秘鲁一所私立大学卫生科学本科生科学生产力的制约因素:一项横断面分析研究。

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.143021.2
César Antonio Bonilla-Asalde, Isabel Cristina Rivera-Lozada, Oriana Rivera-Lozada
{"title":"秘鲁一所私立大学卫生科学本科生科学生产力的制约因素:一项横断面分析研究。","authors":"César Antonio Bonilla-Asalde, Isabel Cristina Rivera-Lozada, Oriana Rivera-Lozada","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.143021.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the conditioning factors for scientific research productivity in university students of health sciences.Scientific productivity, in addition to making visible the generation of new knowledge, contributes to the well-being of the population and provides feedback to the scientific community in terms of methodologies, perspectives and results that help to break down barriers that delimit productivity in scientific research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted. The study population was 4104 students enrolled during the 2021-I semester in the Faculty of Health Sciences of a private Peruvian university. A sample size of 400 students was determined and a stratified probability sampling was used. The variables were measured through surveys. The dependent variable was scientific research productivity, and the independent variables were institutional culture, knowledge management and technological capital. Summary measures are reported according to the type of variable. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was applied to assess the association between the variables of interest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Stepwise method. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the total of 400 students, 74.5% were male, 57.25% were aged between 18 and 27 years, 17% belonged to the school of human medicine and 72% were in their sixth year of studies. Scientific research productivity was associated with management commitment (PR=1.493; 95%CI: 1.077-2.068, p=0.015), sense of personal growth (PR=1.632; 95%CI: 1.041-2.558; p=0.024), recognition by the university (PR=1.385; 95%CI: 1.012-1.896; p=0.043), strategic alliances (PR=1.422; 95%CI: 1.032-1.959; p=0. 03), having research proposals (PR=1.522; 95%CI: 1.114-2.08; p=0.009), dissemination of results obtained (PR=1.542; 95%CI: 1.12-2.122; p=0.01), availability of human resources (PR=1.591; 95%CI: 1.165-2.173; p=0.004), access to equipment and software (PR=1.482; 95%CI: 1.061-2.069; p=0.018) and to laboratories (PR=1.438; 95%CI: 1.047-1.974; p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is concluded that the research productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences is low. It is imperative to strengthen the university research culture that empowers students as agents of change and strengthens faculty participation in scientific networks and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conditioning factors for the scientific productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences at a private Peruvian University: A cross-sectional analytical study.\",\"authors\":\"César Antonio Bonilla-Asalde, Isabel Cristina Rivera-Lozada, Oriana Rivera-Lozada\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.143021.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the conditioning factors for scientific research productivity in university students of health sciences.Scientific productivity, in addition to making visible the generation of new knowledge, contributes to the well-being of the population and provides feedback to the scientific community in terms of methodologies, perspectives and results that help to break down barriers that delimit productivity in scientific research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted. The study population was 4104 students enrolled during the 2021-I semester in the Faculty of Health Sciences of a private Peruvian university. A sample size of 400 students was determined and a stratified probability sampling was used. The variables were measured through surveys. The dependent variable was scientific research productivity, and the independent variables were institutional culture, knowledge management and technological capital. Summary measures are reported according to the type of variable. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was applied to assess the association between the variables of interest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Stepwise method. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the total of 400 students, 74.5% were male, 57.25% were aged between 18 and 27 years, 17% belonged to the school of human medicine and 72% were in their sixth year of studies. Scientific research productivity was associated with management commitment (PR=1.493; 95%CI: 1.077-2.068, p=0.015), sense of personal growth (PR=1.632; 95%CI: 1.041-2.558; p=0.024), recognition by the university (PR=1.385; 95%CI: 1.012-1.896; p=0.043), strategic alliances (PR=1.422; 95%CI: 1.032-1.959; p=0. 03), having research proposals (PR=1.522; 95%CI: 1.114-2.08; p=0.009), dissemination of results obtained (PR=1.542; 95%CI: 1.12-2.122; p=0.01), availability of human resources (PR=1.591; 95%CI: 1.165-2.173; p=0.004), access to equipment and software (PR=1.482; 95%CI: 1.061-2.069; p=0.018) and to laboratories (PR=1.438; 95%CI: 1.047-1.974; p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is concluded that the research productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences is low. It is imperative to strengthen the university research culture that empowers students as agents of change and strengthens faculty participation in scientific networks and communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143021.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143021.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨健康科学专业大学生科研生产力的影响因素。科学生产力除了使人们看到新知识的产生之外,还有助于人民的福祉,并在方法、观点和结果方面向科学界提供反馈,这些反馈有助于打破限制科学研究生产力的障碍。方法:采用横断面分析观察研究。研究对象为秘鲁一所私立大学健康科学学院2021- 1学期入学的4104名学生。样本量为400名学生,采用分层概率抽样。这些变量是通过调查来测量的。因变量为科研生产率,自变量为制度文化、知识管理和技术资本。根据变量的类型报告汇总度量。卡方检验结果具有显著性水平:400名学生中,男性占74.5%,年龄在18 - 27岁之间的占57.25%,人类医学学院学生占17%,六年级学生占72%。科研生产力与管理承诺相关(PR=1.493;95%CI: 1.077 ~ 2.068, p=0.015)、个人成长意识(PR=1.632;95%置信区间:1.041—-2.558;p=0.024),大学认可度(PR=1.385;95%置信区间:1.012—-1.896;p=0.043),战略联盟(PR=1.422;95%置信区间:1.032—-1.959;p = 0。03),有研究计划(PR=1.522;95%置信区间:1.114—-2.08;p=0.009),结果的传播(PR=1.542;95%置信区间:1.12—-2.122;p=0.01)、人力资源可获得性(PR=1.591;95%置信区间:1.165—-2.173;p=0.004),获取设备和软件(PR=1.482;95%置信区间:1.061—-2.069;p=0.018)和实验室(PR=1.438;95%置信区间:1.047—-1.974;p = 0.024)。结论:卫生科学本科学生科研生产力较低。当务之急是加强大学的研究文化,使学生成为变革的推动者,并加强教师对科学网络和社区的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conditioning factors for the scientific productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences at a private Peruvian University: A cross-sectional analytical study.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the conditioning factors for scientific research productivity in university students of health sciences.Scientific productivity, in addition to making visible the generation of new knowledge, contributes to the well-being of the population and provides feedback to the scientific community in terms of methodologies, perspectives and results that help to break down barriers that delimit productivity in scientific research.

