一项前瞻性对照随机研究:留用氦等离子体改善大量减肥后腹部成形术患者皮肤松弛的疗效。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1
Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Riccardo De Bernardis, Beniamino Brunetti, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti
{"title":"一项前瞻性对照随机研究:留用氦等离子体改善大量减肥后腹部成形术患者皮肤松弛的疗效。","authors":"Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Riccardo De Bernardis, Beniamino Brunetti, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renuvion was the first FDA approved helium plasma device utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of Renuvion improves the outcomes, skin quality and reduces the edema faster after lipoabdominoplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence v: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Renuvion Helium Plasma to Improve the Appearance of Loose Skin in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty After Massive Weight Loss: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Riccardo De Bernardis, Beniamino Brunetti, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renuvion was the first FDA approved helium plasma device utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of Renuvion improves the outcomes, skin quality and reduces the edema faster after lipoabdominoplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence v: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:Renuvion是第一个获得FDA批准的氦等离子装置,用于皮下组织加热,以减少皮肤松弛。本研究的目的是证明Renuvion的使用改善了脂肪腹部成形术后的预后、皮肤质量和减少水肿的速度更快。材料和方法:本研究纳入体重减轻至少20 kg后腹部皮肤松弛的患者,非吸烟者,无主要合并症,随访至少2年,标准化术前和术后照片。随机分为两组:第一组,单独做脂肪腹部成形术;第二组:脂肪腹部成形术及留脂术。患者和两位测量结果的作者都对治疗方法不知情。术后对所有患者进行BODY-Q腹部满意度和多余皮肤鳞片评估。两位独立的整形外科医生审查了照片,并根据1-5的视觉模拟量表(VAS)对结果进行了评分。同时进行捏片试验和皮下组织超声检查。结果:纳入76例患者,其中男性33例,女性43例,年龄在20 ~ 50岁之间。第2组患者在6个月(p = 0.007)、1年(p = 0.021)和2年(p = 0.024)评估中对腹部评分的BODY-Q满意度较高。结论:数据显示,与单独进行脂肪腹部成形术的患者相比,接受Renuvion治疗的患者腹部皮肤松弛的改善明显更大。这是第一个关于Renuvion和脂肪腹部成形术的前瞻性随机研究,可以被认为是一个试点研究。证据等级v:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Renuvion Helium Plasma to Improve the Appearance of Loose Skin in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty After Massive Weight Loss: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.

Introduction: Renuvion was the first FDA approved helium plasma device utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of Renuvion improves the outcomes, skin quality and reduces the edema faster after lipoabdominoplasty.

Materials and methods: Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.

Results: Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.

Conclusions: Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.

Level of evidence v: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Global Landscape of Knowledge Mapping and Research Trends in Hyaluronic Acid for Wound Healing: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (1952-2023). Mending a World of Problems: 12-Year Review of Medical Tourism Inbound Complications in a Tertiary Centre. Prognosis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Flap Necrosis: Predictors of Failure and Salvage. The Top 100 Cited Articles in Male Aesthetic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis. Upper Blepharoplasty for Dermatochalasis With or Without Resection of the Orbicularis Oculi Muscle, Preaponeurotic and Nasal Fat Pads: A Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1