比较接受奥马达环素或万古霉素治疗的人粪便中胆汁酸和短链脂肪酸变化的I期试验。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1128/aac.01251-24
Jinhee Jo, Chenlin Hu, Thomas D Horvath, Sigmund J Haidacher, Khurshida Begum, M Jahangir Alam, Kevin W Garey
{"title":"比较接受奥马达环素或万古霉素治疗的人粪便中胆汁酸和短链脂肪酸变化的I期试验。","authors":"Jinhee Jo, Chenlin Hu, Thomas D Horvath, Sigmund J Haidacher, Khurshida Begum, M Jahangir Alam, Kevin W Garey","doi":"10.1128/aac.01251-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline tetracycline, has a low propensity to cause <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) in clinical trials. Omadacycline exhibited a reduced bactericidal effect compared with vancomycin on key microorganisms implicated in bile acid homeostasis and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), key components of CDI pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to assess bile acid and SCFA changes in stool samples from healthy volunteers given omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected daily from 16 healthy volunteers, who were given oral omadacycline or vancomycin for 10 days. Daily stool samples were assessed for bile acids and SCFA concentrations using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Bile acids changed significantly over time for all subjects (<i>P</i> < 0.01 for each bile acid), with vancomycin causing a larger change in the primary bile acids, cholic acid (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and chenodeoxycholic acid (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and a reduced change in the secondary bile acid, lithocholic acid (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid was reduced less by vancomycin than by omadacycline (<i>P</i> < 0.001). All SCFA concentrations were reduced from baseline with a larger effect observed with vancomycin for isobutyric acid (<i>P</i> = 0.0034), propionic acid (<i>P</i> = 0.0012), and acetic acid (<i>P</i> = 0.047). Microbial changes associated with the use of vancomycin versus omadacycline were also associated with changes in bile acid homeostasis and SCFA concentrations. Oral omadacycline produced a distinctive metabolomic profile compared with vancomycin when administered to healthy subjects. The metabolic findings help further our understanding of the lower CDI risk properties of omadacycline and warrant phase 2 investigations using omadacycline as a CDI antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess bile acid and SCFA changes in stool samples obtained from healthy volunteers given omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected daily from 16 healthy volunteers given a 10-day oral course of omadacycline or vancomycin. Vancomycin caused a larger change in the primary bile acids and SCFA concentrations compared with omadacycline. The metabolic findings help further our understanding of the mechanistic basis for the lower-risk properties of omadacycline causing CDI and warrant phase 2 investigations using omadacycline as a CDI antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials: </strong>This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06030219.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0125124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase I trial comparing bile acid and short-chain fatty acid alterations in stool collected from human subjects treated with omadacycline or vancomycin.\",\"authors\":\"Jinhee Jo, Chenlin Hu, Thomas D Horvath, Sigmund J Haidacher, Khurshida Begum, M Jahangir Alam, Kevin W Garey\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.01251-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline tetracycline, has a low propensity to cause <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) in clinical trials. Omadacycline exhibited a reduced bactericidal effect compared with vancomycin on key microorganisms implicated in bile acid homeostasis and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), key components of CDI pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to assess bile acid and SCFA changes in stool samples from healthy volunteers given omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected daily from 16 healthy volunteers, who were given oral omadacycline or vancomycin for 10 days. Daily stool samples were assessed for bile acids and SCFA concentrations using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Bile acids changed significantly over time for all subjects (<i>P</i> < 0.01 for each bile acid), with vancomycin causing a larger change in the primary bile acids, cholic acid (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and chenodeoxycholic acid (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and a reduced change in the secondary bile acid, lithocholic acid (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid was reduced less by vancomycin than by omadacycline (<i>P</i> < 0.001). All SCFA concentrations were reduced from baseline with a larger effect observed with vancomycin for isobutyric acid (<i>P</i> = 0.0034), propionic acid (<i>P</i> = 0.0012), and acetic acid (<i>P</i> = 0.047). Microbial changes associated with the use of vancomycin versus omadacycline were also associated with changes in bile acid homeostasis and SCFA concentrations. Oral omadacycline produced a distinctive metabolomic profile compared with vancomycin when administered to healthy subjects. The metabolic findings help further our understanding of the lower CDI risk properties of omadacycline and warrant phase 2 investigations using omadacycline as a CDI antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess bile acid and SCFA changes in stool samples obtained from healthy volunteers given omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected daily from 16 healthy volunteers given a 10-day oral course of omadacycline or vancomycin. Vancomycin caused a larger change in the primary bile acids and SCFA concentrations compared with omadacycline. The metabolic findings help further our understanding of the mechanistic basis for the lower-risk properties of omadacycline causing CDI and warrant phase 2 investigations using omadacycline as a CDI antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials: </strong>This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06030219.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0125124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01251-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01251-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥马达环素是一种氨基甲基四环素,在临床试验中引起艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的倾向较低。与万古霉素相比,奥马达环素对与胆汁酸稳态和短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)有关的关键微生物的杀菌作用降低,而这些微生物是CDI发病机制的关键成分。本研究的目的是评估服用奥马达环素或万古霉素的健康志愿者粪便样本中胆汁酸和SCFA的变化。每天收集16名健康志愿者的粪便样本,这些志愿者口服奥马达环素或万古霉素10天。使用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)评估每日粪便样本的胆汁酸和SCFA浓度。所有受试者的胆汁酸随时间变化显著(每种胆汁酸均P < 0.01),万古霉素引起初级胆汁酸、胆酸(P < 0.001)和鹅去氧胆酸(P < 0.001)的较大变化,而次级胆汁酸、石胆酸的变化减少(P < 0.001)。万古霉素降低二级胆汁酸熊去氧胆酸的作用小于奥马达环素(P < 0.001)。所有SCFA浓度均较基线降低,万古霉素对异丁酸(P = 0.0034)、丙酸(P = 0.0012)和乙酸(P = 0.047)的影响更大。与使用万古霉素和奥马达环素相关的微生物变化也与胆汁酸稳态和SCFA浓度的变化有关。与万古霉素相比,口服奥马达环素对健康受试者产生了独特的代谢组学特征。代谢方面的发现有助于我们进一步了解奥马达环素较低的CDI风险特性,并为使用奥马达环素作为CDI抗生素的2期研究提供了依据。重要性:本研究的目的是评估给予奥马达环素或万古霉素的健康志愿者粪便样本中胆汁酸和SCFA的变化。每天收集16名健康志愿者的粪便样本,这些志愿者给予为期10天的口服奥马达环素或万古霉素。与奥马达环素相比,万古霉素引起的初级胆汁酸和SCFA浓度变化更大。代谢方面的发现有助于我们进一步了解奥马达环素导致CDI的低风险特性的机制基础,并支持使用奥马达环素作为CDI抗生素的2期研究。临床试验:本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册为NCT06030219。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phase I trial comparing bile acid and short-chain fatty acid alterations in stool collected from human subjects treated with omadacycline or vancomycin.

Omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline tetracycline, has a low propensity to cause Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in clinical trials. Omadacycline exhibited a reduced bactericidal effect compared with vancomycin on key microorganisms implicated in bile acid homeostasis and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), key components of CDI pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to assess bile acid and SCFA changes in stool samples from healthy volunteers given omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected daily from 16 healthy volunteers, who were given oral omadacycline or vancomycin for 10 days. Daily stool samples were assessed for bile acids and SCFA concentrations using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Bile acids changed significantly over time for all subjects (P < 0.01 for each bile acid), with vancomycin causing a larger change in the primary bile acids, cholic acid (P < 0.001) and chenodeoxycholic acid (P < 0.001), and a reduced change in the secondary bile acid, lithocholic acid (P < 0.001). The secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid was reduced less by vancomycin than by omadacycline (P < 0.001). All SCFA concentrations were reduced from baseline with a larger effect observed with vancomycin for isobutyric acid (P = 0.0034), propionic acid (P = 0.0012), and acetic acid (P = 0.047). Microbial changes associated with the use of vancomycin versus omadacycline were also associated with changes in bile acid homeostasis and SCFA concentrations. Oral omadacycline produced a distinctive metabolomic profile compared with vancomycin when administered to healthy subjects. The metabolic findings help further our understanding of the lower CDI risk properties of omadacycline and warrant phase 2 investigations using omadacycline as a CDI antibiotic.

Importance: The purpose of this study was to assess bile acid and SCFA changes in stool samples obtained from healthy volunteers given omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected daily from 16 healthy volunteers given a 10-day oral course of omadacycline or vancomycin. Vancomycin caused a larger change in the primary bile acids and SCFA concentrations compared with omadacycline. The metabolic findings help further our understanding of the mechanistic basis for the lower-risk properties of omadacycline causing CDI and warrant phase 2 investigations using omadacycline as a CDI antibiotic.

Clinical trials: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06030219.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Deciphering meropenem persistence in Acinetobacter baumannii facilitates discovery of anti-persister activity of thymol. Efficacy, safety, and anti-inflammatory properties of the switch to a doravirine-based regimen among antiretroviral-experienced elderly people living with HIV-1: the DORAGE cohort. Efficient in vitro assay for evaluating drug efficacy and synergy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains. Single-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetics of leritrelvir in Chinese patients with hepatic impairment and healthy matched controls. TAC1b mutation in Candida auris decreases manogepix susceptibility owing to increased CDR1 expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1