临床试验中以患者为中心的放射治疗的最佳实践和超越国家多学科共识。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.103732
H Green, R Rieu, F Slevin, L Ashmore, H Bulbeck, P Gkogkou, S Ingram, C Kelly, H Probst, R Shakir, T Underwood, J Wolfarth, M J Merchant, N G Burnet
{"title":"临床试验中以患者为中心的放射治疗的最佳实践和超越国家多学科共识。","authors":"H Green, R Rieu, F Slevin, L Ashmore, H Bulbeck, P Gkogkou, S Ingram, C Kelly, H Probst, R Shakir, T Underwood, J Wolfarth, M J Merchant, N G Burnet","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.103732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patient-centred radiotherapy refers to an approach where patients' needs and preferences are prioritised. Guidelines for this personalised approach are lacking. We present a multidisciplinary national consensus with the aim to provide recommendations for best practice in patient-centred radiotherapy for both clinical trials and routine practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary working group was formed, comprising of healthcare professionals and patient advocates with lived experience of radiotherapy. Three interlinking themes were identified around patient-centred radiotherapy: information, decision-making, and outcomes. Scoping reviews were carried out for each theme, considering current challenges and recommendations for best practice. Recommendations were shaped through consultation with 12 patient advocates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a pressing need to better support patients prior to, during, and following radiotherapy. Radiotherapy-related patient information is often complex and challenging to understand. Information resources should be cocreated with patient advocates and individualised wherever possible, including for patients from under-served groups. Shared decision-making (SDM) processes may enhance treatment satisfaction and reduce decision-regret, but these are not widely implemented. SDM requires prepared patients, trained teams, alongside adequate resources and should be offered as per patients' preferences. Healthcare system data offer complementary information to clinical trials, with the potential to provide additional insight into long-term benefits and risks of radiotherapy within 'real-world' conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures may provide greater insight regarding toxicity and impact on quality of life and should be used in synergy with clinician-reported outcomes. Outcome measures should be collected in the long term, and results should be widely disseminated to both the public and professional communities. Equity of access to radiotherapy, clinical trials, and survivorship services is a priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients rightly expect more from healthcare professionals, and it is important that the radiotherapy community recognises this and embraces changes which will enhance patient-centred care. Our recommendations aim to guide best practice for patient-centred radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"39 ","pages":"103732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practice for Patient-centred Radiotherapy in Clinical Trials and Beyond-A National Multidisciplinary Consensus.\",\"authors\":\"H Green, R Rieu, F Slevin, L Ashmore, H Bulbeck, P Gkogkou, S Ingram, C Kelly, H Probst, R Shakir, T Underwood, J Wolfarth, M J Merchant, N G Burnet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clon.2024.103732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patient-centred radiotherapy refers to an approach where patients' needs and preferences are prioritised. Guidelines for this personalised approach are lacking. We present a multidisciplinary national consensus with the aim to provide recommendations for best practice in patient-centred radiotherapy for both clinical trials and routine practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary working group was formed, comprising of healthcare professionals and patient advocates with lived experience of radiotherapy. Three interlinking themes were identified around patient-centred radiotherapy: information, decision-making, and outcomes. Scoping reviews were carried out for each theme, considering current challenges and recommendations for best practice. Recommendations were shaped through consultation with 12 patient advocates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a pressing need to better support patients prior to, during, and following radiotherapy. Radiotherapy-related patient information is often complex and challenging to understand. Information resources should be cocreated with patient advocates and individualised wherever possible, including for patients from under-served groups. Shared decision-making (SDM) processes may enhance treatment satisfaction and reduce decision-regret, but these are not widely implemented. SDM requires prepared patients, trained teams, alongside adequate resources and should be offered as per patients' preferences. Healthcare system data offer complementary information to clinical trials, with the potential to provide additional insight into long-term benefits and risks of radiotherapy within 'real-world' conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures may provide greater insight regarding toxicity and impact on quality of life and should be used in synergy with clinician-reported outcomes. Outcome measures should be collected in the long term, and results should be widely disseminated to both the public and professional communities. Equity of access to radiotherapy, clinical trials, and survivorship services is a priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients rightly expect more from healthcare professionals, and it is important that the radiotherapy community recognises this and embraces changes which will enhance patient-centred care. Our recommendations aim to guide best practice for patient-centred radiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"103732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.103732\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.103732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以患者为中心的放疗是指一种以患者的需要和偏好为优先考虑的方法。目前缺乏针对这种个性化方法的指导方针。我们提出了一个多学科的国家共识,旨在为临床试验和常规实践提供以患者为中心的放射治疗的最佳实践建议。材料和方法:成立了一个多学科工作组,由具有放射治疗生活经验的保健专业人员和患者倡导者组成。围绕以患者为中心的放射治疗确定了三个相互关联的主题:信息、决策和结果。对每个主题进行了范围审查,考虑了当前的挑战和最佳做法的建议。建议是通过与12名患者倡导者协商形成的。结果:迫切需要在放疗前、放疗中和放疗后更好地支持患者。放疗相关的患者信息通常是复杂的,难以理解。信息资源应与患者倡导者共同创建,并尽可能个性化,包括针对服务不足群体的患者。共享决策(SDM)过程可以提高治疗满意度和减少决策后悔,但这些并没有广泛实施。SDM需要有准备的患者,训练有素的团队,以及充足的资源,并应根据患者的喜好提供。医疗保健系统数据为临床试验提供了补充信息,有可能为“现实世界”条件下放射治疗的长期益处和风险提供额外的见解。患者报告的结果测量可以更深入地了解毒性和对生活质量的影响,并应与临床报告的结果协同使用。应长期收集结果措施,并应将结果广泛传播给公众和专业团体。获得放射治疗、临床试验和生存服务的公平是一个优先事项。结论:患者对医疗保健专业人员的期望是正确的,放疗界认识到这一点并接受将加强以患者为中心的护理的变化是很重要的。我们的建议旨在指导以患者为中心的放射治疗的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Best Practice for Patient-centred Radiotherapy in Clinical Trials and Beyond-A National Multidisciplinary Consensus.

