César Antonio Bonilla-Asalde, Isabel Cristina Rivera-Lozada, Oriana Rivera-Lozada
{"title":"秘鲁一所私立大学卫生科学本科生科学生产力的制约因素:一项横断面分析研究。","authors":"César Antonio Bonilla-Asalde, Isabel Cristina Rivera-Lozada, Oriana Rivera-Lozada","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.143021.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the conditioning factors for scientific research productivity in university students of health sciences.Scientific productivity, in addition to making visible the generation of new knowledge, contributes to the well-being of the population and provides feedback to the scientific community in terms of methodologies, perspectives and results that help to break down barriers that delimit productivity in scientific research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted. The study population was 4104 students enrolled during the 2021-I semester in the Faculty of Health Sciences of a private Peruvian university. A sample size of 400 students was determined and a stratified probability sampling was used. The variables were measured through surveys. The dependent variable was scientific research productivity, and the independent variables were institutional culture, knowledge management and technological capital. Summary measures are reported according to the type of variable. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was applied to assess the association between the variables of interest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Stepwise method. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the total of 400 students, 74.5% were male, 57.25% were aged between 18 and 27 years, 17% belonged to the school of human medicine and 72% were in their sixth year of studies. Scientific research productivity was associated with management commitment (PR=1.493; 95%CI: 1.077-2.068, p=0.015), sense of personal growth (PR=1.632; 95%CI: 1.041-2.558; p=0.024), recognition by the university (PR=1.385; 95%CI: 1.012-1.896; p=0.043), strategic alliances (PR=1.422; 95%CI: 1.032-1.959; p=0. 03), having research proposals (PR=1.522; 95%CI: 1.114-2.08; p=0.009), dissemination of results obtained (PR=1.542; 95%CI: 1.12-2.122; p=0.01), availability of human resources (PR=1.591; 95%CI: 1.165-2.173; p=0.004), access to equipment and software (PR=1.482; 95%CI: 1.061-2.069; p=0.018) and to laboratories (PR=1.438; 95%CI: 1.047-1.974; p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is concluded that the research productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences is low. It is imperative to strengthen the university research culture that empowers students as agents of change and strengthens faculty participation in scientific networks and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conditioning factors for the scientific productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences at a private Peruvian University: A cross-sectional analytical study.\",\"authors\":\"César Antonio Bonilla-Asalde, Isabel Cristina Rivera-Lozada, Oriana Rivera-Lozada\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.143021.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the conditioning factors for scientific research productivity in university students of health sciences.Scientific productivity, in addition to making visible the generation of new knowledge, contributes to the well-being of the population and provides feedback to the scientific community in terms of methodologies, perspectives and results that help to break down barriers that delimit productivity in scientific research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted. The study population was 4104 students enrolled during the 2021-I semester in the Faculty of Health Sciences of a private Peruvian university. A sample size of 400 students was determined and a stratified probability sampling was used. The variables were measured through surveys. The dependent variable was scientific research productivity, and the independent variables were institutional culture, knowledge management and technological capital. Summary measures are reported according to the type of variable. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was applied to assess the association between the variables of interest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Stepwise method. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the total of 400 students, 74.5% were male, 57.25% were aged between 18 and 27 years, 17% belonged to the school of human medicine and 72% were in their sixth year of studies. Scientific research productivity was associated with management commitment (PR=1.493; 95%CI: 1.077-2.068, p=0.015), sense of personal growth (PR=1.632; 95%CI: 1.041-2.558; p=0.024), recognition by the university (PR=1.385; 95%CI: 1.012-1.896; p=0.043), strategic alliances (PR=1.422; 95%CI: 1.032-1.959; p=0. 03), having research proposals (PR=1.522; 95%CI: 1.114-2.08; p=0.009), dissemination of results obtained (PR=1.542; 95%CI: 1.12-2.122; p=0.01), availability of human resources (PR=1.591; 95%CI: 1.165-2.173; p=0.004), access to equipment and software (PR=1.482; 95%CI: 1.061-2.069; p=0.018) and to laboratories (PR=1.438; 95%CI: 1.047-1.974; p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is concluded that the research productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences is low. It is imperative to strengthen the university research culture that empowers students as agents of change and strengthens faculty participation in scientific networks and communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143021.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143021.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conditioning factors for the scientific productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences at a private Peruvian University: A cross-sectional analytical study.
Background: The objective of this study was to determine the conditioning factors for scientific research productivity in university students of health sciences.Scientific productivity, in addition to making visible the generation of new knowledge, contributes to the well-being of the population and provides feedback to the scientific community in terms of methodologies, perspectives and results that help to break down barriers that delimit productivity in scientific research.
Methods: A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted. The study population was 4104 students enrolled during the 2021-I semester in the Faculty of Health Sciences of a private Peruvian university. A sample size of 400 students was determined and a stratified probability sampling was used. The variables were measured through surveys. The dependent variable was scientific research productivity, and the independent variables were institutional culture, knowledge management and technological capital. Summary measures are reported according to the type of variable. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was applied to assess the association between the variables of interest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Stepwise method. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.
Results: From the total of 400 students, 74.5% were male, 57.25% were aged between 18 and 27 years, 17% belonged to the school of human medicine and 72% were in their sixth year of studies. Scientific research productivity was associated with management commitment (PR=1.493; 95%CI: 1.077-2.068, p=0.015), sense of personal growth (PR=1.632; 95%CI: 1.041-2.558; p=0.024), recognition by the university (PR=1.385; 95%CI: 1.012-1.896; p=0.043), strategic alliances (PR=1.422; 95%CI: 1.032-1.959; p=0. 03), having research proposals (PR=1.522; 95%CI: 1.114-2.08; p=0.009), dissemination of results obtained (PR=1.542; 95%CI: 1.12-2.122; p=0.01), availability of human resources (PR=1.591; 95%CI: 1.165-2.173; p=0.004), access to equipment and software (PR=1.482; 95%CI: 1.061-2.069; p=0.018) and to laboratories (PR=1.438; 95%CI: 1.047-1.974; p=0.024).
Conclusion: It is concluded that the research productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences is low. It is imperative to strengthen the university research culture that empowers students as agents of change and strengthens faculty participation in scientific networks and communities.
F1000ResearchPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍:
F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.