{"title":"罗马晚期和移民时期立陶宛的精英——本地人还是移民?基于87Sr/86Sr稳定同位素分析对当前概念的重新解释","authors":"Laurynas Kurila, Giedrė Piličiauskienė, Edvardas Simčenka, Kerstin Lidén, Ellen Kooijman, Žydrūnė Miliauskienė","doi":"10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The archaeological record of the mid-1st millennium AD in Lithuania reveals marked changes in culture and influences from various regions of Europe, which are typically attributed to immigration. To assess the immigration hypothesis and mobility, we carried out <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr analysis on human teeth (<i>n</i> = 40) from 11 cemeteries. Samples were selected to evaluate the two supposed directions of immigration as well as mobility, both for individuals of different sexes and between different social groups. Even though 12 (30%) individuals were identified as non-locals, it is impossible to determine whether these individuals originated from other regions in Lithuania or from more distant regions due to the overlap of <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr baseline values. However, our results allowed us to dismiss the areas of origin that dominate in the archaeological debates, viz., Southeastern and Central Europe. The majority of non-local individuals were identified in Western and Central Lithuania, indicating that this region was characterised by a different mobility structure than that of Southern and Eastern Lithuania. There were no differences in mobility between males and females or between social groups. The identified mobility patterns most likely reflect established models of social behaviour rather than sudden transformations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Roman and Migration Period elites from Lithuania – locals or migrants? Reinterpretation of the current concept based on 87Sr/86Sr stable isotope analysis\",\"authors\":\"Laurynas Kurila, Giedrė Piličiauskienė, Edvardas Simčenka, Kerstin Lidén, Ellen Kooijman, Žydrūnė Miliauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The archaeological record of the mid-1st millennium AD in Lithuania reveals marked changes in culture and influences from various regions of Europe, which are typically attributed to immigration. To assess the immigration hypothesis and mobility, we carried out <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr analysis on human teeth (<i>n</i> = 40) from 11 cemeteries. Samples were selected to evaluate the two supposed directions of immigration as well as mobility, both for individuals of different sexes and between different social groups. Even though 12 (30%) individuals were identified as non-locals, it is impossible to determine whether these individuals originated from other regions in Lithuania or from more distant regions due to the overlap of <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr baseline values. However, our results allowed us to dismiss the areas of origin that dominate in the archaeological debates, viz., Southeastern and Central Europe. The majority of non-local individuals were identified in Western and Central Lithuania, indicating that this region was characterised by a different mobility structure than that of Southern and Eastern Lithuania. There were no differences in mobility between males and females or between social groups. The identified mobility patterns most likely reflect established models of social behaviour rather than sudden transformations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02151-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Late Roman and Migration Period elites from Lithuania – locals or migrants? Reinterpretation of the current concept based on 87Sr/86Sr stable isotope analysis
The archaeological record of the mid-1st millennium AD in Lithuania reveals marked changes in culture and influences from various regions of Europe, which are typically attributed to immigration. To assess the immigration hypothesis and mobility, we carried out 87Sr/86Sr analysis on human teeth (n = 40) from 11 cemeteries. Samples were selected to evaluate the two supposed directions of immigration as well as mobility, both for individuals of different sexes and between different social groups. Even though 12 (30%) individuals were identified as non-locals, it is impossible to determine whether these individuals originated from other regions in Lithuania or from more distant regions due to the overlap of 87Sr/86Sr baseline values. However, our results allowed us to dismiss the areas of origin that dominate in the archaeological debates, viz., Southeastern and Central Europe. The majority of non-local individuals were identified in Western and Central Lithuania, indicating that this region was characterised by a different mobility structure than that of Southern and Eastern Lithuania. There were no differences in mobility between males and females or between social groups. The identified mobility patterns most likely reflect established models of social behaviour rather than sudden transformations.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research.
Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science.
The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).