同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者对艾滋病预防护理的偏好:一项大型离散选择实验。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY AIDS Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124
Viraj V Patel, Eli A Andrade, Rebecca Zimba, Chloe Mirzayi, Chenshu Zhang, Michael Kharfen, Rupali Doshi, Denis Nash, Christian Grov
{"title":"同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者对艾滋病预防护理的偏好:一项大型离散选择实验。","authors":"Viraj V Patel, Eli A Andrade, Rebecca Zimba, Chloe Mirzayi, Chenshu Zhang, Michael Kharfen, Rupali Doshi, Denis Nash, Christian Grov","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify preferences for PrEP care among diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BLGBM) in the US with discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted two DCEs to elicit care delivery preferences for Starting and Continuing PrEP among 16-49 year-old HIV negative GBM not using PrEP from across the United States. DCEs assessed preferences for care options including location, formulation (pills, injectable), lab testing, and costs. Participants completed 16 choice tasks and utility scores and relative importance were estimated. We performed latent class analyses to identify groups within each DCE, and multivariable logistic regression to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with class membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1514 participants, 46.5% identified as Latino, 21.4% Black, and 25.2 White. For Starting PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \"In-Person\" (28.5%) which preferred in-person care and lab testing, and \"Virtual\" (71.5%) which preferred telehealth and at-home lab testing. For Continuing PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \"Pills\" (23.6%) which preferred oral PrEP with low-cost options and \"No Cost/Injectable\" (76.4%) which strongly preferred no-costs and injectable PrEP. In multivariable models for Starting PrEP and for Continuing PrEP, latent class membership was significantly associated with a range of sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, housing instability, and provider and PrEP stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preferences identified for PrEP care in this diverse GBM sample indicate the need for multiple care and formulation choices including elimination of costs to improve PrEP uptake. DCE findings can guide implementation efforts to improve equitable access to PrEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for HIV PrEP care among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: a large discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Viraj V Patel, Eli A Andrade, Rebecca Zimba, Chloe Mirzayi, Chenshu Zhang, Michael Kharfen, Rupali Doshi, Denis Nash, Christian Grov\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify preferences for PrEP care among diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BLGBM) in the US with discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted two DCEs to elicit care delivery preferences for Starting and Continuing PrEP among 16-49 year-old HIV negative GBM not using PrEP from across the United States. DCEs assessed preferences for care options including location, formulation (pills, injectable), lab testing, and costs. Participants completed 16 choice tasks and utility scores and relative importance were estimated. We performed latent class analyses to identify groups within each DCE, and multivariable logistic regression to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with class membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1514 participants, 46.5% identified as Latino, 21.4% Black, and 25.2 White. For Starting PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \\\"In-Person\\\" (28.5%) which preferred in-person care and lab testing, and \\\"Virtual\\\" (71.5%) which preferred telehealth and at-home lab testing. For Continuing PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: \\\"Pills\\\" (23.6%) which preferred oral PrEP with low-cost options and \\\"No Cost/Injectable\\\" (76.4%) which strongly preferred no-costs and injectable PrEP. In multivariable models for Starting PrEP and for Continuing PrEP, latent class membership was significantly associated with a range of sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, housing instability, and provider and PrEP stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preferences identified for PrEP care in this diverse GBM sample indicate the need for multiple care and formulation choices including elimination of costs to improve PrEP uptake. DCE findings can guide implementation efforts to improve equitable access to PrEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在通过离散选择实验(DCE)确定美国同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(BLGBM)对PrEP护理的偏好。设计:我们进行了两次dce,以了解美国各地16-49岁未使用PrEP的HIV阴性GBM中开始和继续PrEP的护理提供偏好。dce评估了护理选择的偏好,包括地点、配方(丸剂、注射剂)、实验室检测和费用。参与者完成16项选择任务,评估效用得分和相对重要性。我们进行了潜在类别分析,以确定每个DCE中的群体,并进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定与类别成员相关的社会人口统计学特征。结果:在1514名参与者中,46.5%为拉丁裔,21.4%为黑人,25.2%为白人。对于开始PrEP DCE,确定了两个潜在类别:“面对面”(28.5%)倾向于面对面护理和实验室检测,“虚拟”(71.5%)倾向于远程医疗和家庭实验室检测。对于持续PrEP DCE,确定了两个潜在类别:“药丸”(23.6%)倾向于口服PrEP和低成本选择,“无成本/注射”(76.4%)强烈倾向于无成本和注射PrEP。在开始PrEP和持续PrEP的多变量模型中,潜在类别成员与一系列社会人口统计学特征显著相关,包括种族/民族,收入,住房不稳定,提供者和PrEP耻辱。结论:在这种不同的GBM样本中确定的PrEP护理偏好表明需要多种护理和配方选择,包括消除成本以提高PrEP的吸收。DCE的调查结果可以指导实施工作,以改善公平获得PrEP的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preferences for HIV PrEP care among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: a large discrete choice experiment.

Objective: We aimed to identify preferences for PrEP care among diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BLGBM) in the US with discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Design: We conducted two DCEs to elicit care delivery preferences for Starting and Continuing PrEP among 16-49 year-old HIV negative GBM not using PrEP from across the United States. DCEs assessed preferences for care options including location, formulation (pills, injectable), lab testing, and costs. Participants completed 16 choice tasks and utility scores and relative importance were estimated. We performed latent class analyses to identify groups within each DCE, and multivariable logistic regression to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with class membership.

Results: Among 1514 participants, 46.5% identified as Latino, 21.4% Black, and 25.2 White. For Starting PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: "In-Person" (28.5%) which preferred in-person care and lab testing, and "Virtual" (71.5%) which preferred telehealth and at-home lab testing. For Continuing PrEP DCE, two latent classes were identified: "Pills" (23.6%) which preferred oral PrEP with low-cost options and "No Cost/Injectable" (76.4%) which strongly preferred no-costs and injectable PrEP. In multivariable models for Starting PrEP and for Continuing PrEP, latent class membership was significantly associated with a range of sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, housing instability, and provider and PrEP stigma.

Conclusions: The preferences identified for PrEP care in this diverse GBM sample indicate the need for multiple care and formulation choices including elimination of costs to improve PrEP uptake. DCE findings can guide implementation efforts to improve equitable access to PrEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS
AIDS 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
478
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
期刊最新文献
Impact of switching from efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide on psychiatric symptoms and neurocognition. Real-world clinical and economic outcomes from rapid start antiretroviral therapy in HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerging integrase resistance in an international perinatal virtual clinic. Bipolar disorder in people with HIV. Incidence of high blood pressure among Kenyan adults with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1