复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的管理:评估间接治疗比较(ITC)可行性的系统文献综述。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s40121-024-01105-y
Johanna Eliasson Vinterberg, Julia Oddsdottir, Maria Nye, Philippe Pinton
{"title":"复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的管理:评估间接治疗比较(ITC)可行性的系统文献综述。","authors":"Johanna Eliasson Vinterberg, Julia Oddsdottir, Maria Nye, Philippe Pinton","doi":"10.1007/s40121-024-01105-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fecal-microbiota-based therapies are recommended for rCDI on completion of standard-of-care (SoC) antibiotics to prevent further recurrence: these therapies include conventional fecal-microbiota transplantation and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies REBYOTA® (RBL) and VOWST Oral Spores™ (VOS). As an alternative to microbiota-based therapies, bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used as adjuvant to SoC antibiotics to prevent rCDI. There are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing different microbiota-based therapies or bezlotoxumab for rCDI. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials on rCDI treatments and assess the feasibility of using them to conduct an indirect treatment comparison (ITC). The feasibility analysis determined that trial heterogeneity, particularly relating to inclusion criteria, may significantly compromise ITC and prevent cross-trial comparisons. Our analysis underlines the need to adopt standardized protocols to ensure comparability across trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI): A Systematic Literature Review to Assess the Feasibility of Indirect Treatment Comparison (ITC).\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Eliasson Vinterberg, Julia Oddsdottir, Maria Nye, Philippe Pinton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-024-01105-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fecal-microbiota-based therapies are recommended for rCDI on completion of standard-of-care (SoC) antibiotics to prevent further recurrence: these therapies include conventional fecal-microbiota transplantation and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies REBYOTA® (RBL) and VOWST Oral Spores™ (VOS). As an alternative to microbiota-based therapies, bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used as adjuvant to SoC antibiotics to prevent rCDI. There are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing different microbiota-based therapies or bezlotoxumab for rCDI. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials on rCDI treatments and assess the feasibility of using them to conduct an indirect treatment comparison (ITC). The feasibility analysis determined that trial heterogeneity, particularly relating to inclusion criteria, may significantly compromise ITC and prevent cross-trial comparisons. Our analysis underlines the need to adopt standardized protocols to ensure comparability across trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-01105-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-01105-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)是发病率、死亡率和医疗费用增加的主要原因。在完成标准治疗(SoC)抗生素治疗后,推荐以粪便微生物群为基础的治疗方法,以防止进一步复发:这些治疗方法包括传统的粪便微生物群移植和美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗REBYOTA®(RBL)和VOWST口服孢子™(VOS)。作为基于微生物群的治疗的替代方案,单克隆抗体bezlotoxumab被用作SoC抗生素的辅助剂来预防rCDI。目前还没有比较不同微生物群疗法或bezlotoxumab治疗rCDI的正面临床试验。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了系统的文献综述,以确定rCDI治疗的临床试验,并评估使用它们进行间接治疗比较(ITC)的可行性。可行性分析确定,试验异质性,特别是与纳入标准相关的异质性,可能会严重影响ITC,并妨碍交叉试验比较。我们的分析强调了采用标准化方案以确保试验间可比性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI): A Systematic Literature Review to Assess the Feasibility of Indirect Treatment Comparison (ITC).

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fecal-microbiota-based therapies are recommended for rCDI on completion of standard-of-care (SoC) antibiotics to prevent further recurrence: these therapies include conventional fecal-microbiota transplantation and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies REBYOTA® (RBL) and VOWST Oral Spores™ (VOS). As an alternative to microbiota-based therapies, bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used as adjuvant to SoC antibiotics to prevent rCDI. There are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing different microbiota-based therapies or bezlotoxumab for rCDI. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials on rCDI treatments and assess the feasibility of using them to conduct an indirect treatment comparison (ITC). The feasibility analysis determined that trial heterogeneity, particularly relating to inclusion criteria, may significantly compromise ITC and prevent cross-trial comparisons. Our analysis underlines the need to adopt standardized protocols to ensure comparability across trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
期刊最新文献
Delayed Transition to 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Pediatric National Immunization Programs: Forgone Public Health and Economic Benefit. A Phase 3B, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Quadrivalent Meningococcal Nimenrix® Vaccine When Given to Healthy Infants at 3 and 12 Months of Age. Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Who Have Survived an Episode of Sepsis in the United States: A Systematic Review. Predictors of COVID-19 Readmission Among Patients Previously Hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2. Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine 2-Drug Regimen in People Living with HIV: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1