胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在门诊上内镜患者中的应用与内镜和麻醉结果相关。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.004
Sarjukumar Panchal, Nadim Mahmud, Joshua H Atkins, Hansol Kang, Alexandra Leto, Anna Goebel, Namrita Trivedi, Ahmed Chatila, Wei-Wen Hsu, Gregory G Ginsberg, Octavia Pickett-Blakeley, Inuk Zandvakili
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在门诊上内镜患者中的应用与内镜和麻醉结果相关。","authors":"Sarjukumar Panchal, Nadim Mahmud, Joshua H Atkins, Hansol Kang, Alexandra Leto, Anna Goebel, Namrita Trivedi, Ahmed Chatila, Wei-Wen Hsu, Gregory G Ginsberg, Octavia Pickett-Blakeley, Inuk Zandvakili","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) can cause delayed gastric emptying, raising concern for retained gastric contents (RGCs) during endoscopy and adverse anesthesia events. We aimed to determine associations between GLP1RA and endoscopy and anesthesia outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study examined patients prescribed GLP1RA who underwent outpatient endoscopy stratified by exposure at the time of endoscopy. The GLP1RA group had ≥6 weeks of exposure as confirmed by pharmacy dispensation reports. The control group were patients not on GLP1RA at the time of endoscopy (prescription never filled, discontinued ≥6 weeks prior, or started post-endoscopy). The outcomes were the presence of solid RGCs, aborted procedures or any adverse anesthesia events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>598 patients were included in the study with 360 on GLP1RA and 298 controls. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, chronic opiate use, gastroparesis and prior gastric surgery were similar, but diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in the GLP1RA group (68% vs. 57%, p=0.005). The odds of solid RGCs was significantly higher in the GLP1RA group in multivariate analysis (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.57-9.21; p=0.003), but odds were not increased in patients undergoing concurrent colonoscopy. More patients in the GLP1RA group had procedures aborted (1.3% vs. 0%, p=0.021), but rates of hypoxia were similar (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p=0.341). There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients on GLP1RAs have increased rates of solid RGCs during upper endoscopy, but not with concurrent colonoscopy, and higher rates of aborted procedures, but similar rates of adverse anesthesia events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopy and Anesthesia Outcomes Associated with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist use in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Sarjukumar Panchal, Nadim Mahmud, Joshua H Atkins, Hansol Kang, Alexandra Leto, Anna Goebel, Namrita Trivedi, Ahmed Chatila, Wei-Wen Hsu, Gregory G Ginsberg, Octavia Pickett-Blakeley, Inuk Zandvakili\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) can cause delayed gastric emptying, raising concern for retained gastric contents (RGCs) during endoscopy and adverse anesthesia events. We aimed to determine associations between GLP1RA and endoscopy and anesthesia outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study examined patients prescribed GLP1RA who underwent outpatient endoscopy stratified by exposure at the time of endoscopy. The GLP1RA group had ≥6 weeks of exposure as confirmed by pharmacy dispensation reports. The control group were patients not on GLP1RA at the time of endoscopy (prescription never filled, discontinued ≥6 weeks prior, or started post-endoscopy). The outcomes were the presence of solid RGCs, aborted procedures or any adverse anesthesia events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>598 patients were included in the study with 360 on GLP1RA and 298 controls. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, chronic opiate use, gastroparesis and prior gastric surgery were similar, but diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in the GLP1RA group (68% vs. 57%, p=0.005). The odds of solid RGCs was significantly higher in the GLP1RA group in multivariate analysis (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.57-9.21; p=0.003), but odds were not increased in patients undergoing concurrent colonoscopy. More patients in the GLP1RA group had procedures aborted (1.3% vs. 0%, p=0.021), but rates of hypoxia were similar (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p=0.341). There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients on GLP1RAs have increased rates of solid RGCs during upper endoscopy, but not with concurrent colonoscopy, and higher rates of aborted procedures, but similar rates of adverse anesthesia events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1RAs)可引起胃排空延迟,引起对内镜检查时胃内容物残留(RGCs)和麻醉不良事件的关注。我们的目的是确定GLP1RA与内窥镜和麻醉结果之间的关系。方法:这项单中心回顾性队列研究检查了在门诊内镜检查时使用GLP1RA的患者。经药房配药报告证实,GLP1RA组暴露时间≥6周。对照组为内镜检查时未服用GLP1RA的患者(处方未配药,在内镜检查前≥6周停用,或在内镜检查后开始使用)。结果是固体rgc的存在,手术流产或任何不良麻醉事件。结果:598例患者纳入研究,其中360例使用GLP1RA, 298例对照组。基线特征包括年龄、性别、慢性阿片类药物使用、胃轻瘫和既往胃手术相似,但糖尿病在GLP1RA组更普遍(68%对57%,p=0.005)。多变量分析显示,GLP1RA组固体性rgc的发生率显著高于GLP1RA组(OR 3.80;95% ci 1.57-9.21;P =0.003),但同时进行结肠镜检查的患者的风险没有增加。GLP1RA组有更多的患者手术流产(1.3%比0%,p=0.021),但缺氧率相似(0.2%比0.3%,p=0.341)。无肺误吸病例。结论:接受GLP1RAs治疗的患者在上胃镜检查时固体rgc的发生率增加,但同时进行结肠镜检查时没有增加,手术流产率更高,但麻醉不良事件的发生率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopy and Anesthesia Outcomes Associated with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist use in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy.

Background and aims: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) can cause delayed gastric emptying, raising concern for retained gastric contents (RGCs) during endoscopy and adverse anesthesia events. We aimed to determine associations between GLP1RA and endoscopy and anesthesia outcomes.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study examined patients prescribed GLP1RA who underwent outpatient endoscopy stratified by exposure at the time of endoscopy. The GLP1RA group had ≥6 weeks of exposure as confirmed by pharmacy dispensation reports. The control group were patients not on GLP1RA at the time of endoscopy (prescription never filled, discontinued ≥6 weeks prior, or started post-endoscopy). The outcomes were the presence of solid RGCs, aborted procedures or any adverse anesthesia events.

Results: 598 patients were included in the study with 360 on GLP1RA and 298 controls. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, chronic opiate use, gastroparesis and prior gastric surgery were similar, but diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in the GLP1RA group (68% vs. 57%, p=0.005). The odds of solid RGCs was significantly higher in the GLP1RA group in multivariate analysis (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.57-9.21; p=0.003), but odds were not increased in patients undergoing concurrent colonoscopy. More patients in the GLP1RA group had procedures aborted (1.3% vs. 0%, p=0.021), but rates of hypoxia were similar (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p=0.341). There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration.

Conclusion: Patients on GLP1RAs have increased rates of solid RGCs during upper endoscopy, but not with concurrent colonoscopy, and higher rates of aborted procedures, but similar rates of adverse anesthesia events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Prospective randomized controlled trial of water exchange plus cap versus water exchange colonoscopy in unsedated veterans Boosting efficiency in the endoscopy suite: integrating team workflows improves productivity and minimizes cost Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and capsule endoscopy in patients with diabetes: a matched cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1