罗马晚期和移民时期立陶宛的精英——本地人还是移民?基于87Sr/86Sr稳定同位素分析对当前概念的重新解释

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w
Laurynas Kurila, Giedrė Piličiauskienė, Edvardas Simčenka, Kerstin Lidén, Ellen Kooijman, Žydrūnė Miliauskienė
{"title":"罗马晚期和移民时期立陶宛的精英——本地人还是移民?基于87Sr/86Sr稳定同位素分析对当前概念的重新解释","authors":"Laurynas Kurila,&nbsp;Giedrė Piličiauskienė,&nbsp;Edvardas Simčenka,&nbsp;Kerstin Lidén,&nbsp;Ellen Kooijman,&nbsp;Žydrūnė Miliauskienė","doi":"10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The archaeological record of the mid-1st millennium AD in Lithuania reveals marked changes in culture and influences from various regions of Europe, which are typically attributed to immigration. To assess the immigration hypothesis and mobility, we carried out <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr analysis on human teeth (<i>n</i> = 40) from 11 cemeteries. Samples were selected to evaluate the two supposed directions of immigration as well as mobility, both for individuals of different sexes and between different social groups. Even though 12 (30%) individuals were identified as non-locals, it is impossible to determine whether these individuals originated from other regions in Lithuania or from more distant regions due to the overlap of <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr baseline values. However, our results allowed us to dismiss the areas of origin that dominate in the archaeological debates, viz., Southeastern and Central Europe. The majority of non-local individuals were identified in Western and Central Lithuania, indicating that this region was characterised by a different mobility structure than that of Southern and Eastern Lithuania. There were no differences in mobility between males and females or between social groups. The identified mobility patterns most likely reflect established models of social behaviour rather than sudden transformations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Roman and Migration Period elites from Lithuania – locals or migrants? Reinterpretation of the current concept based on 87Sr/86Sr stable isotope analysis\",\"authors\":\"Laurynas Kurila,&nbsp;Giedrė Piličiauskienė,&nbsp;Edvardas Simčenka,&nbsp;Kerstin Lidén,&nbsp;Ellen Kooijman,&nbsp;Žydrūnė Miliauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The archaeological record of the mid-1st millennium AD in Lithuania reveals marked changes in culture and influences from various regions of Europe, which are typically attributed to immigration. To assess the immigration hypothesis and mobility, we carried out <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr analysis on human teeth (<i>n</i> = 40) from 11 cemeteries. Samples were selected to evaluate the two supposed directions of immigration as well as mobility, both for individuals of different sexes and between different social groups. Even though 12 (30%) individuals were identified as non-locals, it is impossible to determine whether these individuals originated from other regions in Lithuania or from more distant regions due to the overlap of <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr baseline values. However, our results allowed us to dismiss the areas of origin that dominate in the archaeological debates, viz., Southeastern and Central Europe. The majority of non-local individuals were identified in Western and Central Lithuania, indicating that this region was characterised by a different mobility structure than that of Southern and Eastern Lithuania. There were no differences in mobility between males and females or between social groups. The identified mobility patterns most likely reflect established models of social behaviour rather than sudden transformations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公元1千年中期,立陶宛的考古记录揭示了欧洲不同地区的文化和影响的显著变化,这些变化通常归因于移民。为了评估移民假说和流动性,我们对来自11个墓地的40颗人类牙齿进行了87Sr/86Sr分析。选择样本来评估两种假定的移民方向和流动性,既针对不同性别的个体,也针对不同社会群体。尽管有12人(30%)被确定为非本地人,但由于87Sr/86Sr基线值的重叠,无法确定这些人是来自立陶宛的其他地区还是来自更遥远的地区。然而,我们的研究结果使我们能够排除在考古争论中占主导地位的起源地区,即欧洲东南部和中欧。大多数非本地个人分布在立陶宛西部和中部,这表明该地区的流动结构与立陶宛南部和东部不同。男性和女性之间或社会群体之间的流动性没有差异。已确定的流动模式最有可能反映的是既定的社会行为模式,而不是突然的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Late Roman and Migration Period elites from Lithuania – locals or migrants? Reinterpretation of the current concept based on 87Sr/86Sr stable isotope analysis

The archaeological record of the mid-1st millennium AD in Lithuania reveals marked changes in culture and influences from various regions of Europe, which are typically attributed to immigration. To assess the immigration hypothesis and mobility, we carried out 87Sr/86Sr analysis on human teeth (n = 40) from 11 cemeteries. Samples were selected to evaluate the two supposed directions of immigration as well as mobility, both for individuals of different sexes and between different social groups. Even though 12 (30%) individuals were identified as non-locals, it is impossible to determine whether these individuals originated from other regions in Lithuania or from more distant regions due to the overlap of 87Sr/86Sr baseline values. However, our results allowed us to dismiss the areas of origin that dominate in the archaeological debates, viz., Southeastern and Central Europe. The majority of non-local individuals were identified in Western and Central Lithuania, indicating that this region was characterised by a different mobility structure than that of Southern and Eastern Lithuania. There were no differences in mobility between males and females or between social groups. The identified mobility patterns most likely reflect established models of social behaviour rather than sudden transformations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
期刊最新文献
Bronze alloying recipes of Yue state: new evidence from bronze artifacts and metal ingots unearthed at the Dahutou site in Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China Contrasting pathways to domestication and agriculture around Southwest Asia Let’s cut to the chase and rely on fracture mechanics to identify projectile armatures Multispecies pastoralism around Delgerkhaan Uul — local practices under large scale sociocultural and political shifts between 1800 BC and 200 AD Prehistoric human hand and footprints in Quesang on the central Tibetan Plateau from the Bølling-Allerød Interstadial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1