Kaiyi Huang;Chengqi Duan;Kaiyue Sun;Enze Xie;Zhenguo Li;Xihui Liu
{"title":"twi - compbench ++:一个用于合成文本到图像生成的增强和全面的基准","authors":"Kaiyi Huang;Chengqi Duan;Kaiyue Sun;Enze Xie;Zhenguo Li;Xihui Liu","doi":"10.1109/TPAMI.2025.3531907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the impressive advances in text-to-image models, they often struggle to effectively compose complex scenes with multiple objects, displaying various attributes and relationships. To address this challenge, we present T2I-CompBench++, an enhanced benchmark for compositional text-to-image generation. T2I-CompBench++ comprises 8,000 compositional text prompts categorized into four primary groups: attribute binding, object relationships, generative numeracy, and complex compositions. These are further divided into eight sub-categories, including newly introduced ones like 3D-spatial relationships and numeracy. In addition to the benchmark, we propose enhanced evaluation metrics designed to assess these diverse compositional challenges. These include a detection-based metric tailored for evaluating 3D-spatial relationships and numeracy, and an analysis leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), <i>i.e</i>. GPT-4 V, ShareGPT4v as evaluation metrics. Our experiments benchmark 11 text-to-image models, including state-of-the-art models, such as FLUX.1, SD3, DALLE-3, Pixart-<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\alpha$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and SD-XL on T2I-CompBench++. We also conduct comprehensive evaluations to validate the effectiveness of our metrics and explore the potential and limitations of MLLMs.","PeriodicalId":94034,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence","volume":"47 5","pages":"3563-3579"},"PeriodicalIF":18.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10847875","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation\",\"authors\":\"Kaiyi Huang;Chengqi Duan;Kaiyue Sun;Enze Xie;Zhenguo Li;Xihui Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPAMI.2025.3531907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the impressive advances in text-to-image models, they often struggle to effectively compose complex scenes with multiple objects, displaying various attributes and relationships. To address this challenge, we present T2I-CompBench++, an enhanced benchmark for compositional text-to-image generation. T2I-CompBench++ comprises 8,000 compositional text prompts categorized into four primary groups: attribute binding, object relationships, generative numeracy, and complex compositions. These are further divided into eight sub-categories, including newly introduced ones like 3D-spatial relationships and numeracy. In addition to the benchmark, we propose enhanced evaluation metrics designed to assess these diverse compositional challenges. These include a detection-based metric tailored for evaluating 3D-spatial relationships and numeracy, and an analysis leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), <i>i.e</i>. GPT-4 V, ShareGPT4v as evaluation metrics. Our experiments benchmark 11 text-to-image models, including state-of-the-art models, such as FLUX.1, SD3, DALLE-3, Pixart-<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\\\alpha$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and SD-XL on T2I-CompBench++. We also conduct comprehensive evaluations to validate the effectiveness of our metrics and explore the potential and limitations of MLLMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"3563-3579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10847875\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10847875/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10847875/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation
Despite the impressive advances in text-to-image models, they often struggle to effectively compose complex scenes with multiple objects, displaying various attributes and relationships. To address this challenge, we present T2I-CompBench++, an enhanced benchmark for compositional text-to-image generation. T2I-CompBench++ comprises 8,000 compositional text prompts categorized into four primary groups: attribute binding, object relationships, generative numeracy, and complex compositions. These are further divided into eight sub-categories, including newly introduced ones like 3D-spatial relationships and numeracy. In addition to the benchmark, we propose enhanced evaluation metrics designed to assess these diverse compositional challenges. These include a detection-based metric tailored for evaluating 3D-spatial relationships and numeracy, and an analysis leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), i.e. GPT-4 V, ShareGPT4v as evaluation metrics. Our experiments benchmark 11 text-to-image models, including state-of-the-art models, such as FLUX.1, SD3, DALLE-3, Pixart-$\alpha$, and SD-XL on T2I-CompBench++. We also conduct comprehensive evaluations to validate the effectiveness of our metrics and explore the potential and limitations of MLLMs.