Methods: A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted. The study population was 4104 students enrolled during the 2021-I semester in the Faculty of Health Sciences of a private Peruvian university. A sample size of 400 students was determined and a stratified probability sampling was used. The variables were measured through surveys. The dependent variable was scientific research productivity, and the independent variables were institutional culture, knowledge management and technological capital. Summary measures are reported according to the type of variable. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was applied to assess the association between the variables of interest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Stepwise method. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.

Results: From the total of 400 students, 74.5% were male, 57.25% were aged between 18 and 27 years, 17% belonged to the school of human medicine and 72% were in their sixth year of studies. Scientific research productivity was associated with management commitment (PR=1.493; 95%CI: 1.077-2.068, p=0.015), sense of personal growth (PR=1.632; 95%CI: 1.041-2.558; p=0.024), recognition by the university (PR=1.385; 95%CI: 1.012-1.896; p=0.043), strategic alliances (PR=1.422; 95%CI: 1.032-1.959; p=0. 03), having research proposals (PR=1.522; 95%CI: 1.114-2.08; p=0.009), dissemination of results obtained (PR=1.542; 95%CI: 1.12-2.122; p=0.01), availability of human resources (PR=1.591; 95%CI: 1.165-2.173; p=0.004), access to equipment and software (PR=1.482; 95%CI: 1.061-2.069; p=0.018) and to laboratories (PR=1.438; 95%CI: 1.047-1.974; p=0.024).

Conclusion: It is concluded that the research productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences is low. It is imperative to strengthen the university research culture that empowers students as agents of change and strengthens faculty participation in scientific networks and communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
期刊最新文献
Biological properties of Moringa oleifera: A systematic review of the last decade. Experiences Using Media Health Claims to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Healthcare Students: A Mixed Methods Study. Impact of distress and anxiety due to COVID-19 on digital addictions in university students in the third wave period . A reference genome for the eastern bettong ( Bettongia gaimardi). Hormonal Influences on ADC Values in Breast Tissues: A Scoping Review of DWI in Pre- and Post-menopausal Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1