dolutegravir +拉米夫定对未接受治疗且无基线耐药试验(D2ARLING)的HIV感染者的疗效:一项为期48周的4期随机、开放标签、非效性试验结果。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Lancet Hiv Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/s2352-3018(24)00294-7
Ezequiel Cordova,Jeniffer Hernandez Rendon,Veronica Mingrone,Patricio Martin,Gisela Arevalo Calderon,Soledad Seleme,Jamile Ballivian,Norma Porteiro
{"title":"dolutegravir +拉米夫定对未接受治疗且无基线耐药试验(D2ARLING)的HIV感染者的疗效:一项为期48周的4期随机、开放标签、非效性试验结果。","authors":"Ezequiel Cordova,Jeniffer Hernandez Rendon,Veronica Mingrone,Patricio Martin,Gisela Arevalo Calderon,Soledad Seleme,Jamile Ballivian,Norma Porteiro","doi":"10.1016/s2352-3018(24)00294-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDolutegravir plus lamivudine has emerged as a preferred treatment for HIV; however, initiating this regimen without baseline resistance testing raises concerns about the potential presence of pretreatment lamivudine resistance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in the absence of information on baseline resistance testing in treatment-naive people with HIV.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe did an open-label, non-inferiority, single-centre, phase 4, randomised controlled study (D2ARLING), designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people with HIV with no available baseline resistance testing. We included participants aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 diagnosis who were naive to antiretroviral therapy and had no baseline genotypic resistance testing result available. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to receive dolutegravir 50 mg plus lamivudine 300 mg or a three-drug regimen including dolutegravir 50 mg plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and either emtricitabine 200 mg or lamivudine 300 mg. Randomisation was stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (≤100 000 vs >100 000 copies per mL) and CD4 cell count (<200 vs ≥200 cells per μL). Per protocol, we performed genotypic drug-resistance testing on day 1 and it remained double-masked throughout the study, simulating a scenario of inaccessibility of baseline resistance testing. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (intention-to-treat exposed analysis via the Snapshot algorithm) with prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04549467).\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nBetween Nov 17, 2020, and Aug 31, 2022, 214 participants were randomly assigned to and treated with dolutegravir plus lamivudine (n=106) or dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and either emtricitabine or lamivudine (n=108). Median age of participants was 31 years (IQR 26-39) and 49 (23%) were female. At baseline, 66 (31%) of participants had an HIV-1 RNA viral load of more than 100 000 copies per mL, and 44 (21%) had a CD4 T-cell count of less than 200 cells per μL. At week 48, 97 (92%) of 106 participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and 96 (89%) of 108 participants in the dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with either emtricitabine or lamivudine group had HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL (difference 2·62%; 95% CI -5·3 to 10·6), showing non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine to the three-drug regimen. None of the participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and two in the control group had protocol-defined virological failure, and none developed treatment-emergent resistance mutations to any of the study drugs. Overall adverse event rates were similar between arms. Less than 1% of participants in both groups were discontinued due to adverse events.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nThis study provides evidence supporting the non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine compared with a preferred three-drug regimen in treatment-naive individuals without baseline resistance testing. These findings suggest that baseline resistance testing might not be a requirement for initiating treatment with dolutegravir plus lamivudine in settings with low frequency or suspicion of transmitted drug resistance to these drugs.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nViiV Healthcare.","PeriodicalId":48725,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Hiv","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people living with HIV without baseline drug-resistance testing available (D2ARLING): 48-week results of a phase 4, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ezequiel Cordova,Jeniffer Hernandez Rendon,Veronica Mingrone,Patricio Martin,Gisela Arevalo Calderon,Soledad Seleme,Jamile Ballivian,Norma Porteiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2352-3018(24)00294-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nDolutegravir plus lamivudine has emerged as a preferred treatment for HIV; however, initiating this regimen without baseline resistance testing raises concerns about the potential presence of pretreatment lamivudine resistance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in the absence of information on baseline resistance testing in treatment-naive people with HIV.