实时质谱法(DART-MS)直接分析可可粉中的角豆粉。

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1080/19440049.2025.2453496
Chris M Maragos
{"title":"实时质谱法(DART-MS)直接分析可可粉中的角豆粉。","authors":"Chris M Maragos","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2025.2453496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cocoa is a high value product and therefore a potential target for economic adulteration with less expensive ingredients. Carob flour is less expensive than cocoa powder and is frequently cited as a potential cocoa substitute. While carob has legitimate uses as a cocoa replacement, these characteristics also make it a potential adulterant of cocoa powder. Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) is an ambient ionization MS technique that can be used to rapidly interrogate samples. Samples of cocoa powders, carob flours, and mixtures of the two were extracted with buffer and interrogated by DART-MS. The mass spectra were used to develop models to distinguish between cocoa powder and cocoa powder adulterated with carob. A principal component-linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) model was used to discriminate between cocoa powder and cocoa powder amended with 15% carob flour. The accuracy using internal validation was 100%. Using an external validation dataset, the accuracy, precision, and recall were 96.0%, 94.8%, and 97.3%, respectively. These results demonstrate that DART-MS can be used to discriminate between cocoa powder and cocoa powder adulterated with 15% carob.</p>","PeriodicalId":12295,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"293-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of carob flour in cocoa powder by direct analysis in real time-mass spectrometry (DART-MS).\",\"authors\":\"Chris M Maragos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19440049.2025.2453496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cocoa is a high value product and therefore a potential target for economic adulteration with less expensive ingredients. Carob flour is less expensive than cocoa powder and is frequently cited as a potential cocoa substitute. While carob has legitimate uses as a cocoa replacement, these characteristics also make it a potential adulterant of cocoa powder. Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) is an ambient ionization MS technique that can be used to rapidly interrogate samples. Samples of cocoa powders, carob flours, and mixtures of the two were extracted with buffer and interrogated by DART-MS. The mass spectra were used to develop models to distinguish between cocoa powder and cocoa powder adulterated with carob. A principal component-linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) model was used to discriminate between cocoa powder and cocoa powder amended with 15% carob flour. The accuracy using internal validation was 100%. Using an external validation dataset, the accuracy, precision, and recall were 96.0%, 94.8%, and 97.3%, respectively. These results demonstrate that DART-MS can be used to discriminate between cocoa powder and cocoa powder adulterated with 15% carob.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"293-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2025.2453496\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2025.2453496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可可是一种高价值的产品,因此是用较便宜的原料进行经济掺假的潜在目标。角豆粉比可可粉便宜,经常被认为是潜在的可可替代品。虽然角豆豆作为可可的替代品有合法的用途,但这些特性也使它成为可可粉的潜在掺杂物。直接分析实时质谱(DART-MS)是一种环境电离质谱技术,可用于快速询问样品。用缓冲液提取可可粉、角豆粉和两者的混合物样品,用DART-MS检测。用质谱建立了可可粉和掺入角豆豆的可可粉的鉴别模型。采用主成分-线性判别分析(PCA-LDA)模型对可可粉和添加15%角豆粉的可可粉进行了判别。内部验证的准确度为100%。使用外部验证数据集,正确率、精密度和召回率分别为96.0%、94.8%和97.3%。这些结果表明,DART-MS可以用来区分可可粉和掺入15%角豆豆的可可粉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of carob flour in cocoa powder by direct analysis in real time-mass spectrometry (DART-MS).

Cocoa is a high value product and therefore a potential target for economic adulteration with less expensive ingredients. Carob flour is less expensive than cocoa powder and is frequently cited as a potential cocoa substitute. While carob has legitimate uses as a cocoa replacement, these characteristics also make it a potential adulterant of cocoa powder. Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) is an ambient ionization MS technique that can be used to rapidly interrogate samples. Samples of cocoa powders, carob flours, and mixtures of the two were extracted with buffer and interrogated by DART-MS. The mass spectra were used to develop models to distinguish between cocoa powder and cocoa powder adulterated with carob. A principal component-linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) model was used to discriminate between cocoa powder and cocoa powder amended with 15% carob flour. The accuracy using internal validation was 100%. Using an external validation dataset, the accuracy, precision, and recall were 96.0%, 94.8%, and 97.3%, respectively. These results demonstrate that DART-MS can be used to discriminate between cocoa powder and cocoa powder adulterated with 15% carob.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A publishes original research papers and critical reviews covering analytical methodology, occurrence, persistence, safety evaluation, detoxification and regulatory control of natural and man-made additives and contaminants in the food and animal feed chain. Papers are published in the areas of food additives including flavourings, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, environmental contaminants, plant toxins, mycotoxins, marine biotoxins, trace elements, migration from food packaging, food process contaminants, adulteration, authenticity and allergenicity of foods. Papers are published on animal feed where residues and contaminants can give rise to food safety concerns. Contributions cover chemistry, biochemistry and bioavailability of these substances, factors affecting levels during production, processing, packaging and storage; the development of novel foods and processes; exposure and risk assessment.
期刊最新文献
Bio-preservative potential of marjoram and fennel essential oil nano-emulsions against toxigenic fungi in citrus: integrating in-vitro, in-vivo, and in-silico approaches. Time dependence of the pre-chromatographic oxidation method for bivalves contaminated with paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins. From Cow's Milk to Cheese, Yogurt, and Labneh: Evaluating aflatoxin M1 fate in Traditional Lebanese Dairy Processing and the Efficacy of Regulations through a Risk Assessment Approach. Natural occurrence of semicarbazide in heather honey. Feasible approaches for arsenic speciation analysis in foods for dietary exposure assessment: a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1