型和LUS评分需要在更大规模的研究中进一步验证。EF与死亡率和/或BPD相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors and Outcomes of Extubation Failure in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review.
CONTEXT Extubation failure (EF) is common in preterm neonates and may be associated with adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and meta-analyze the existing literature on predictors and outcomes of EF in preterm neonates. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) from 1995 onward. The search strategy was developed by a reference librarian. STUDY SELECTION Experimental or observational studies reporting on predictors and/or outcomes related to EF (defined as reintubation within 7 days) in preterm neonates less than 37 weeks were eligible. Predictors included machine learning (ML) algorithms and lung ultrasound (LUS). Main outcome of interest was association of EF with mortality and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). DATA EXTRACTION Studies identified by the search strategy were screened based on title and abstract. Data from included studies were extracted independently by 2 authors, along with adjudication of risk of bias. RevMan Web was used to conduct meta-analyses. RESULTS Out of 8336 studies screened, 120 were included. Neonates with lower gestational age at birth, birthweight, postmenstrual age, and weight at extubation were more likely to experience EF. Higher level of pre-extubation respiratory support, indicated by lower pre-extubation pH and higher pre-extubation mean airway pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, and Pco2 were associated with EF risk. ML models showed variable accuracy and lower external validity. LUS may be a promising predictor, though scoring systems varied. EF was associated with higher odds of mortality and/or BPD (pooled odds ratio [OR], 4.7; 95% CI, 2.84-7.76) as well as the individual components of the composite: mortality (pooled OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 2.35-6.36) and BPD (pooled OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.54-4.21). LIMITATIONS Associations were derived from unadjusted data, precluding a definitive causal relationship between EF and predictors/outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Lower gestational and chronological age and higher levels of pre-extubation ventilation support were associated with EF. ML models and LUS scores require further validation in larger studies. EF was associated with mortality and/or BPD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Prescription Patterns: Paying Attention to Trends. Prescription Stimulant Dispensing to US Children: 2017-2023. Academic Achievement of Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. October 2024 ACIP Meeting Update: Influenza, COVID-19, RSV and Other Vaccines. Late-Onset Sepsis Among Extremely Preterm Infants During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1