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe did an open-label, non-inferiority, single-centre, phase 4, randomised controlled study (D2ARLING), designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people with HIV with no available baseline resistance testing. We included participants aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 diagnosis who were naive to antiretroviral therapy and had no baseline genotypic resistance testing result available. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to receive dolutegravir 50 mg plus lamivudine 300 mg or a three-drug regimen including dolutegravir 50 mg plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and either emtricitabine 200 mg or lamivudine 300 mg. Randomisation was stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (≤100 000 vs >100 000 copies per mL) and CD4 cell count (<200 vs ≥200 cells per μL). Per protocol, we performed genotypic drug-resistance testing on day 1 and it remained double-masked throughout the study, simulating a scenario of inaccessibility of baseline resistance testing. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (intention-to-treat exposed analysis via the Snapshot algorithm) with prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04549467).\\r\\n\\r\\nFINDINGS\\r\\nBetween Nov 17, 2020, and Aug 31, 2022, 214 participants were randomly assigned to and treated with dolutegravir plus lamivudine (n=106) or dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and either emtricitabine or lamivudine (n=108). Median age of participants was 31 years (IQR 26-39) and 49 (23%) were female. At baseline, 66 (31%) of participants had an HIV-1 RNA viral load of more than 100 000 copies per mL, and 44 (21%) had a CD4 T-cell count of less than 200 cells per μL. At week 48, 97 (92%) of 106 participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and 96 (89%) of 108 participants in the dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with either emtricitabine or lamivudine group had HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL (difference 2·62%; 95% CI -5·3 to 10·6), showing non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine to the three-drug regimen. None of the participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and two in the control group had protocol-defined virological failure, and none developed treatment-emergent resistance mutations to any of the study drugs. Overall adverse event rates were similar between arms. Less than 1% of participants in both groups were discontinued due to adverse events.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nThis study provides evidence supporting the non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine compared with a preferred three-drug regimen in treatment-naive individuals without baseline resistance testing. These findings suggest that baseline resistance testing might not be a requirement for initiating treatment with dolutegravir plus lamivudine in settings with low frequency or suspicion of transmitted drug resistance to these drugs.\\r\\n\\r\\nFUNDING\\r\\nViiV Healthcare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3018(24)00294-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3018(24)00294-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

dolutegravir +拉米夫定已经成为HIV的首选治疗方案;然而,在没有基线耐药试验的情况下启动该方案引起了对潜在的预处理拉米夫定耐药的担忧。我们的目的是在缺乏基线耐药检测信息的情况下,评估多替格拉韦加拉米夫定在未接受治疗的HIV感染者中的疗效。方法:我们进行了一项开放标签、非效性、单中心、4期随机对照研究(D2ARLING),旨在评估多替格拉韦联合拉米夫定在未接受治疗且无基线耐药检测的HIV感染者中的疗效和安全性。我们纳入了年龄在18岁或以上的HIV-1诊断患者,他们未接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,并且没有基线基因型耐药测试结果。我们随机分配(1:1)参与者接受多替重力韦50 mg +拉米夫定300 mg或三药方案,包括多替重力韦50 mg +富马酸替诺福韦二吡酯300 mg和恩曲他滨200 mg或拉米夫定300 mg。随机化通过基线HIV-1 RNA(≤100000 vs bb0 100000拷贝/ mL)和CD4细胞计数(<200 vs≥200细胞/ μL)分层。根据方案,我们在第1天进行基因型耐药测试,并在整个研究过程中保持双掩码,模拟无法获得基线耐药测试的情况。主要终点是48周时血浆HIV-1 RNA低于50拷贝/ mL的参与者比例(通过Snapshot算法进行意向治疗暴露分析),预设的非劣效边际为10%。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04549467)。结果:在2020年11月17日至2022年8月31日期间,214名参与者被随机分配到多替重力韦加拉米夫定(n=106)或多替重力韦加富马酸替诺福韦二吡酯和恩曲他滨或拉米夫定(n=108)治疗。参与者的中位年龄为31岁(IQR 26-39), 49岁(23%)为女性。在基线时,66名(31%)参与者的HIV-1 RNA病毒载量超过100,000拷贝/ mL, 44名(21%)参与者的CD4 t细胞计数低于200个/ μL。在第48周,多替重力韦加拉米夫定组106名参与者中有97名(92%)和多替重力韦加富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯与恩曲他滨或拉米夫定组108名参与者中有96名(89%)的HIV-1 RNA小于50拷贝/ mL(差异为2.62%;95% CI为- 5.3 ~ 10.6),显示多替格拉韦联合拉米夫定对三药方案的非劣效性。dolutegravir +拉米夫定组的参与者和对照组的两名参与者没有出现协议定义的病毒学失败,也没有出现对任何研究药物的治疗产生的耐药突变。两组间总的不良事件发生率相似。两组中均有不到1%的受试者因不良事件而停药。解释:本研究提供了证据,支持在没有基线耐药测试的初始治疗个体中,与首选的三药方案相比,多替格拉韦加拉米夫定的非劣效性。这些发现表明,在低频率或怀疑对这些药物传播性耐药的环境中,基线耐药检测可能不是开始使用多替格拉韦加拉米夫定治疗的必要条件。FUNDINGViiV医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people living with HIV without baseline drug-resistance testing available (D2ARLING): 48-week results of a phase 4, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
