Nahal Khoshdel, Melina Noursalehigarakani, Zahra Sadat Seghatoleslami, Fahimeh Hadavand, Elaheh Eghbal, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Elena Simula, Parnian Ahmed, Leonardo Antonio Sechi
{"title":"头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗革兰氏阴性感染的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nahal Khoshdel, Melina Noursalehigarakani, Zahra Sadat Seghatoleslami, Fahimeh Hadavand, Elaheh Eghbal, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Elena Simula, Parnian Ahmed, Leonardo Antonio Sechi","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05044-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has emerged as a promising treatment option for Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by CAZ-Non-Susceptible (NS) pathogens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in these challenging infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically queried EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PubMed/Medline for studies published until September 15, 2024. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating CAZ-AVI against Gram-negative infections were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for both clinical and microbiological success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 studies were identified through database searches, leading to the inclusion of 17 studies. Among the efficacy studies for Gram-negative pathogens, there was no significant difference in clinical success rates for CAZ-AVI compared to comparators (pooled OR: 0.90, p = 0.22), and a non-significant increase in microbiological success was observed (pooled OR: 1.20, p = 0.41). In contrast, for CAZ-NS pathogens, six studies reported no significant difference in clinical cure rates (pooled OR: 0.77, p = 0.24), while four studies indicated a non-significant increase in microbiological cure rates (pooled OR: 1.83, p < 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that CAZ-AVI is a viable option for treating Gram-negative infections, including CAZ-NS pathogens. While it has shown promising activity against these resistant pathogens, its clinical and microbiological success rates are comparable to other antibiotics in the overall analysis. However, CAZ-AVI may offer an advantage in managing resistant infections. These findings underscore the need to consider CAZ-AVI in treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship programs to optimize its use and prevent resistance. Ongoing monitoring of resistance patterns and patient outcomes is essential to ensure its long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nahal Khoshdel, Melina Noursalehigarakani, Zahra Sadat Seghatoleslami, Fahimeh Hadavand, Elaheh Eghbal, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Elena Simula, Parnian Ahmed, Leonardo Antonio Sechi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10096-025-05044-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has emerged as a promising treatment option for Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by CAZ-Non-Susceptible (NS) pathogens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in these challenging infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically queried EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PubMed/Medline for studies published until September 15, 2024. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating CAZ-AVI against Gram-negative infections were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for both clinical and microbiological success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 studies were identified through database searches, leading to the inclusion of 17 studies. Among the efficacy studies for Gram-negative pathogens, there was no significant difference in clinical success rates for CAZ-AVI compared to comparators (pooled OR: 0.90, p = 0.22), and a non-significant increase in microbiological success was observed (pooled OR: 1.20, p = 0.41). In contrast, for CAZ-NS pathogens, six studies reported no significant difference in clinical cure rates (pooled OR: 0.77, p = 0.24), while four studies indicated a non-significant increase in microbiological cure rates (pooled OR: 1.83, p < 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that CAZ-AVI is a viable option for treating Gram-negative infections, including CAZ-NS pathogens. While it has shown promising activity against these resistant pathogens, its clinical and microbiological success rates are comparable to other antibiotics in the overall analysis. However, CAZ-AVI may offer an advantage in managing resistant infections. These findings underscore the need to consider CAZ-AVI in treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship programs to optimize its use and prevent resistance. Ongoing monitoring of resistance patterns and patient outcomes is essential to ensure its long-term efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05044-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05044-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)已成为革兰氏阴性感染的一种有希望的治疗选择,特别是那些由caz -非敏感(NS)病原体引起的感染。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估CAZ-AVI治疗这些挑战性感染的有效性和安全性。方法:系统查询EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL和PubMed/Medline,查询截止到2024年9月15日发表的研究。纳入评价CAZ-AVI抗革兰氏阴性感染的随机对照试验(RCTs)。进行荟萃分析以计算临床和微生物学成功的合并优势比(OR)。结果:通过数据库检索共发现146项研究,纳入17项研究。在革兰氏阴性病原体的疗效研究中,CAZ-AVI的临床成功率与比较物相比无显著差异(合并OR: 0.90, p = 0.22),微生物成功率无显著增加(合并OR: 1.20, p = 0.41)。相比之下,对于CAZ-NS病原体,6项研究报告临床治愈率无显著差异(合并OR: 0.77, p = 0.24),而4项研究报告微生物治愈率无显著增加(合并OR: 1.83, p)。结论:本研究表明CAZ-AVI是治疗革兰氏阴性感染的可行选择,包括CAZ-NS病原体。虽然它对这些耐药病原体显示出有希望的活性,但在总体分析中,其临床和微生物学成功率与其他抗生素相当。然而,CAZ-AVI可能在管理耐药感染方面具有优势。这些发现强调了在治疗指南中考虑CAZ-AVI的必要性,并强调了抗生素管理计划对优化其使用和预防耐药性的重要性。持续监测耐药模式和患者预后对于确保其长期疗效至关重要。
Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has emerged as a promising treatment option for Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by CAZ-Non-Susceptible (NS) pathogens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in these challenging infections.
Methods: We systematically queried EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PubMed/Medline for studies published until September 15, 2024. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating CAZ-AVI against Gram-negative infections were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for both clinical and microbiological success.
Results: A total of 146 studies were identified through database searches, leading to the inclusion of 17 studies. Among the efficacy studies for Gram-negative pathogens, there was no significant difference in clinical success rates for CAZ-AVI compared to comparators (pooled OR: 0.90, p = 0.22), and a non-significant increase in microbiological success was observed (pooled OR: 1.20, p = 0.41). In contrast, for CAZ-NS pathogens, six studies reported no significant difference in clinical cure rates (pooled OR: 0.77, p = 0.24), while four studies indicated a non-significant increase in microbiological cure rates (pooled OR: 1.83, p < 0.02).
Conclusions: This study suggests that CAZ-AVI is a viable option for treating Gram-negative infections, including CAZ-NS pathogens. While it has shown promising activity against these resistant pathogens, its clinical and microbiological success rates are comparable to other antibiotics in the overall analysis. However, CAZ-AVI may offer an advantage in managing resistant infections. These findings underscore the need to consider CAZ-AVI in treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship programs to optimize its use and prevent resistance. Ongoing monitoring of resistance patterns and patient outcomes is essential to ensure its long-term efficacy.
期刊介绍:
EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.