芬兰一项基于人群的队列研究:抗精神病治疗策略预防首发精神分裂症复发的比较有效性

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Lancet Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00366-3
Heidi Taipale, Antti Tanskanen, Oliver Howes, Christoph U Correll, John M Kane, Jari Tiihonen
{"title":"芬兰一项基于人群的队列研究:抗精神病治疗策略预防首发精神分裂症复发的比较有效性","authors":"Heidi Taipale, Antti Tanskanen, Oliver Howes, Christoph U Correll, John M Kane, Jari Tiihonen","doi":"10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00366-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The best pharmacological treatment practices for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia are unclear. We aimed to assess different treatment strategies used before and after the first relapse, and their associations with subsequent relapse risk.<h3>Methods</h3>In this population-based cohort study, we enrolled individuals (aged ≤45 years) with first-episode schizophrenia who were hospitalised and subsequently relapsed between 1996 and 2014 from the nationwide Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Individuals who had not been taking antipsychotics within the year preceeding initial hospitalisation and who had a relapse within 5 years of discharge were included in the analyses. Treatment strategies were assessed during the 30 days before hospitalisation for the first relapse and 30 days after discharge and were categorised as either long-acting injectable, clozapine, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic polypharmacy, and antipsychotic non-use. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of the risk of second relapse based on treatment type were analysed with Cox regression models for 2 years after the first relapse, or until death or end of data linkage (Dec 31, 2017). People with lived experience of schizophrenia were not involved in the research and writing process.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Jan 31, 1996 and Dec 31, 2017, 3000 individuals had their first psychosis relapse and were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 30·0 years (SD 7·6), 1069 (35·6%) of patients were women and 1931 (64·4%) men. No ethnicity data were available. 2148 (71·7%) had a second relapse within 2 years. Before first relapse, most individuals were either not using antipsychotics (n=1366 [45·5%]), or were using non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (n=973 [32·4%]). Compared with continuing the same treatment strategy used before the first relapse, switching to clozapine was associated with the lowest risk of second relapse compared with continuing any non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (aHR 0·66, 95% CI 0·49–0·89; relapse rate 73·2% with oral non-clozapine antipsychotic monotherapy continuation <em>vs</em> 57·1% with switch to clozapine). Switching to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (0·99, 0·76–1·28) was approximately as unhelpful in preventing the next relapse as switching to antipsychotic non-use (1·07, 0·80–1·42).<h3>Interpretation</h3>In patients with first-episode schizophrenia having their first psychosis relapse despite use of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, continuation with the same antipsychotic modality or switch to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic did not show evidence of being beneficial in relapse prevention, suggesting that clozapine should be started instead. This finding, together with existing knowledge of decreased risk of mortality associated with clozapine, challenges current treatment guidelines that recommend clozapine as a third-line treatment, resulting in treatment practices characterised by long delays to clozapine initiation.<h3>Funding</h3>Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment strategies for relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a population-based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Taipale, Antti Tanskanen, Oliver Howes, Christoph U Correll, John M Kane, Jari Tiihonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00366-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>The best pharmacological treatment practices for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia are unclear. We aimed to assess different treatment strategies used before and after the first relapse, and their associations with subsequent relapse risk.<h3>Methods</h3>In this population-based cohort study, we enrolled individuals (aged ≤45 years) with first-episode schizophrenia who were hospitalised and subsequently relapsed between 1996 and 2014 from the nationwide Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Individuals who had not been taking antipsychotics within the year preceeding initial hospitalisation and who had a relapse within 5 years of discharge were included in the analyses. Treatment strategies were assessed during the 30 days before hospitalisation for the first relapse and 30 days after discharge and were categorised as either long-acting injectable, clozapine, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic polypharmacy, and antipsychotic non-use. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of the risk of second relapse based on treatment type were analysed with Cox regression models for 2 years after the first relapse, or until death or end of data linkage (Dec 31, 2017). People with lived experience of schizophrenia were not involved in the research and writing process.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Jan 31, 1996 and Dec 31, 2017, 3000 individuals had their first psychosis relapse and were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 30·0 years (SD 7·6), 1069 (35·6%) of patients were women and 1931 (64·4%) men. No ethnicity data were available. 2148 (71·7%) had a second relapse within 2 years. Before first relapse, most individuals were either not using antipsychotics (n=1366 [45·5%]), or were using non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (n=973 [32·4%]). Compared with continuing the same treatment strategy used before the first relapse, switching to clozapine was associated with the lowest risk of second relapse compared with continuing any non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (aHR 0·66, 95% CI 0·49–0·89; relapse rate 73·2% with oral non-clozapine antipsychotic monotherapy continuation <em>vs</em> 57·1% with switch to clozapine). Switching to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (0·99, 0·76–1·28) was approximately as unhelpful in preventing the next relapse as switching to antipsychotic non-use (1·07, 0·80–1·42).<h3>Interpretation</h3>In patients with first-episode schizophrenia having their first psychosis relapse despite use of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, continuation with the same antipsychotic modality or switch to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic did not show evidence of being beneficial in relapse prevention, suggesting that clozapine should be started instead. This finding, together with existing knowledge of decreased risk of mortality associated with clozapine, challenges current treatment guidelines that recommend clozapine as a third-line treatment, resulting in treatment practices characterised by long delays to clozapine initiation.<h3>Funding</h3>Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00366-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00366-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预防首发精神分裂症患者复发的最佳药物治疗方法尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估第一次复发前后使用的不同治疗策略,以及它们与随后复发风险的关系。方法在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们从芬兰全国医院出院登记簿中招募了1996年至2014年间住院并随后复发的首发精神分裂症患者(年龄≤45岁)。在初次住院前一年内未服用抗精神病药物和出院后5年内复发的个体被纳入分析。在首次复发住院前30天和出院后30天评估治疗策略,并将其分为长效注射、氯氮平、非氯氮平口服抗精神病单药治疗、非氯氮平口服抗精神病综合药物治疗和不使用抗精神病药物治疗。在首次复发后2年,或直到死亡或数据链接结束(2017年12月31日),使用Cox回归模型分析基于治疗类型的第二次复发风险的调整风险比(aHRs)。有精神分裂症生活经历的人没有参与研究和写作过程。在1996年1月31日至2017年12月31日期间,有3000人首次精神病复发,并有资格进行分析。平均年龄30.0岁(SD为7.6),女性1069例(35.6%),男性1931例(64%)。没有种族数据。2年内第二次复发2148例(71.7%)。首次复发前,大多数患者要么未使用抗精神病药物(n=1366[45.5%]),要么正在使用非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单一疗法(n=973[32.4%])。与第一次复发前继续使用相同的治疗策略相比,与继续任何非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单一治疗相比,改用氯氮平与第二次复发的风险最低(aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49 - 0.89;继续口服非氯氮平抗精神病药物单药治疗的复发率为73.2%,而改用氯氮平治疗的复发率为57.1%。切换到另一种非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单一疗法(0.99,0.76 - 0.28)与切换到不使用抗精神病药物(1.07,0.80 - 1.42)在预防下一次复发方面几乎没有帮助。在首次精神病复发的首发精神分裂症患者中,尽管使用了非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物,但继续使用相同的抗精神病药物或改用另一种非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物,并没有显示出对预防复发有益的证据,这表明应该开始使用氯氮平。这一发现与氯氮平降低死亡率相关的现有知识一起,挑战了目前推荐氯氮平作为三线治疗的治疗指南,导致治疗实践的特点是氯氮平起始治疗的长时间延迟。资助西格丽德·尤萨柳斯基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment strategies for relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a population-based cohort study