Aims: Patient-centred radiotherapy refers to an approach where patients' needs and preferences are prioritised. Guidelines for this personalised approach are lacking. We present a multidisciplinary national consensus with the aim to provide recommendations for best practice in patient-centred radiotherapy for both clinical trials and routine practice.

Materials and methods: A multidisciplinary working group was formed, comprising of healthcare professionals and patient advocates with lived experience of radiotherapy. Three interlinking themes were identified around patient-centred radiotherapy: information, decision-making, and outcomes. Scoping reviews were carried out for each theme, considering current challenges and recommendations for best practice. Recommendations were shaped through consultation with 12 patient advocates.

Results: There is a pressing need to better support patients prior to, during, and following radiotherapy. Radiotherapy-related patient information is often complex and challenging to understand. Information resources should be cocreated with patient advocates and individualised wherever possible, including for patients from under-served groups. Shared decision-making (SDM) processes may enhance treatment satisfaction and reduce decision-regret, but these are not widely implemented. SDM requires prepared patients, trained teams, alongside adequate resources and should be offered as per patients' preferences. Healthcare system data offer complementary information to clinical trials, with the potential to provide additional insight into long-term benefits and risks of radiotherapy within 'real-world' conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures may provide greater insight regarding toxicity and impact on quality of life and should be used in synergy with clinician-reported outcomes. Outcome measures should be collected in the long term, and results should be widely disseminated to both the public and professional communities. Equity of access to radiotherapy, clinical trials, and survivorship services is a priority.

Conclusion: Patients rightly expect more from healthcare professionals, and it is important that the radiotherapy community recognises this and embraces changes which will enhance patient-centred care. Our recommendations aim to guide best practice for patient-centred radiotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Under-representation for Female Pelvis Cancers in Commercial Auto-segmentation Solutions and Open-source Imaging Datasets. Correspondence to the Editor: Reirradiation in Paediatric Tumors of the Central Nervous System: Outcome and Side Effects After Implementing National Guidelines. Comparing the Robustness of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy and Proton-arc Therapy Against Interplay Effects of 4D Robust-optimised Plans for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. OncoFlash: Research Updates in a Flash! REMIT: Reirradiation of Diffuse Midline Glioma Patients -A Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Feasibility Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1