植入式心律转复-除颤器治疗后患者的管理-多方面方法的重要性。

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Arrhythmia Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1002/joa3.13204
Karshana Selvarajah MSc, Parisha Khan MSc, Nishat Jahagirdar Pgdip, Antonio Cannatà MD, Rahul Mukherjee MBBS, PhD, Daniel I. Bromage MBChB, PhD, Theresa McDonagh MD, Francis Murgatroyd MA, FRCP, Paul A. Scott DM, FRCP
{"title":"植入式心律转复-除颤器治疗后患者的管理-多方面方法的重要性。","authors":"Karshana Selvarajah MSc,&nbsp;Parisha Khan MSc,&nbsp;Nishat Jahagirdar Pgdip,&nbsp;Antonio Cannatà MD,&nbsp;Rahul Mukherjee MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Daniel I. Bromage MBChB, PhD,&nbsp;Theresa McDonagh MD,&nbsp;Francis Murgatroyd MA, FRCP,&nbsp;Paul A. Scott DM, FRCP","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The most effective way to treat patients following a first ICD therapy is unclear. We hypothesised that following first ICD therapy, combining different treatment strategies would be associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy compared to single strategies alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at King's College Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. We assessed the use of 7 specific treatment strategies, introduced after the 1st therapy—start/increase the dose of beta-blockers, prognostic heart failure medications, antiarrhythmic drugs as well as ICD reprogramming, ablation, ICD upgrade/revision and coronary revascularisation. We evaluated the association between these treatment strategies and the risk of a subsequent ICD therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a mean 50 months follow-up, 267 patients experienced 1st ICD therapy (212 appropriate and 55 inappropriate). Combining treatment strategies was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy for appropriate therapy compared to 0/7 strategies (1st appropriate ICD therapy, 1/7 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 80), 43% lower risk and  ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 73) 58% reduction, <i>p</i> = &lt;.001). This was also true for inappropriate therapy (1st inappropriate therapy, 1 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 22) 86% lower risk and  ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 25), 94% reduction, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to patients with 0/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 8).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An approach combining treatment strategies may be more effective than using single strategies alone to prevent subsequent therapy in patients presenting following a 1st ICD therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of patients following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy—The importance of a multifaceted approach\",\"authors\":\"Karshana Selvarajah MSc,&nbsp;Parisha Khan MSc,&nbsp;Nishat Jahagirdar Pgdip,&nbsp;Antonio Cannatà MD,&nbsp;Rahul Mukherjee MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Daniel I. Bromage MBChB, PhD,&nbsp;Theresa McDonagh MD,&nbsp;Francis Murgatroyd MA, FRCP,&nbsp;Paul A. Scott DM, FRCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.13204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most effective way to treat patients following a first ICD therapy is unclear. We hypothesised that following first ICD therapy, combining different treatment strategies would be associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy compared to single strategies alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at King's College Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. We assessed the use of 7 specific treatment strategies, introduced after the 1st therapy—start/increase the dose of beta-blockers, prognostic heart failure medications, antiarrhythmic drugs as well as ICD reprogramming, ablation, ICD upgrade/revision and coronary revascularisation. We evaluated the association between these treatment strategies and the risk of a subsequent ICD therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During a mean 50 months follow-up, 267 patients experienced 1st ICD therapy (212 appropriate and 55 inappropriate). Combining treatment strategies was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy for appropriate therapy compared to 0/7 strategies (1st appropriate ICD therapy, 1/7 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 80), 43% lower risk and  ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 73) 58% reduction, <i>p</i> = &lt;.001). This was also true for inappropriate therapy (1st inappropriate therapy, 1 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 22) 86% lower risk and  ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 25), 94% reduction, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to patients with 0/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 8).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>An approach combining treatment strategies may be more effective than using single strategies alone to prevent subsequent therapy in patients presenting following a 1st ICD therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:首次ICD治疗后最有效的治疗方法尚不清楚。我们假设,在第一次ICD治疗后,与单独治疗相比,结合不同的治疗策略可以降低后续治疗的风险。方法:收集2009年1月至2019年12月在国王学院医院连续接受ICD植入的患者的数据。我们评估了7种特定治疗策略的使用情况,这些策略是在第一次治疗后引入的-受体阻滞剂、预后心力衰竭药物、抗心律失常药物以及ICD重编程、消融、ICD升级/翻修和冠状动脉血运重建。我们评估了这些治疗策略与后续ICD治疗风险之间的关系。结果:在平均50个月的随访中,267例患者接受了首次ICD治疗(212例合适,55例不合适)。与0/7策略相比,联合治疗策略与适当治疗的后续治疗风险显著降低相关(第一次适当的ICD治疗,1/7治疗策略(n = 80),风险降低43%;≥2/7治疗策略(n = 73),风险降低58%,p = n = 22);≥2/7治疗策略(n = 25),风险降低94%,p n = 8)。结论:对于首次ICD治疗后出现的患者,联合治疗策略可能比单独使用单一策略更有效地预防后续治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of patients following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy—The importance of a multifaceted approach

Background

The most effective way to treat patients following a first ICD therapy is unclear. We hypothesised that following first ICD therapy, combining different treatment strategies would be associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy compared to single strategies alone.

Methods

Data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at King's College Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. We assessed the use of 7 specific treatment strategies, introduced after the 1st therapy—start/increase the dose of beta-blockers, prognostic heart failure medications, antiarrhythmic drugs as well as ICD reprogramming, ablation, ICD upgrade/revision and coronary revascularisation. We evaluated the association between these treatment strategies and the risk of a subsequent ICD therapy.

Results

During a mean 50 months follow-up, 267 patients experienced 1st ICD therapy (212 appropriate and 55 inappropriate). Combining treatment strategies was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy for appropriate therapy compared to 0/7 strategies (1st appropriate ICD therapy, 1/7 treatment strategy (n = 80), 43% lower risk and  ≥2/7 treatment strategies (n = 73) 58% reduction, p = <.001). This was also true for inappropriate therapy (1st inappropriate therapy, 1 treatment strategy (n = 22) 86% lower risk and  ≥2/7 treatment strategies (n = 25), 94% reduction, p < 0.001) compared to patients with 0/7 treatment strategies (n = 8).

Conclusion

An approach combining treatment strategies may be more effective than using single strategies alone to prevent subsequent therapy in patients presenting following a 1st ICD therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Single snare pushing technique: A new bailout technique for retrieving Micra fixed in the tricuspid valve annulus Number needed to treat for net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation Electrocardiographic imaging metrics to predict the risk of arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy Impact of baseline-pool local impedance on lesion formation using a local impedance-sensing catheter: Lessons from a porcine experimental model Effectiveness of upgrade left bundle branch area pacing for right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: Extra QRS shortening matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1