Background

The best pharmacological treatment practices for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia are unclear. We aimed to assess different treatment strategies used before and after the first relapse, and their associations with subsequent relapse risk.

Methods

In this population-based cohort study, we enrolled individuals (aged ≤45 years) with first-episode schizophrenia who were hospitalised and subsequently relapsed between 1996 and 2014 from the nationwide Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Individuals who had not been taking antipsychotics within the year preceeding initial hospitalisation and who had a relapse within 5 years of discharge were included in the analyses. Treatment strategies were assessed during the 30 days before hospitalisation for the first relapse and 30 days after discharge and were categorised as either long-acting injectable, clozapine, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic polypharmacy, and antipsychotic non-use. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of the risk of second relapse based on treatment type were analysed with Cox regression models for 2 years after the first relapse, or until death or end of data linkage (Dec 31, 2017). People with lived experience of schizophrenia were not involved in the research and writing process.

Findings

Between Jan 31, 1996 and Dec 31, 2017, 3000 individuals had their first psychosis relapse and were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 30·0 years (SD 7·6), 1069 (35·6%) of patients were women and 1931 (64·4%) men. No ethnicity data were available. 2148 (71·7%) had a second relapse within 2 years. Before first relapse, most individuals were either not using antipsychotics (n=1366 [45·5%]), or were using non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (n=973 [32·4%]). Compared with continuing the same treatment strategy used before the first relapse, switching to clozapine was associated with the lowest risk of second relapse compared with continuing any non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (aHR 0·66, 95% CI 0·49–0·89; relapse rate 73·2% with oral non-clozapine antipsychotic monotherapy continuation vs 57·1% with switch to clozapine). Switching to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (0·99, 0·76–1·28) was approximately as unhelpful in preventing the next relapse as switching to antipsychotic non-use (1·07, 0·80–1·42).

Interpretation

In patients with first-episode schizophrenia having their first psychosis relapse despite use of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, continuation with the same antipsychotic modality or switch to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic did not show evidence of being beneficial in relapse prevention, suggesting that clozapine should be started instead. This finding, together with existing knowledge of decreased risk of mortality associated with clozapine, challenges current treatment guidelines that recommend clozapine as a third-line treatment, resulting in treatment practices characterised by long delays to clozapine initiation.

Funding

Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and effectiveness of therapist-guided internet versus face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression via counterfactual inference using naturalistic registers and machine learning in Finland: a retrospective cohort study From clinical trials to real-world effectiveness: evaluating guided iCBT for depression in routine care Towards collective healing: peacebuilding and mental health in Syria Drug development in psychiatry: 50 years of failure and how to resuscitate it Quality improvement for suicide prevention and self-harm intervention: addressing the implementation gap and saving lives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1