食管活检对嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎的诊断价值。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.018
Mayssan Muftah MD, MPH , Davis A. Hartnett MD , Brent Hiramoto MD, MPH , Ryan Leung MBBS , Ryan Flanagan MD, MPH , Jennifer X. Cai MD, MPH , Wai-Kit Lo MD, MPH , Walter W. Chan MD, MPH
{"title":"食管活检对嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎的诊断价值。","authors":"Mayssan Muftah MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Davis A. Hartnett MD ,&nbsp;Brent Hiramoto MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ryan Leung MBBS ,&nbsp;Ryan Flanagan MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Jennifer X. Cai MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Wai-Kit Lo MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Walter W. Chan MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>The pattern of inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is patchy, necessitating multiple biopsies to optimize diagnostic yield. Current consensus-based guidelines recommend 6 total biopsy samples at 2 sites, distal and either middle or proximal esophagus, although this recommendation is based on limited data. We aimed to determine whether this biopsy protocol sufficiently captures EoE diagnoses by evaluating the distribution of eosinophilia in a large EoE cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients newly diagnosed with EoE with ≥2 esophageal segments biopsied. Demographic variables, clinical characteristics/history, endoscopic findings, and histologic results were manually reviewed. Distribution (proximal, middle, and/or distal) of eosinophilia (&gt;15 eosinophils/high-power field [HPF]) was assessed. Predictors for non-distal disease (&lt;15 eosinophils/HPF on distal biopsy samples) were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 511 patients newly diagnosed with EoE with ≥2 segments biopsied were included. All patients underwent distal esophageal biopsy. Overall, 286 (56.0%) had ≥1 site with &lt;15 eosinophils/HPF, including 51 (10%) with non-distal disease. Among patients with 3 segments biopsied (n = 60), 19 (31.7%) had eosinophilia at only 1 site, including 6 (10%) with isolated midesophageal disease and no isolated proximal eosinophilia. Discordant mid and proximal biopsy results were found in 18 (30%) patients, with 17 of 18 (94.4%) having mid esophageal eosinophilia. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002-1.04; <em>P</em> = .03) and male sex (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.002-3.55; <em>P</em> = .049) independently predict non-distal disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Isolated segmental eosinophilia is common in EoE, including up to 10% non-distal disease. Discordant mid and proximal biopsy findings are prevalent, with no isolated proximal eosinophilia. Standard protocol should include routine biopsies of both distal and middle esophagus to maximize diagnostic yield.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"102 2","pages":"Pages 194-201.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yield of esophageal biopsy patterns for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis\",\"authors\":\"Mayssan Muftah MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Davis A. Hartnett MD ,&nbsp;Brent Hiramoto MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ryan Leung MBBS ,&nbsp;Ryan Flanagan MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Jennifer X. Cai MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Wai-Kit Lo MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Walter W. Chan MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>The pattern of inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is patchy, necessitating multiple biopsies to optimize diagnostic yield. Current consensus-based guidelines recommend 6 total biopsy samples at 2 sites, distal and either middle or proximal esophagus, although this recommendation is based on limited data. We aimed to determine whether this biopsy protocol sufficiently captures EoE diagnoses by evaluating the distribution of eosinophilia in a large EoE cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients newly diagnosed with EoE with ≥2 esophageal segments biopsied. Demographic variables, clinical characteristics/history, endoscopic findings, and histologic results were manually reviewed. Distribution (proximal, middle, and/or distal) of eosinophilia (&gt;15 eosinophils/high-power field [HPF]) was assessed. Predictors for non-distal disease (&lt;15 eosinophils/HPF on distal biopsy samples) were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 511 patients newly diagnosed with EoE with ≥2 segments biopsied were included. All patients underwent distal esophageal biopsy. Overall, 286 (56.0%) had ≥1 site with &lt;15 eosinophils/HPF, including 51 (10%) with non-distal disease. Among patients with 3 segments biopsied (n = 60), 19 (31.7%) had eosinophilia at only 1 site, including 6 (10%) with isolated midesophageal disease and no isolated proximal eosinophilia. Discordant mid and proximal biopsy results were found in 18 (30%) patients, with 17 of 18 (94.4%) having mid esophageal eosinophilia. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002-1.04; <em>P</em> = .03) and male sex (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.002-3.55; <em>P</em> = .049) independently predict non-distal disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Isolated segmental eosinophilia is common in EoE, including up to 10% non-distal disease. Discordant mid and proximal biopsy findings are prevalent, with no isolated proximal eosinophilia. Standard protocol should include routine biopsies of both distal and middle esophagus to maximize diagnostic yield.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"102 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 194-201.e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510725000434\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510725000434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)的炎症模式是斑片状的,需要多次活检以优化诊断率。目前基于共识的指南建议在两个部位进行6次总活检:食管远端和食管中或近端,尽管基于有限的数据。我们的目的是通过评估大量EoE队列中嗜酸性粒细胞的分布来确定这种活检方案是否足以捕获EoE诊断。方法:回顾性研究连续进行≥2个食管节段活检的新诊断EoE患者。人口统计学、临床特征/病史、内窥镜检查结果和组织学结果手工回顾。评估嗜酸性粒细胞分布(近端、中端和/或远端)(嗜酸性粒细胞/hpf)。非远端疾病的预测因素(结果:纳入511例新诊断的EoE患者,活检≥2节段。所有患者均行远端食管活检。结论:孤立的节段性嗜酸性粒细胞增多症在EoE中很常见,包括高达10%的非远端疾病。中间和近端活检结果不一致是普遍存在的,没有孤立的近端嗜酸性粒细胞增多。标准方案应包括食管远端和中段的常规活检,以最大限度地提高诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yield of esophageal biopsy patterns for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis

Background and Aims

The pattern of inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is patchy, necessitating multiple biopsies to optimize diagnostic yield. Current consensus-based guidelines recommend 6 total biopsy samples at 2 sites, distal and either middle or proximal esophagus, although this recommendation is based on limited data. We aimed to determine whether this biopsy protocol sufficiently captures EoE diagnoses by evaluating the distribution of eosinophilia in a large EoE cohort.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients newly diagnosed with EoE with ≥2 esophageal segments biopsied. Demographic variables, clinical characteristics/history, endoscopic findings, and histologic results were manually reviewed. Distribution (proximal, middle, and/or distal) of eosinophilia (>15 eosinophils/high-power field [HPF]) was assessed. Predictors for non-distal disease (<15 eosinophils/HPF on distal biopsy samples) were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 511 patients newly diagnosed with EoE with ≥2 segments biopsied were included. All patients underwent distal esophageal biopsy. Overall, 286 (56.0%) had ≥1 site with <15 eosinophils/HPF, including 51 (10%) with non-distal disease. Among patients with 3 segments biopsied (n = 60), 19 (31.7%) had eosinophilia at only 1 site, including 6 (10%) with isolated midesophageal disease and no isolated proximal eosinophilia. Discordant mid and proximal biopsy results were found in 18 (30%) patients, with 17 of 18 (94.4%) having mid esophageal eosinophilia. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002-1.04; P = .03) and male sex (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.002-3.55; P = .049) independently predict non-distal disease.

Conclusions

Isolated segmental eosinophilia is common in EoE, including up to 10% non-distal disease. Discordant mid and proximal biopsy findings are prevalent, with no isolated proximal eosinophilia. Standard protocol should include routine biopsies of both distal and middle esophagus to maximize diagnostic yield.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on endoscopic management of benign and malignant colonic strictures. Does the endoscopic gastric remodeling platform matter? Pyloric endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe and clinical response to gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy: let the numbers do the talking. Response. Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1