机械反射和代谢反射对中枢血压波形的不同影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1489412
Nobuhiro Nakamura, Peng Heng, Naoyuki Hayashi
{"title":"机械反射和代谢反射对中枢血压波形的不同影响。","authors":"Nobuhiro Nakamura, Peng Heng, Naoyuki Hayashi","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1489412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effect of mechanoreflex on central blood pressure (BP) is unclear, although the influence of metaboreflex has been investigated. A relatively small contribution of the mechanoreflex to the pressor response to exercise has been considered in humans because many studies have failed to isolate the mechanoreflex-mediated pressor response. In a recent study, we successfully isolated a mechanoreflex-mediated pressor response using static passive stretching (SPS) in the forearm. Thus, it is possible to isolate the effect of the mechanoreflex on the central BP using this recently developed method. We investigated the effect of muscle mechanoreflex on central BP and compared the changes in the shape of the central BP waveform during mechanoreflex and metaboreflex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured 12 healthy males (age, 26 ± 2 years; height, 171.1 ± 5.2 cm; body mass, 63.3 ± 10.3 kg; body fat, 16.7% ± 3.9%; means ± standard deviation [SD]) in this study. All participants performed static passive stretching (SPS) of the forearm for 60 s to isolate the muscle mechanoreflex. They also performed 120 s of isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% maximal voluntary contraction and underwent 180 s of post-exercise ischemia (PEI) to isolate the muscle metaboreflex. The carotid BP (cBP) waveform was obtained from the right common carotid artery as the central BP waveform. We evaluated the first systolic peak (P1) and second systolic peak (P2) from the cBP waveform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SPS increased cBP with an increase in P1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas PEI increased cBP with an increase in P2 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). SPS did not alter augmentation pressure (AP) (<i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas PEI increased it (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The relative change from rest (Δ) in P1 during SPS was positively correlated with that in stroke volume (r = 0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and the ΔAP during PEI was positively correlated with that in total peripheral resistance TPR (r = 0.61; <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest different effects of mechano- and metaboreflex on the change in shape of the central BP waveform; mechanoreflex and metaboreflex deform P1 and P2, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1489412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different effects of mechano- and metaboreflex on the central blood pressure waveform.\",\"authors\":\"Nobuhiro Nakamura, Peng Heng, Naoyuki Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2024.1489412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effect of mechanoreflex on central blood pressure (BP) is unclear, although the influence of metaboreflex has been investigated. A relatively small contribution of the mechanoreflex to the pressor response to exercise has been considered in humans because many studies have failed to isolate the mechanoreflex-mediated pressor response. In a recent study, we successfully isolated a mechanoreflex-mediated pressor response using static passive stretching (SPS) in the forearm. Thus, it is possible to isolate the effect of the mechanoreflex on the central BP using this recently developed method. We investigated the effect of muscle mechanoreflex on central BP and compared the changes in the shape of the central BP waveform during mechanoreflex and metaboreflex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured 12 healthy males (age, 26 ± 2 years; height, 171.1 ± 5.2 cm; body mass, 63.3 ± 10.3 kg; body fat, 16.7% ± 3.9%; means ± standard deviation [SD]) in this study. All participants performed static passive stretching (SPS) of the forearm for 60 s to isolate the muscle mechanoreflex. They also performed 120 s of isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% maximal voluntary contraction and underwent 180 s of post-exercise ischemia (PEI) to isolate the muscle metaboreflex. The carotid BP (cBP) waveform was obtained from the right common carotid artery as the central BP waveform. We evaluated the first systolic peak (P1) and second systolic peak (P2) from the cBP waveform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SPS increased cBP with an increase in P1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas PEI increased cBP with an increase in P2 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). SPS did not alter augmentation pressure (AP) (<i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas PEI increased it (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The relative change from rest (Δ) in P1 during SPS was positively correlated with that in stroke volume (r = 0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and the ΔAP during PEI was positively correlated with that in total peripheral resistance TPR (r = 0.61; <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest different effects of mechano- and metaboreflex on the change in shape of the central BP waveform; mechanoreflex and metaboreflex deform P1 and P2, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1489412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1489412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1489412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:机械反射对中心血压(BP)的影响尚不清楚,尽管代谢反射的影响已被研究过。由于许多研究未能分离出机械反射介导的压力反应,因此人们认为机械反射对运动后的压力反应的贡献相对较小。在最近的一项研究中,我们成功地分离了机械反射介导的压力反应,使用静态被动拉伸(SPS)在前臂。因此,使用这种最近开发的方法可以分离出机械反射对中央BP的影响。我们研究了肌肉机械反射对中枢血压的影响,并比较了机械反射和代谢反射时中枢血压波形形状的变化。方法:对12例健康男性(年龄26±2岁;高度:171.1±5.2 cm;体重:63.3±10.3 kg;体脂,16.7%±3.9%;平均值±标准差[SD])。所有参与者进行静态被动拉伸(SPS)的前臂60秒,以隔离肌肉机械反射。他们还进行了120秒的等距握力(IHG)和180秒的运动后缺血(PEI)来隔离肌肉代谢反射。取右侧颈总动脉的颈动脉血压(cBP)波形作为中央血压波形。我们从cBP波形中评估第一收缩期峰值(P1)和第二收缩期峰值(P2)。结果:SPS升高cBP, P1升高(p < 0.05), PEI升高cBP, P2升高(p < 0.05)。SPS没有改变增压(AP) (p < 0.05), PEI增加了增压(p < 0.05)。静息期P1的相对变化(Δ)与卒中量呈正相关(r = 0.68;p < 0.05), PEI期间ΔAP与总外周阻力TPR呈正相关(r = 0.61;P < 0.05)。结论:机械反射和代谢反射对中央血压波形形态变化的影响不同;机械反射和代谢反射分别使P1和P2变形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Different effects of mechano- and metaboreflex on the central blood pressure waveform.

