Viraj V Patel, Eli A Andrade, Rebecca Zimba, Chloe Mirzayi, Chenshu Zhang, Michael Kharfen, Rupali Doshi, Denis Nash, Christian Grov
{"title":"同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者对艾滋病预防护理的偏好:一项大型离散选择实验。","authors":"Viraj V Patel, Eli A Andrade, Rebecca Zimba, Chloe Mirzayi, Chenshu Zhang, Michael Kharfen, Rupali Doshi, Denis Nash, Christian Grov","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify preferences for PrEP care among diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BLGBM) in the US with discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted two DCEs to elicit care delivery preferences for Starting and Continuing PrEP among 16-49 year-old HIV negative GBM not using PrEP from across the United States. DCEs assessed preferences for care options including location, formulation (pills, injectable), lab testing, and costs. Participants completed 16 choice tasks and utility scores and relative importance were estimated. We performed latent class analyses to identify groups within each DCE, and multivariable logistic regression to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with class membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1514 participants, 46.5% identified as Latino, 21.4% Black, and 25.2 White. For Starting PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \"In-Person\" (28.5%) which preferred in-person care and lab testing, and \"Virtual\" (71.5%) which preferred telehealth and at-home lab testing. For Continuing PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \"Pills\" (23.6%) which preferred oral PrEP with low-cost options and \"No Cost/Injectable\" (76.4%) which strongly preferred no-costs and injectable PrEP. In multivariable models for Starting PrEP and for Continuing PrEP, latent class membership was significantly associated with a range of sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, housing instability, and provider and PrEP stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preferences identified for PrEP care in this diverse GBM sample indicate the need for multiple care and formulation choices including elimination of costs to improve PrEP uptake. DCE findings can guide implementation efforts to improve equitable access to PrEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for HIV PrEP care among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: a large discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Viraj V Patel, Eli A Andrade, Rebecca Zimba, Chloe Mirzayi, Chenshu Zhang, Michael Kharfen, Rupali Doshi, Denis Nash, Christian Grov\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify preferences for PrEP care among diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BLGBM) in the US with discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted two DCEs to elicit care delivery preferences for Starting and Continuing PrEP among 16-49 year-old HIV negative GBM not using PrEP from across the United States. DCEs assessed preferences for care options including location, formulation (pills, injectable), lab testing, and costs. Participants completed 16 choice tasks and utility scores and relative importance were estimated. We performed latent class analyses to identify groups within each DCE, and multivariable logistic regression to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with class membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1514 participants, 46.5% identified as Latino, 21.4% Black, and 25.2 White. For Starting PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \\\"In-Person\\\" (28.5%) which preferred in-person care and lab testing, and \\\"Virtual\\\" (71.5%) which preferred telehealth and at-home lab testing. For Continuing PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \\\"Pills\\\" (23.6%) which preferred oral PrEP with low-cost options and \\\"No Cost/Injectable\\\" (76.4%) which strongly preferred no-costs and injectable PrEP. In multivariable models for Starting PrEP and for Continuing PrEP, latent class membership was significantly associated with a range of sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, housing instability, and provider and PrEP stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preferences identified for PrEP care in this diverse GBM sample indicate the need for multiple care and formulation choices including elimination of costs to improve PrEP uptake. DCE findings can guide implementation efforts to improve equitable access to PrEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preferences for HIV PrEP care among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: a large discrete choice experiment.
Objective: We aimed to identify preferences for PrEP care among diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BLGBM) in the US with discrete choice experiment (DCE).
Design: We conducted two DCEs to elicit care delivery preferences for Starting and Continuing PrEP among 16-49 year-old HIV negative GBM not using PrEP from across the United States. DCEs assessed preferences for care options including location, formulation (pills, injectable), lab testing, and costs. Participants completed 16 choice tasks and utility scores and relative importance were estimated. We performed latent class analyses to identify groups within each DCE, and multivariable logistic regression to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with class membership.
Results: Among 1514 participants, 46.5% identified as Latino, 21.4% Black, and 25.2 White. For Starting PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: "In-Person" (28.5%) which preferred in-person care and lab testing, and "Virtual" (71.5%) which preferred telehealth and at-home lab testing. For Continuing PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: "Pills" (23.6%) which preferred oral PrEP with low-cost options and "No Cost/Injectable" (76.4%) which strongly preferred no-costs and injectable PrEP. In multivariable models for Starting PrEP and for Continuing PrEP, latent class membership was significantly associated with a range of sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, housing instability, and provider and PrEP stigma.
Conclusions: The preferences identified for PrEP care in this diverse GBM sample indicate the need for multiple care and formulation choices including elimination of costs to improve PrEP uptake. DCE findings can guide implementation efforts to improve equitable access to PrEP.
期刊介绍:
Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.