胚胎捐赠技术对儿童心理适应和父母教养方式影响的比较研究

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Fertility & Sterility Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.22074/ijfs.2024.2016523.1581
Mahya Kaveh, Seyed Hamzeh Hosseini, Hamid Sharif Nia, Sepideh Peyvandi
{"title":"胚胎捐赠技术对儿童心理适应和父母教养方式影响的比较研究","authors":"Mahya Kaveh, Seyed Hamzeh Hosseini, Hamid Sharif Nia, Sepideh Peyvandi","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2024.2016523.1581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the remarkable advancements in the use of embryo donation, concerns have arisen regarding its potential effects on the psychological well-being of children conceived through this assisted reproductive technology and their parent-child relationships. The aim of the study is to evaluate children's psychological adjustment and parenting style in families with donor-conceived children and compare them with the normal population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A historical cohort study was conducted to assess the psychological adjustment of 31 children aged 3 to 7 years born via embryo donation and to compare the results with those of 30 age-matched children from families who conceived naturally using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The sample size was determined using G power, and the samples were selected using a convenient sampling method. Parenting styles within these families were also evaluated using the Baumrind Parenting Styles Inventory through clinical interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although 8 out of 31 children born through embryo donation (25.8%) and 3 out of 30 children from families with natural conception exhibited psychological maladjustment, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.249). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in parenting styles between the two groups (P values for permissive, authoritarian, and authoritative parenting styles were 0.424, 0.656, and 0.219, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of genetic parent-child relationships does not seem to be a dominant factor affecting the psychological adjustment of children or parenting styles.</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"19 1","pages":"96-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Embryo Donation Technology on Child Psychological Adjustment and parenting styles: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mahya Kaveh, Seyed Hamzeh Hosseini, Hamid Sharif Nia, Sepideh Peyvandi\",\"doi\":\"10.22074/ijfs.2024.2016523.1581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the remarkable advancements in the use of embryo donation, concerns have arisen regarding its potential effects on the psychological well-being of children conceived through this assisted reproductive technology and their parent-child relationships. The aim of the study is to evaluate children's psychological adjustment and parenting style in families with donor-conceived children and compare them with the normal population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A historical cohort study was conducted to assess the psychological adjustment of 31 children aged 3 to 7 years born via embryo donation and to compare the results with those of 30 age-matched children from families who conceived naturally using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The sample size was determined using G power, and the samples were selected using a convenient sampling method. Parenting styles within these families were also evaluated using the Baumrind Parenting Styles Inventory through clinical interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although 8 out of 31 children born through embryo donation (25.8%) and 3 out of 30 children from families with natural conception exhibited psychological maladjustment, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.249). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in parenting styles between the two groups (P values for permissive, authoritarian, and authoritative parenting styles were 0.424, 0.656, and 0.219, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of genetic parent-child relationships does not seem to be a dominant factor affecting the psychological adjustment of children or parenting styles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"96-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2016523.1581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2016523.1581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管胚胎捐赠的使用取得了显著的进步,但人们对其对通过这种辅助生殖技术怀孕的儿童的心理健康及其亲子关系的潜在影响感到担忧。本研究的目的是评估捐胎家庭儿童的心理适应和教养方式,并将其与正常人群进行比较。材料与方法:采用历史队列研究方法,对31例3 ~ 7岁通过胚胎捐赠出生的儿童的心理适应情况进行评估,并采用优势与困难问卷对30例同龄自然受孕儿童的心理适应情况进行比较。样本量采用G次幂确定,样本选取采用方便的抽样方法。通过临床访谈,使用鲍姆林德教养方式量表对这些家庭的教养方式进行评估。结果:虽然31例胚胎捐赠儿中有8例(25.8%)和30例自然受孕儿中有3例出现心理适应不良,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.249)。此外,两组的教养方式差异无统计学意义(纵容型、专制型和权威型教养方式的P值分别为0.424、0.656和0.219)。结论:缺乏遗传亲子关系似乎不是影响儿童心理适应或父母教养方式的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Embryo Donation Technology on Child Psychological Adjustment and parenting styles: A Comparative Study.

Background: Despite the remarkable advancements in the use of embryo donation, concerns have arisen regarding its potential effects on the psychological well-being of children conceived through this assisted reproductive technology and their parent-child relationships. The aim of the study is to evaluate children's psychological adjustment and parenting style in families with donor-conceived children and compare them with the normal population.

Materials and methods: A historical cohort study was conducted to assess the psychological adjustment of 31 children aged 3 to 7 years born via embryo donation and to compare the results with those of 30 age-matched children from families who conceived naturally using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The sample size was determined using G power, and the samples were selected using a convenient sampling method. Parenting styles within these families were also evaluated using the Baumrind Parenting Styles Inventory through clinical interviews.

Results: Although 8 out of 31 children born through embryo donation (25.8%) and 3 out of 30 children from families with natural conception exhibited psychological maladjustment, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.249). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in parenting styles between the two groups (P values for permissive, authoritarian, and authoritative parenting styles were 0.424, 0.656, and 0.219, respectively).

Conclusion: The lack of genetic parent-child relationships does not seem to be a dominant factor affecting the psychological adjustment of children or parenting styles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
期刊最新文献
Combined Effects of Chrysin Supplementation and Exercise Training on Diabetes-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in Rat Testicular Tissue. Association of The MCP-1 rs1024611 Polymorphism with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in A Population of Indian Women: A Case-Control Study. Clinical Pregnancy and Miscarriage Rates in relation to Vitamin D Supplementation among women with Hyper Androgenic PCOS: A prospective study. Impact of Varicocele on The Expression of Testicular Enzymes Involved in The Transsulfuration Pathway. Relation of Follicular Fluid Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products Concentration and Anti Mullerian Hormone in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Non-PCOS Women Referring to In Vitro Fertilization Center: Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1