Introduction: The effect of mechanoreflex on central blood pressure (BP) is unclear, although the influence of metaboreflex has been investigated. A relatively small contribution of the mechanoreflex to the pressor response to exercise has been considered in humans because many studies have failed to isolate the mechanoreflex-mediated pressor response. In a recent study, we successfully isolated a mechanoreflex-mediated pressor response using static passive stretching (SPS) in the forearm. Thus, it is possible to isolate the effect of the mechanoreflex on the central BP using this recently developed method. We investigated the effect of muscle mechanoreflex on central BP and compared the changes in the shape of the central BP waveform during mechanoreflex and metaboreflex.

Methods: We measured 12 healthy males (age, 26 ± 2 years; height, 171.1 ± 5.2 cm; body mass, 63.3 ± 10.3 kg; body fat, 16.7% ± 3.9%; means ± standard deviation [SD]) in this study. All participants performed static passive stretching (SPS) of the forearm for 60 s to isolate the muscle mechanoreflex. They also performed 120 s of isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% maximal voluntary contraction and underwent 180 s of post-exercise ischemia (PEI) to isolate the muscle metaboreflex. The carotid BP (cBP) waveform was obtained from the right common carotid artery as the central BP waveform. We evaluated the first systolic peak (P1) and second systolic peak (P2) from the cBP waveform.

Results: SPS increased cBP with an increase in P1 (p < 0.05), whereas PEI increased cBP with an increase in P2 (p < 0.05). SPS did not alter augmentation pressure (AP) (p > 0.05), whereas PEI increased it (p < 0.05). The relative change from rest (Δ) in P1 during SPS was positively correlated with that in stroke volume (r = 0.68; p < 0.05), and the ΔAP during PEI was positively correlated with that in total peripheral resistance TPR (r = 0.61; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: These results suggest different effects of mechano- and metaboreflex on the change in shape of the central BP waveform; mechanoreflex and metaboreflex deform P1 and P2, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Effects of 6-week sprint interval training compared to traditional training on the running performance of distance runners: a randomized controlled trail. Work rate adjustments needed to maintain heart rate and RPE during high-intensity interval training in the heat. Editorial: Integrating machine learning with physics-based modeling of physiological systems. Effect of Cd-Zn compound contamination on the physiological response of broad bean and aphids. Effect of self-paced sprint interval training and low-volume HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness: the role of heart rate and power output.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1