浅埋大直径盾构隧道地压数值分析及光纤光栅监测新方法——以黄鹤塔隧道工程为例

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s10064-025-04088-3
Leyang Fan, Lan Cui, Zeqi Zhu, Qian Sheng, Junjie Zheng, Youkou Dong
{"title":"浅埋大直径盾构隧道地压数值分析及光纤光栅监测新方法——以黄鹤塔隧道工程为例","authors":"Leyang Fan,&nbsp;Lan Cui,&nbsp;Zeqi Zhu,&nbsp;Qian Sheng,&nbsp;Junjie Zheng,&nbsp;Youkou Dong","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04088-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The determination of ground pressure is an important prerequisite for the design load of tunnel. Currently, in the emerging field of shallow rock large diameter shield tunnels, the study of ground pressure is limited by the lack of comprehensive engineering case studies and experimental data. This study provides a comparison of elaborate numerical analysis method and Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) monitoring method for the ground pressure in a shallow rock large-diameter shield tunnel based on a case study. Firstly, the elaborate 3D numerical model is developed by finite difference software to simulate the process of shield tunnelling. Construction details such as the force distribution, liner application, over-excavation gap and shield tail gap are considered in the simulation process. The elaborate numerical analysis method for the ground pressure in shallow rock large-diameter shield tunnels is presented. Then, using the elaborate numerical analysis method, the impact of key parameters such as support force at the tunnel face, grouting pressure, tunnel diameter, and tunnel depth on ground pressure are assessed. The new FBG monitoring method is developed to measure ground pressure in shallow rock large-diameter tunnel. Finally, the ground pressure obtained by the elaborate numerical analysis method is compared with that obtained by the new FBG monitoring method. The result shows that the elaborate numerical analysis method is generally larger than the new FBG monitoring method, with a reasonable 15% difference. The ground pressure that obtained by FBG monitoring shows the initial rapid increase, followed by gradual increase, eventually stabilising.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elaborate numerical analysis and new fibre Bragg grating monitoring methods for the ground pressure in shallow large-diameter shield tunnels: a case study of the yellow crane tower tunnel project\",\"authors\":\"Leyang Fan,&nbsp;Lan Cui,&nbsp;Zeqi Zhu,&nbsp;Qian Sheng,&nbsp;Junjie Zheng,&nbsp;Youkou Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10064-025-04088-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The determination of ground pressure is an important prerequisite for the design load of tunnel. Currently, in the emerging field of shallow rock large diameter shield tunnels, the study of ground pressure is limited by the lack of comprehensive engineering case studies and experimental data. This study provides a comparison of elaborate numerical analysis method and Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) monitoring method for the ground pressure in a shallow rock large-diameter shield tunnel based on a case study. Firstly, the elaborate 3D numerical model is developed by finite difference software to simulate the process of shield tunnelling. Construction details such as the force distribution, liner application, over-excavation gap and shield tail gap are considered in the simulation process. The elaborate numerical analysis method for the ground pressure in shallow rock large-diameter shield tunnels is presented. Then, using the elaborate numerical analysis method, the impact of key parameters such as support force at the tunnel face, grouting pressure, tunnel diameter, and tunnel depth on ground pressure are assessed. The new FBG monitoring method is developed to measure ground pressure in shallow rock large-diameter tunnel. Finally, the ground pressure obtained by the elaborate numerical analysis method is compared with that obtained by the new FBG monitoring method. The result shows that the elaborate numerical analysis method is generally larger than the new FBG monitoring method, with a reasonable 15% difference. The ground pressure that obtained by FBG monitoring shows the initial rapid increase, followed by gradual increase, eventually stabilising.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"84 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04088-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04088-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地压的确定是确定隧道设计荷载的重要前提。目前,在浅岩大直径盾构隧道这一新兴领域中,地压研究缺乏全面的工程案例研究和实验数据。以某浅埋岩石大直径盾构隧道为例,比较了精细数值分析方法与光纤光栅监测方法对隧道地压的影响。首先,利用有限差分软件建立了复杂的三维数值模型,模拟了盾构掘进过程。在模拟过程中考虑了受力分布、衬砌、超开挖间隙和盾构尾间隙等施工细节。提出了浅埋大直径盾构隧道地压的详细数值分析方法。然后,采用精细数值分析方法,评估了巷道工作面支护力、注浆压力、隧道直径、隧道深度等关键参数对地压的影响。提出了一种新的光纤光栅监测方法,用于测量浅埋岩石大直径隧道地压。最后,将该数值分析方法得到的地压与新型光纤光栅监测方法得到的地压进行了比较。结果表明,精细化的数值分析方法总体上大于新的FBG监测方法,相差15%。FBG监测得到的地压显示出最初的快速增加,随后逐渐增加,最终趋于稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elaborate numerical analysis and new fibre Bragg grating monitoring methods for the ground pressure in shallow large-diameter shield tunnels: a case study of the yellow crane tower tunnel project

The determination of ground pressure is an important prerequisite for the design load of tunnel. Currently, in the emerging field of shallow rock large diameter shield tunnels, the study of ground pressure is limited by the lack of comprehensive engineering case studies and experimental data. This study provides a comparison of elaborate numerical analysis method and Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) monitoring method for the ground pressure in a shallow rock large-diameter shield tunnel based on a case study. Firstly, the elaborate 3D numerical model is developed by finite difference software to simulate the process of shield tunnelling. Construction details such as the force distribution, liner application, over-excavation gap and shield tail gap are considered in the simulation process. The elaborate numerical analysis method for the ground pressure in shallow rock large-diameter shield tunnels is presented. Then, using the elaborate numerical analysis method, the impact of key parameters such as support force at the tunnel face, grouting pressure, tunnel diameter, and tunnel depth on ground pressure are assessed. The new FBG monitoring method is developed to measure ground pressure in shallow rock large-diameter tunnel. Finally, the ground pressure obtained by the elaborate numerical analysis method is compared with that obtained by the new FBG monitoring method. The result shows that the elaborate numerical analysis method is generally larger than the new FBG monitoring method, with a reasonable 15% difference. The ground pressure that obtained by FBG monitoring shows the initial rapid increase, followed by gradual increase, eventually stabilising.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
期刊最新文献
Unified rock pillar strength formula for mine design Dynamic impact of hillslope landslide sediment transfer to ecological environment recovery in earthquake disturbed area Diametric splitting strength of compacted expansive soils and modified soils at different water contents Increasing landslide deformation and activity in a changing local environment: a case study of Zhouqu County in the Bailong River Basin The Mudui deep-seated debris slide in Sichuan Province, China: Failure mechanism, kinematics, and effects of remedial works based on multidisciplinary data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1