卫生系统软件的概念如何用于卫生政策和系统研究?范围审查。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaf001
Nicola Burger, Lucy Gilson
{"title":"卫生系统软件的概念如何用于卫生政策和系统研究?范围审查。","authors":"Nicola Burger, Lucy Gilson","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding health systems as comprising interacting elements of hardware and software acknowledges health systems as complex adaptive systems (CAS). Hardware represents the concrete components of systems, whereas software represents the elements which influence actions and underpin relationships, such as processes, values and norms As a specific call for research on health system software was made in 2011, we conducted a qualitative scoping review considering how and for what purpose the concept has been used since then. Our overall purpose was to synthesise current knowledge and generate lessons about how to deepen research on, and understanding of, health system software. The review consisted of two phases: first, for the period 2011-2023, all papers which explicitly used the concept of health system software were identified and mapped; second, drawing on a sub-set of papers from phase 1, we explored how the concept was purposively used within research. The databases Pubmed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched using a strategy developed by a skilled librarian. In Phase 1, data were extracted from 98 papers. Our analysis revealed that a third of the papers used the software concept rather superficially; a third used it to conceptualise the importance of selected software elements; and a third used it in examining a specific health system experience, such as preparedness or resilience. In Phase 2, our analysis confirmed that researchers have found value in pro-actively using the software concept within studies, demonstrating two patterns of use. However, limited understanding of how to investigate interactions amongst hard- and software elements was also revealed. Future health policy and systems research should purposively investigate hardware-software interactions, in order to gain greater understanding of the complex, adaptive nature of health systems, understand their operations, and to institutionalise thinking that considers health systems as CASs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How has the concept of health system software been used in health policy and systems research? A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Burger, Lucy Gilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czaf001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding health systems as comprising interacting elements of hardware and software acknowledges health systems as complex adaptive systems (CAS). Hardware represents the concrete components of systems, whereas software represents the elements which influence actions and underpin relationships, such as processes, values and norms As a specific call for research on health system software was made in 2011, we conducted a qualitative scoping review considering how and for what purpose the concept has been used since then. Our overall purpose was to synthesise current knowledge and generate lessons about how to deepen research on, and understanding of, health system software. The review consisted of two phases: first, for the period 2011-2023, all papers which explicitly used the concept of health system software were identified and mapped; second, drawing on a sub-set of papers from phase 1, we explored how the concept was purposively used within research. The databases Pubmed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched using a strategy developed by a skilled librarian. In Phase 1, data were extracted from 98 papers. Our analysis revealed that a third of the papers used the software concept rather superficially; a third used it to conceptualise the importance of selected software elements; and a third used it in examining a specific health system experience, such as preparedness or resilience. In Phase 2, our analysis confirmed that researchers have found value in pro-actively using the software concept within studies, demonstrating two patterns of use. However, limited understanding of how to investigate interactions amongst hard- and software elements was also revealed. Future health policy and systems research should purposively investigate hardware-software interactions, in order to gain greater understanding of the complex, adaptive nature of health systems, understand their operations, and to institutionalise thinking that considers health systems as CASs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将卫生系统理解为由硬件和软件相互作用的元素组成,承认卫生系统是复杂的自适应系统(CAS)。硬件代表系统的具体组成部分,而软件则代表影响行动和支撑关系的要素,如流程、价值观和规范。2011年,我们特别呼吁对卫生系统软件进行研究,我们进行了定性范围审查,考虑了自那时以来该概念的使用方式和用途。我们的总体目的是综合当前的知识,并就如何深化对卫生系统软件的研究和理解产生经验教训。审查包括两个阶段:首先,2011-2023年期间,确定并绘制所有明确使用卫生系统软件概念的论文;其次,根据第一阶段的论文子集,我们探索了如何在研究中有目的地使用这个概念。数据库Pubmed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar使用一个熟练的图书管理员开发的策略进行系统搜索。在第一阶段,数据从98篇论文中提取。我们的分析显示,三分之一的论文对软件概念的使用相当肤浅;三分之一的人用它来概念化所选软件元素的重要性;三分之一的人将其用于检查特定的卫生系统经验,例如准备或恢复力。在第二阶段,我们的分析证实,研究人员已经发现了在研究中主动使用软件概念的价值,展示了两种使用模式。然而,对如何调查硬件和软件元素之间的交互的有限理解也被揭示出来。未来的卫生政策和系统研究应有目的地调查硬件-软件的相互作用,以便更好地了解卫生系统的复杂性和适应性,了解其运作,并将将卫生系统视为CASs的思维制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How has the concept of health system software been used in health policy and systems research? A scoping review.

Understanding health systems as comprising interacting elements of hardware and software acknowledges health systems as complex adaptive systems (CAS). Hardware represents the concrete components of systems, whereas software represents the elements which influence actions and underpin relationships, such as processes, values and norms As a specific call for research on health system software was made in 2011, we conducted a qualitative scoping review considering how and for what purpose the concept has been used since then. Our overall purpose was to synthesise current knowledge and generate lessons about how to deepen research on, and understanding of, health system software. The review consisted of two phases: first, for the period 2011-2023, all papers which explicitly used the concept of health system software were identified and mapped; second, drawing on a sub-set of papers from phase 1, we explored how the concept was purposively used within research. The databases Pubmed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched using a strategy developed by a skilled librarian. In Phase 1, data were extracted from 98 papers. Our analysis revealed that a third of the papers used the software concept rather superficially; a third used it to conceptualise the importance of selected software elements; and a third used it in examining a specific health system experience, such as preparedness or resilience. In Phase 2, our analysis confirmed that researchers have found value in pro-actively using the software concept within studies, demonstrating two patterns of use. However, limited understanding of how to investigate interactions amongst hard- and software elements was also revealed. Future health policy and systems research should purposively investigate hardware-software interactions, in order to gain greater understanding of the complex, adaptive nature of health systems, understand their operations, and to institutionalise thinking that considers health systems as CASs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
A Political Economy Analysis of Health Policymaking in Nigeria: The Genesis of the 2014 National Health Act. Correction to: Capacity and crisis: examining the state-level policy response to COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu, India. Can public education campaigns equitably counter the use of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products in African countries? How has the concept of health system software been used in health policy and systems research? A scoping review. Strengthening local health systems and governance for Universal Health Coverage: experiences and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic response in Quezon City, Philippines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1