上游大剂量替罗非班对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期疗效。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Coronary artery disease Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001501
Amr E I Abouelnour, Eman Q Mohammed, Doaa A Fouad, Aly Tohamy
{"title":"上游大剂量替罗非班对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期疗效。","authors":"Amr E I Abouelnour, Eman Q Mohammed, Doaa A Fouad, Aly Tohamy","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is challenging to treat.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upstream high-bolus-dose tirofiban administration in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases undergoing PPCI on top of dual antiplatelet therapy, including ticagrelor, in comparison to selective bailout administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This hospital-based, randomized, single-blinded prospective interventional study was conducted on 150 patients at Assiut University Heart Hospital. Patients with STEMI within 12 h after symptom onset who underwent PPCI were randomized to an upstream group (n = 75) and a selective bailout group (n = 75) based on the timing of the tirofiban bolus administration (25 µg/kg intravenously over 5 min).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bailout group's thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count was higher than the upstream group's, despite comparable TIMI flow and myocardial blush grade between the two groups, but only approached statistical significance [14.4 (4-36) vs 12.2 (5-55), P = 0.08]. The enzymatic infarct size tended to be lower in the upstream group. All echocardiographic findings were comparable between the two studied groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to selective bailout administration, upstream high bolus dose of tirofiban in STEMI patients undergoing primary coronary intervention did not significantly affect angiographic outcomes, left ventricular remodeling, or function, despite smaller infarction size.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term effects of upstream high bolus dose of tirofiban in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Amr E I Abouelnour, Eman Q Mohammed, Doaa A Fouad, Aly Tohamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is challenging to treat.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upstream high-bolus-dose tirofiban administration in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases undergoing PPCI on top of dual antiplatelet therapy, including ticagrelor, in comparison to selective bailout administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This hospital-based, randomized, single-blinded prospective interventional study was conducted on 150 patients at Assiut University Heart Hospital. Patients with STEMI within 12 h after symptom onset who underwent PPCI were randomized to an upstream group (n = 75) and a selective bailout group (n = 75) based on the timing of the tirofiban bolus administration (25 µg/kg intravenously over 5 min).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bailout group's thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count was higher than the upstream group's, despite comparable TIMI flow and myocardial blush grade between the two groups, but only approached statistical significance [14.4 (4-36) vs 12.2 (5-55), P = 0.08]. The enzymatic infarct size tended to be lower in the upstream group. All echocardiographic findings were comparable between the two studied groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to selective bailout administration, upstream high bolus dose of tirofiban in STEMI patients undergoing primary coronary intervention did not significantly affect angiographic outcomes, left ventricular remodeling, or function, despite smaller infarction size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001501\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)后无再流治疗具有挑战性。目的:本研究的目的是评估st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在接受PPCI的双重抗血小板治疗(包括替格瑞洛)的基础上上游大剂量替罗非班给药的有效性和安全性,并与选择性救助给药进行比较。方法:这项以医院为基础的、随机的、单盲的前瞻性介入研究对Assiut大学心脏医院的150例患者进行了研究。在症状出现后12小时内接受PPCI治疗的STEMI患者根据替罗非班给药时间(静脉注射25µg/kg,超过5分钟)随机分为上游组(n = 75)和选择性救助组(n = 75)。结果:救助组心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)帧数高于上游组,尽管两组间TIMI流量和心肌红度相当,但仅接近统计学意义[14.4 (4-36)vs 12.2 (5-55), P = 0.08]。上游组酶促梗死面积较小。两组超声心动图结果均具有可比性,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组临床结果无显著差异。结论:与选择性救助给药相比,上游大剂量替罗非班对接受初级冠状动脉介入治疗的STEMI患者没有显著影响血管造影结果、左心室重构或功能,尽管梗死面积较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Short-term effects of upstream high bolus dose of tirofiban in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: No-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is challenging to treat.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upstream high-bolus-dose tirofiban administration in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases undergoing PPCI on top of dual antiplatelet therapy, including ticagrelor, in comparison to selective bailout administration.

Methods: This hospital-based, randomized, single-blinded prospective interventional study was conducted on 150 patients at Assiut University Heart Hospital. Patients with STEMI within 12 h after symptom onset who underwent PPCI were randomized to an upstream group (n = 75) and a selective bailout group (n = 75) based on the timing of the tirofiban bolus administration (25 µg/kg intravenously over 5 min).

Results: The bailout group's thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count was higher than the upstream group's, despite comparable TIMI flow and myocardial blush grade between the two groups, but only approached statistical significance [14.4 (4-36) vs 12.2 (5-55), P = 0.08]. The enzymatic infarct size tended to be lower in the upstream group. All echocardiographic findings were comparable between the two studied groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: Compared to selective bailout administration, upstream high bolus dose of tirofiban in STEMI patients undergoing primary coronary intervention did not significantly affect angiographic outcomes, left ventricular remodeling, or function, despite smaller infarction size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
期刊最新文献
Circulation of natural autoantibodies against an immunodominant region of the apolipoprotein B after an acute coronary syndrome: a prospective observational study. Coronary artery aneurysm of ambiguous origin at the left main bifurcation: a rare conundrum. Split right coronary artery: a rare coronary artery anomaly. Observance of rare congenital anomaly: dual right coronary artery. Impact of the fibrosis-4 index in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1