新石器时代晚期喀尔巴阡盆地使用Mecsek孔雀石的神话——外多瑙河东南部新石器时代晚期孔雀石和铜制品的来源

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s12520-024-02149-4
Zsuzsanna Siklósi, Anett Osztás, Bernadett Bajnóczi, Igor M. Villa, Stefano Nisi, Viktória Mozgai, Zsuzsanna M. Virág
{"title":"新石器时代晚期喀尔巴阡盆地使用Mecsek孔雀石的神话——外多瑙河东南部新石器时代晚期孔雀石和铜制品的来源","authors":"Zsuzsanna Siklósi,&nbsp;Anett Osztás,&nbsp;Bernadett Bajnóczi,&nbsp;Igor M. Villa,&nbsp;Stefano Nisi,&nbsp;Viktória Mozgai,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna M. Virág","doi":"10.1007/s12520-024-02149-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the second half of the Late Neolithic (4700 − 4500 cal BCE), the first malachite and copper artefacts appeared in large quantities in the territory of present-day Hungary. They are known only as grave goods such as beads, rings and bracelets. Copper artefacts are concentrated in South-eastern Transdanubia, and archaeological literature has argued that this copper wealth may have been due to the exploitation of local malachite resources in the Mecsek Mountains. In our study, we compared lead isotope and chemical composition measurements of Mecsek malachite sources, Late Neolithic malachite and copper artefacts, and other potential ore sources to investigate the provenance of the raw material of these artefacts. The results of our analysis clearly exclude the exploitation of local, Mecsek sources. The malachite and copper artefacts found in the same grave may have come from the same source in the majority of the cases. This suggests that a set of ornaments was made using either technology. Among the potential sources, several mining regions emerged, primarily in the territory of present-day Bulgaria. A group of copper artefacts with high purity, common in contemporaneous Balkan sites, may come from a single source, which remains unknown. A smaller group of artefacts might be derived from the Bihor region. These results can be interpreted as a long-distance prestige exchange network, in which a composite set of ornaments were circulated in long distances and the source areas of the raw materials and the sites where they were finally deposited were not certainly directly linked.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The myth of Mecsek malachite used in the Late Neolithic Carpathian Basin– the provenance of Late Neolithic malachite and copper artefacts from South-eastern Transdanubia\",\"authors\":\"Zsuzsanna Siklósi,&nbsp;Anett Osztás,&nbsp;Bernadett Bajnóczi,&nbsp;Igor M. Villa,&nbsp;Stefano Nisi,&nbsp;Viktória Mozgai,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna M. Virág\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-024-02149-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the second half of the Late Neolithic (4700 − 4500 cal BCE), the first malachite and copper artefacts appeared in large quantities in the territory of present-day Hungary. They are known only as grave goods such as beads, rings and bracelets. Copper artefacts are concentrated in South-eastern Transdanubia, and archaeological literature has argued that this copper wealth may have been due to the exploitation of local malachite resources in the Mecsek Mountains. In our study, we compared lead isotope and chemical composition measurements of Mecsek malachite sources, Late Neolithic malachite and copper artefacts, and other potential ore sources to investigate the provenance of the raw material of these artefacts. The results of our analysis clearly exclude the exploitation of local, Mecsek sources. The malachite and copper artefacts found in the same grave may have come from the same source in the majority of the cases. This suggests that a set of ornaments was made using either technology. Among the potential sources, several mining regions emerged, primarily in the territory of present-day Bulgaria. A group of copper artefacts with high purity, common in contemporaneous Balkan sites, may come from a single source, which remains unknown. A smaller group of artefacts might be derived from the Bihor region. These results can be interpreted as a long-distance prestige exchange network, in which a composite set of ornaments were circulated in long distances and the source areas of the raw materials and the sites where they were finally deposited were not certainly directly linked.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02149-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02149-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新石器时代晚期(公元前4700 - 4500年)的下半叶,孔雀石和铜制品在今天的匈牙利境内大量出现。人们只知道它们是珠子、戒指和手镯等陪葬品。铜制品集中在外多瑙河东南部,考古文献认为,这种铜财富可能是由于在Mecsek山脉开采当地孔雀石资源。在我们的研究中,我们比较了Mecsek孔雀石来源、新石器时代晚期孔雀石和铜人工制品以及其他潜在矿石来源的铅同位素和化学成分测量,以研究这些人工制品原材料的来源。我们的分析结果明确排除了对当地梅塞克资源的开采。在大多数情况下,在同一座坟墓中发现的孔雀石和铜文物可能来自同一来源。这表明一套装饰品是使用其中一种技术制作的。在潜在的资源中,出现了几个矿区,主要是在今天的保加利亚境内。在同一时期的巴尔干遗址中,一组高纯度的铜制品很常见,可能来自单一来源,目前尚不清楚。一小部分人工制品可能来自比霍尔地区。这些结果可以解释为一个长距离的声望交换网络,在这个网络中,一套复合的装饰品在很长的距离内流通,原材料的来源地区和它们最终沉积的地点并不一定是直接联系在一起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The myth of Mecsek malachite used in the Late Neolithic Carpathian Basin– the provenance of Late Neolithic malachite and copper artefacts from South-eastern Transdanubia

In the second half of the Late Neolithic (4700 − 4500 cal BCE), the first malachite and copper artefacts appeared in large quantities in the territory of present-day Hungary. They are known only as grave goods such as beads, rings and bracelets. Copper artefacts are concentrated in South-eastern Transdanubia, and archaeological literature has argued that this copper wealth may have been due to the exploitation of local malachite resources in the Mecsek Mountains. In our study, we compared lead isotope and chemical composition measurements of Mecsek malachite sources, Late Neolithic malachite and copper artefacts, and other potential ore sources to investigate the provenance of the raw material of these artefacts. The results of our analysis clearly exclude the exploitation of local, Mecsek sources. The malachite and copper artefacts found in the same grave may have come from the same source in the majority of the cases. This suggests that a set of ornaments was made using either technology. Among the potential sources, several mining regions emerged, primarily in the territory of present-day Bulgaria. A group of copper artefacts with high purity, common in contemporaneous Balkan sites, may come from a single source, which remains unknown. A smaller group of artefacts might be derived from the Bihor region. These results can be interpreted as a long-distance prestige exchange network, in which a composite set of ornaments were circulated in long distances and the source areas of the raw materials and the sites where they were finally deposited were not certainly directly linked.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
期刊最新文献
Bronze alloying recipes of Yue state: new evidence from bronze artifacts and metal ingots unearthed at the Dahutou site in Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China Contrasting pathways to domestication and agriculture around Southwest Asia Let’s cut to the chase and rely on fracture mechanics to identify projectile armatures Multispecies pastoralism around Delgerkhaan Uul — local practices under large scale sociocultural and political shifts between 1800 BC and 200 AD Prehistoric human hand and footprints in Quesang on the central Tibetan Plateau from the Bølling-Allerød Interstadial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1