BACKGROUND Dolutegravir plus lamivudine has emerged as a preferred treatment for HIV; however, initiating this regimen without baseline resistance testing raises concerns about the potential presence of pretreatment lamivudine resistance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in the absence of information on baseline resistance testing in treatment-naive people with HIV. METHODS We did an open-label, non-inferiority, single-centre, phase 4, randomised controlled study (D2ARLING), designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people with HIV with no available baseline resistance testing. We included participants aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 diagnosis who were naive to antiretroviral therapy and had no baseline genotypic resistance testing result available. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to receive dolutegravir 50 mg plus lamivudine 300 mg or a three-drug regimen including dolutegravir 50 mg plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and either emtricitabine 200 mg or lamivudine 300 mg. Randomisation was stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (≤100 000 vs >100 000 copies per mL) and CD4 cell count (<200 vs ≥200 cells per μL). Per protocol, we performed genotypic drug-resistance testing on day 1 and it remained double-masked throughout the study, simulating a scenario of inaccessibility of baseline resistance testing. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (intention-to-treat exposed analysis via the Snapshot algorithm) with prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04549467). FINDINGS Between Nov 17, 2020, and Aug 31, 2022, 214 participants were randomly assigned to and treated with dolutegravir plus lamivudine (n=106) or dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and either emtricitabine or lamivudine (n=108). Median age of participants was 31 years (IQR 26-39) and 49 (23%) were female. At baseline, 66 (31%) of participants had an HIV-1 RNA viral load of more than 100 000 copies per mL, and 44 (21%) had a CD4 T-cell count of less than 200 cells per μL. At week 48, 97 (92%) of 106 participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and 96 (89%) of 108 participants in the dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with either emtricitabine or lamivudine group had HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL (difference 2·62%; 95% CI -5·3 to 10·6), showing non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine to the three-drug regimen. None of the participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and two in the control group had protocol-defined virological failure, and none developed treatment-emergent resistance mutations to any of the study drugs. Overall adverse event rates were similar between arms. Less than 1% of participants in both groups were discontinued due to adverse events. INTERPRETATION This study provides evidence supporting the non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine compared with a preferred three-drug regimen in treatment-naive individuals without baseline resistance testing. These findings suggest that baseline resistance testing might not be a requirement for initiating treatment with dolutegravir plus lamivudine in settings with low frequency or suspicion of transmitted drug resistance to these drugs. FUNDING ViiV Healthcare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Hiv
Lancet Hiv IMMUNOLOGYINFECTIOUS DISEASES&-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: The Lancet HIV is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge with an Impact Factor of 16.1. It is dedicated to publishing original research, evidence-based reviews, and insightful features that advocate for change in or illuminates HIV clinical practice. The journal aims to provide a holistic view of the pandemic, covering clinical, epidemiological, and operational disciplines. It publishes content on innovative treatments and the biological research behind them, novel methods of service delivery, and new approaches to confronting HIV/AIDS worldwide. The Lancet HIV publishes various types of content including articles, reviews, comments, correspondences, and viewpoints. It also publishes series that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in HIV. The journal is indexed by several abstracting and indexing services, including Crossref, Embase, Essential Science Indicators, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCIE and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
Performance of the pooled cohort equations and D:A:D risk scores among individuals with HIV in a global cardiovascular disease prevention trial: a cohort study leveraging data from REPRIEVE. Risk estimation in HIV reveals our usual blind spots. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine treatment without HIV drug-resistance tests. Efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people living with HIV without baseline drug-resistance testing available (D2ARLING): 48-week results of a phase 4, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Event-driven PrEP beyond cisgender men who have sex with men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1