顺序吞咽训练方案对早产儿进食过渡和吸吮-吞咽-呼吸协调的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106193
Guoqiang Ren , Lina Fan , Yanni Chen , Haihong Lei , Wenhua Wu , Ying Ma , Yanxia Huang
{"title":"顺序吞咽训练方案对早产儿进食过渡和吸吮-吞咽-呼吸协调的影响。","authors":"Guoqiang Ren ,&nbsp;Lina Fan ,&nbsp;Yanni Chen ,&nbsp;Haihong Lei ,&nbsp;Wenhua Wu ,&nbsp;Ying Ma ,&nbsp;Yanxia Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To retrospectively evaluate the effect of a sequential swallow training programme (SSTP) consisting of nonnutritive sucking (NNS), modified feeding posture, oral sensory-motor intervention and breath exercise on the independent oral feeding transition and coordination of suck-swallow-breath (SSB) functions in preterm infants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty preterm infants received SSTP intervention and sixty infants receiving NNS were set as control. The feeding performance and SSB coordination were assessed using POFRAS and NOMAS scales.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The transition interval were 8.42 ± 4.49 and 10.27 ± 5.05 days for SSTP and NNS group, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.022). SSTP group had substantially more weight gains and shorter in-hospital stay than NNS. Two groups had comparable POFRAS and NOMAS scores before interventions, which were significantly increased after treatments in the two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). SSTP groups exhibited higher POFRAS scores, and better NOMAS performance reflected by the movement and coordination of jaw and tongue, especially in the normal sucking domain than the NNS group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Both interventions significantly reduced the episodes of desaturation, apnea, and bradycardia, while no priority was shown for SSTP comparing with NNS. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that SSTP intervention was independently associated with decreased full oral feeding transition days, more weight gain during intervention and higher POFRAS score after intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SSTP intervention shorten the transition days to full oral feeding and efficiently improved oral movement and coordination of SSB pattern when feeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 106193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sequential swallow training programme on feeding transition and suck-swallow-breath coordination in preterm infants\",\"authors\":\"Guoqiang Ren ,&nbsp;Lina Fan ,&nbsp;Yanni Chen ,&nbsp;Haihong Lei ,&nbsp;Wenhua Wu ,&nbsp;Ying Ma ,&nbsp;Yanxia Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To retrospectively evaluate the effect of a sequential swallow training programme (SSTP) consisting of nonnutritive sucking (NNS), modified feeding posture, oral sensory-motor intervention and breath exercise on the independent oral feeding transition and coordination of suck-swallow-breath (SSB) functions in preterm infants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty preterm infants received SSTP intervention and sixty infants receiving NNS were set as control. The feeding performance and SSB coordination were assessed using POFRAS and NOMAS scales.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The transition interval were 8.42 ± 4.49 and 10.27 ± 5.05 days for SSTP and NNS group, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.022). SSTP group had substantially more weight gains and shorter in-hospital stay than NNS. Two groups had comparable POFRAS and NOMAS scores before interventions, which were significantly increased after treatments in the two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). SSTP groups exhibited higher POFRAS scores, and better NOMAS performance reflected by the movement and coordination of jaw and tongue, especially in the normal sucking domain than the NNS group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Both interventions significantly reduced the episodes of desaturation, apnea, and bradycardia, while no priority was shown for SSTP comparing with NNS. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that SSTP intervention was independently associated with decreased full oral feeding transition days, more weight gain during intervention and higher POFRAS score after intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SSTP intervention shorten the transition days to full oral feeding and efficiently improved oral movement and coordination of SSB pattern when feeding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early human development\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early human development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378225000039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378225000039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾性评价由非营养性吸吮(NNS)、改良喂养姿势、口腔感觉运动干预和呼吸练习组成的顺序吞咽训练计划(SSTP)对早产儿独立口腔喂养过渡和吸吮-吞咽-呼吸(SSB)功能协调的影响。方法:60例接受SSTP干预的早产儿和60例接受NNS干预的早产儿作为对照。采用POFRAS和NOMAS量表评估摄食性能和SSB协调性。结果:SSTP组和NNS组的转换时间分别为8.42±4.49和10.27±5.05 d (P = 0.022)。与NNS组相比,SSTP组体重增加更多,住院时间更短。两组干预前POFRAS和NOMAS评分相当,治疗后两组POFRAS和NOMAS评分显著升高(P结论:SSTP干预缩短了向全口喂养过渡的时间,有效改善了喂养时口腔运动和SSB模式的协调性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of sequential swallow training programme on feeding transition and suck-swallow-breath coordination in preterm infants

Aims

To retrospectively evaluate the effect of a sequential swallow training programme (SSTP) consisting of nonnutritive sucking (NNS), modified feeding posture, oral sensory-motor intervention and breath exercise on the independent oral feeding transition and coordination of suck-swallow-breath (SSB) functions in preterm infants.

Methods

Sixty preterm infants received SSTP intervention and sixty infants receiving NNS were set as control. The feeding performance and SSB coordination were assessed using POFRAS and NOMAS scales.

Results

The transition interval were 8.42 ± 4.49 and 10.27 ± 5.05 days for SSTP and NNS group, respectively (P = 0.022). SSTP group had substantially more weight gains and shorter in-hospital stay than NNS. Two groups had comparable POFRAS and NOMAS scores before interventions, which were significantly increased after treatments in the two groups (P < 0.05). SSTP groups exhibited higher POFRAS scores, and better NOMAS performance reflected by the movement and coordination of jaw and tongue, especially in the normal sucking domain than the NNS group (P < 0.05). Both interventions significantly reduced the episodes of desaturation, apnea, and bradycardia, while no priority was shown for SSTP comparing with NNS. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that SSTP intervention was independently associated with decreased full oral feeding transition days, more weight gain during intervention and higher POFRAS score after intervention.

Conclusion

SSTP intervention shorten the transition days to full oral feeding and efficiently improved oral movement and coordination of SSB pattern when feeding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac function and neurological development in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: Current evidence and clinical implications Worldwide prevalence and disability from preterm-associated developmental intellectual disability during childhood and adolescence Lending a helping hand to preterm infants: Randomized controlled trial of the impact of ‘sticky mittens’ on exploratory behavior and later development Extra-uterine placental transfusion and intact-cord stabilisation of moderately preterm to term infants in caesarean deliveries - A feasibility study with historical control (INTACT-2) Clinical validation of an abridged AIMS: Streamlining motor screening in the first-year infant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1