{"title":"比较PD-L1和PD-1抑制剂加贝伐单抗联合肝动脉介入治疗不可修复的肝细胞癌:一项单中心,现实世界的研究","authors":"Minrui He, Wa Xie, Ze Yuan, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yizhen Fu, Zili Hu, Qi Meng, Wenqing Gao, Dandan Hu, Yaojun Zhang, Yangxun Pan, Zhongguo Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rise of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimens, particularly bevacizumab and atezolizumab, as first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need to explore PD-L1 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in combination therapies for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Integrating systemic therapies with locoregional approaches is also emerging as a potent strategy. This study compares the outcomes of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and sintilimab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) with bevacizumab or its biosimilar, combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) in uHCC patients. From January 2020 to September 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 uHCC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cohort included 69 patients treated with atezolizumab with bevacizumab (Bev/Ate) and 69 with bevacizumab biosimilar with sintilimab (Bio/Sin), combined with HAIT. The propensity score matching was also employed to further explore the efficacy and safety. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.8 months for the Bev/Ate group and 10.0 months for the Bio/Sin group (p = 0.188). The Bev/Ate group showed significantly longer intrahepatic mPFS (HR 0.381; 95% confidence interval 0.176-0.824; p = .018) and higher overall response rates compared with the Bio/Sin group (60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001; 69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = .024) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (p > .050). Combining atezolizumab or sintilimab with bevacizumab or its biosimilar alongside HAIT provided similar overall PFS in uHCC patients. However, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination with HAIT showed superior intrahepatic PFS and control rates, warranting further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1972-1985"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresetable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study.\",\"authors\":\"Minrui He, Wa Xie, Ze Yuan, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yizhen Fu, Zili Hu, Qi Meng, Wenqing Gao, Dandan Hu, Yaojun Zhang, Yangxun Pan, Zhongguo Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.35341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the rise of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimens, particularly bevacizumab and atezolizumab, as first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need to explore PD-L1 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in combination therapies for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Integrating systemic therapies with locoregional approaches is also emerging as a potent strategy. This study compares the outcomes of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and sintilimab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) with bevacizumab or its biosimilar, combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) in uHCC patients. From January 2020 to September 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 uHCC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cohort included 69 patients treated with atezolizumab with bevacizumab (Bev/Ate) and 69 with bevacizumab biosimilar with sintilimab (Bio/Sin), combined with HAIT. The propensity score matching was also employed to further explore the efficacy and safety. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.8 months for the Bev/Ate group and 10.0 months for the Bio/Sin group (p = 0.188). The Bev/Ate group showed significantly longer intrahepatic mPFS (HR 0.381; 95% confidence interval 0.176-0.824; p = .018) and higher overall response rates compared with the Bio/Sin group (60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001; 69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = .024) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (p > .050). Combining atezolizumab or sintilimab with bevacizumab or its biosimilar alongside HAIT provided similar overall PFS in uHCC patients. However, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination with HAIT showed superior intrahepatic PFS and control rates, warranting further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1972-1985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35341\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着抗血管内皮生长因子抗体和程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)方案,特别是贝伐单抗和阿特唑单抗,作为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的一线治疗方案的增加,有必要探索PD-L1和程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂在不可切除的HCC (uHCC)联合治疗中的应用。将全身治疗与局部治疗相结合也正在成为一种有效的策略。本研究比较了阿特唑单抗(PD-L1抑制剂)和辛替单抗(程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂)与贝伐单抗或其生物仿制药联合肝动脉介入治疗(HAIT)治疗uHCC患者的结果。2020年1月至2023年9月,对中山大学肿瘤中心138例uHCC患者进行回顾性分析。该队列包括69例用阿特唑单抗联合贝伐单抗(Bev/Ate)治疗的患者和69例用贝伐单抗生物类似药联合辛替单抗(Bio/Sin)联合HAIT治疗的患者。采用倾向评分匹配法进一步探讨其疗效和安全性。Bev/Ate组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为13.8个月,Bio/Sin组为10.0个月(p = 0.188)。Bev/Ate组肝内mPFS显著延长(HR 0.381;95%置信区间0.176-0.824;p = .018),总有效率高于Bio/Sin组(60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001;69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = 0.024),基于实体瘤v1.1版疗效评价标准和修改后的实体瘤疗效评价标准。治疗相关不良事件组间相似(p < 0.05)。阿特唑单抗或辛替单抗联合贝伐单抗或其生物类似药与HAIT联合使用在uHCC患者中提供了相似的总体PFS。然而,atezolizumab-bevacizumab联合HAIT显示出更好的肝内PFS和控制率,值得进一步验证。
Comparing PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresetable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study.
With the rise of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimens, particularly bevacizumab and atezolizumab, as first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need to explore PD-L1 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in combination therapies for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Integrating systemic therapies with locoregional approaches is also emerging as a potent strategy. This study compares the outcomes of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and sintilimab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) with bevacizumab or its biosimilar, combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) in uHCC patients. From January 2020 to September 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 uHCC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cohort included 69 patients treated with atezolizumab with bevacizumab (Bev/Ate) and 69 with bevacizumab biosimilar with sintilimab (Bio/Sin), combined with HAIT. The propensity score matching was also employed to further explore the efficacy and safety. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.8 months for the Bev/Ate group and 10.0 months for the Bio/Sin group (p = 0.188). The Bev/Ate group showed significantly longer intrahepatic mPFS (HR 0.381; 95% confidence interval 0.176-0.824; p = .018) and higher overall response rates compared with the Bio/Sin group (60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001; 69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = .024) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (p > .050). Combining atezolizumab or sintilimab with bevacizumab or its biosimilar alongside HAIT provided similar overall PFS in uHCC patients. However, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination with HAIT showed superior intrahepatic PFS and control rates, warranting further validation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention