在PASART-1和PASART-2试验中,新辅助帕唑帕尼和放射治疗软组织肉瘤的参与者的长期生存率。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Acta Oncologica Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42333
Bauke H G Van Riet, Milan Van Meekeren, Marta Fiocco, Aisha Miah, Ilse De Pree, Lisette M Wiltink, Astrid Scholten, Lotte Heimans, Judith V M G Bovée, Hans Gelderblom, Neeltje Steeghs, Rick L Haas
{"title":"在PASART-1和PASART-2试验中,新辅助帕唑帕尼和放射治疗软组织肉瘤的参与者的长期生存率。","authors":"Bauke H G Van Riet, Milan Van Meekeren, Marta Fiocco, Aisha Miah, Ilse De Pree, Lisette M Wiltink, Astrid Scholten, Lotte Heimans, Judith V M G Bovée, Hans Gelderblom, Neeltje Steeghs, Rick L Haas","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with high-risk non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities treated in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials, as well as to compare the PASART cohorts to a control cohort receiving standard treatment during the same time period from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (IKNL) to investigate if adding pazopanib improves Overall Survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Updated follow-up data on disease control, survival and long-term toxicities of the PASART-trials were extracted from electronic patient records. The effect of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy on OS was investigated by comparing the combined PASART cohorts to the IKNL cohort via direct comparison and exact matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PASART-trials included 34 patients, IKNL cohort included 487 patients. After a median follow-up of 75.4 months (range: 30-131 months) the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year OS in the PASART-trials were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.5-100), 85.3% (95% CI: 74.2-98.1), 79.3% (95% CI: 66.8-94.2), respectively. Matching resulted in 23 PASART and 89 IKNL patients. Adding pazopanib did not significantly improve OS when compared to standard treatment (IKNL) in a direct comparison (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.30-1.13) or matched analysis (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.29-1.73). Long-term toxicities, mainly fibrosis (n = 6) and edema (n = 2), were observed in 11 PASART patients and comparable to historical controls.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The addition of pazopanib had tolerable long-term toxicity but did not improve OS when compared to a control cohort receiving standard treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term survival of participants in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials of neo-adjuvant pazopanib and radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.\",\"authors\":\"Bauke H G Van Riet, Milan Van Meekeren, Marta Fiocco, Aisha Miah, Ilse De Pree, Lisette M Wiltink, Astrid Scholten, Lotte Heimans, Judith V M G Bovée, Hans Gelderblom, Neeltje Steeghs, Rick L Haas\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with high-risk non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities treated in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials, as well as to compare the PASART cohorts to a control cohort receiving standard treatment during the same time period from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (IKNL) to investigate if adding pazopanib improves Overall Survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Updated follow-up data on disease control, survival and long-term toxicities of the PASART-trials were extracted from electronic patient records. The effect of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy on OS was investigated by comparing the combined PASART cohorts to the IKNL cohort via direct comparison and exact matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PASART-trials included 34 patients, IKNL cohort included 487 patients. After a median follow-up of 75.4 months (range: 30-131 months) the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year OS in the PASART-trials were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.5-100), 85.3% (95% CI: 74.2-98.1), 79.3% (95% CI: 66.8-94.2), respectively. Matching resulted in 23 PASART and 89 IKNL patients. Adding pazopanib did not significantly improve OS when compared to standard treatment (IKNL) in a direct comparison (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.30-1.13) or matched analysis (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.29-1.73). Long-term toxicities, mainly fibrosis (n = 6) and edema (n = 2), were observed in 11 PASART patients and comparable to historical controls.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The addition of pazopanib had tolerable long-term toxicity but did not improve OS when compared to a control cohort receiving standard treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"69-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究旨在评估PASART-1和PASART-2试验中治疗的躯干和四肢高风险非转移性软组织肉瘤患者在新辅助放疗后手术的长期安全性和有效性,并将PASART队列与荷兰癌症登记处(IKNL)同期接受标准治疗的对照队列进行比较,以研究添加pazopanib是否能提高总生存期(OS)。方法:从电子病历中提取pasart试验的疾病控制、生存和长期毒性的最新随访数据。通过直接比较和精确匹配分析,将PASART联合队列与IKNL队列进行比较,研究新辅助放疗中加入帕唑帕尼对OS的影响。结果:pasart试验纳入34例患者,IKNL队列纳入487例患者。在中位随访75.4个月(范围:30-131个月)后,pasart试验的1年、2年和5年OS分别为97%(95%可信区间[CI]: 91.5-100)、85.3% (95% CI: 74.2-98.1)、79.3% (95% CI: 67.8 -94.2)。配对结果为23例PASART和89例IKNL。在直接比较中,与标准治疗(IKNL)相比,添加帕唑帕尼(pazopanib)没有显著改善OS(风险比[HR]: 0.58;95% CI: 0.30-1.13)或匹配分析(HR: 0.70;95% ci: 0.29-1.73)。在11例PASART患者中观察到长期毒性,主要是纤维化(n = 6)和水肿(n = 2),与历史对照组相当。解释:与接受标准治疗的对照队列相比,添加pazopanib具有可耐受的长期毒性,但没有改善OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term survival of participants in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials of neo-adjuvant pazopanib and radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

Objective: This study aims to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with high-risk non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities treated in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials, as well as to compare the PASART cohorts to a control cohort receiving standard treatment during the same time period from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (IKNL) to investigate if adding pazopanib improves Overall Survival (OS).

Methods: Updated follow-up data on disease control, survival and long-term toxicities of the PASART-trials were extracted from electronic patient records. The effect of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy on OS was investigated by comparing the combined PASART cohorts to the IKNL cohort via direct comparison and exact matching analysis.

Results: PASART-trials included 34 patients, IKNL cohort included 487 patients. After a median follow-up of 75.4 months (range: 30-131 months) the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year OS in the PASART-trials were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.5-100), 85.3% (95% CI: 74.2-98.1), 79.3% (95% CI: 66.8-94.2), respectively. Matching resulted in 23 PASART and 89 IKNL patients. Adding pazopanib did not significantly improve OS when compared to standard treatment (IKNL) in a direct comparison (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.30-1.13) or matched analysis (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.29-1.73). Long-term toxicities, mainly fibrosis (n = 6) and edema (n = 2), were observed in 11 PASART patients and comparable to historical controls.

Interpretation: The addition of pazopanib had tolerable long-term toxicity but did not improve OS when compared to a control cohort receiving standard treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
期刊最新文献
Considerable decline in prostate cancer mortality in Nordic countries after 2000. Organ preservation, for rectal cancer: general overview of the latest data from phase III randomized trials. Are breast cancer patients with low distress at diagnosis at risk of psychological symptoms later in their disease trajectory? Considerations for when to screen for distress. Exploring how attachment insecurities mediate the link between sexual and partnership satisfaction in adolescents and young adults with cancer. Prevalence of lymphedema symptoms across cancer diagnoses and association with depression, pain interference and health-related quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1