Karshana Selvarajah MSc, Parisha Khan MSc, Nishat Jahagirdar Pgdip, Antonio Cannatà MD, Rahul Mukherjee MBBS, PhD, Daniel I. Bromage MBChB, PhD, Theresa McDonagh MD, Francis Murgatroyd MA, FRCP, Paul A. Scott DM, FRCP
{"title":"植入式心律转复-除颤器治疗后患者的管理-多方面方法的重要性。","authors":"Karshana Selvarajah MSc, Parisha Khan MSc, Nishat Jahagirdar Pgdip, Antonio Cannatà MD, Rahul Mukherjee MBBS, PhD, Daniel I. Bromage MBChB, PhD, Theresa McDonagh MD, Francis Murgatroyd MA, FRCP, Paul A. Scott DM, FRCP","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The most effective way to treat patients following a first ICD therapy is unclear. We hypothesised that following first ICD therapy, combining different treatment strategies would be associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy compared to single strategies alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at King's College Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. We assessed the use of 7 specific treatment strategies, introduced after the 1st therapy—start/increase the dose of beta-blockers, prognostic heart failure medications, antiarrhythmic drugs as well as ICD reprogramming, ablation, ICD upgrade/revision and coronary revascularisation. We evaluated the association between these treatment strategies and the risk of a subsequent ICD therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a mean 50 months follow-up, 267 patients experienced 1st ICD therapy (212 appropriate and 55 inappropriate). Combining treatment strategies was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy for appropriate therapy compared to 0/7 strategies (1st appropriate ICD therapy, 1/7 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 80), 43% lower risk and ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 73) 58% reduction, <i>p</i> = <.001). This was also true for inappropriate therapy (1st inappropriate therapy, 1 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 22) 86% lower risk and ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 25), 94% reduction, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to patients with 0/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 8).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An approach combining treatment strategies may be more effective than using single strategies alone to prevent subsequent therapy in patients presenting following a 1st ICD therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of patients following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy—The importance of a multifaceted approach\",\"authors\":\"Karshana Selvarajah MSc, Parisha Khan MSc, Nishat Jahagirdar Pgdip, Antonio Cannatà MD, Rahul Mukherjee MBBS, PhD, Daniel I. Bromage MBChB, PhD, Theresa McDonagh MD, Francis Murgatroyd MA, FRCP, Paul A. Scott DM, FRCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.13204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most effective way to treat patients following a first ICD therapy is unclear. We hypothesised that following first ICD therapy, combining different treatment strategies would be associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy compared to single strategies alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at King's College Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. We assessed the use of 7 specific treatment strategies, introduced after the 1st therapy—start/increase the dose of beta-blockers, prognostic heart failure medications, antiarrhythmic drugs as well as ICD reprogramming, ablation, ICD upgrade/revision and coronary revascularisation. We evaluated the association between these treatment strategies and the risk of a subsequent ICD therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During a mean 50 months follow-up, 267 patients experienced 1st ICD therapy (212 appropriate and 55 inappropriate). Combining treatment strategies was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy for appropriate therapy compared to 0/7 strategies (1st appropriate ICD therapy, 1/7 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 80), 43% lower risk and ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 73) 58% reduction, <i>p</i> = <.001). This was also true for inappropriate therapy (1st inappropriate therapy, 1 treatment strategy (<i>n</i> = 22) 86% lower risk and ≥2/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 25), 94% reduction, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to patients with 0/7 treatment strategies (<i>n</i> = 8).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>An approach combining treatment strategies may be more effective than using single strategies alone to prevent subsequent therapy in patients presenting following a 1st ICD therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:首次ICD治疗后最有效的治疗方法尚不清楚。我们假设,在第一次ICD治疗后,与单独治疗相比,结合不同的治疗策略可以降低后续治疗的风险。方法:收集2009年1月至2019年12月在国王学院医院连续接受ICD植入的患者的数据。我们评估了7种特定治疗策略的使用情况,这些策略是在第一次治疗后引入的-受体阻滞剂、预后心力衰竭药物、抗心律失常药物以及ICD重编程、消融、ICD升级/翻修和冠状动脉血运重建。我们评估了这些治疗策略与后续ICD治疗风险之间的关系。结果:在平均50个月的随访中,267例患者接受了首次ICD治疗(212例合适,55例不合适)。与0/7策略相比,联合治疗策略与适当治疗的后续治疗风险显著降低相关(第一次适当的ICD治疗,1/7治疗策略(n = 80),风险降低43%;≥2/7治疗策略(n = 73),风险降低58%,p = n = 22);≥2/7治疗策略(n = 25),风险降低94%,p n = 8)。结论:对于首次ICD治疗后出现的患者,联合治疗策略可能比单独使用单一策略更有效地预防后续治疗。
Management of patients following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy—The importance of a multifaceted approach
Background
The most effective way to treat patients following a first ICD therapy is unclear. We hypothesised that following first ICD therapy, combining different treatment strategies would be associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy compared to single strategies alone.
Methods
Data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at King's College Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. We assessed the use of 7 specific treatment strategies, introduced after the 1st therapy—start/increase the dose of beta-blockers, prognostic heart failure medications, antiarrhythmic drugs as well as ICD reprogramming, ablation, ICD upgrade/revision and coronary revascularisation. We evaluated the association between these treatment strategies and the risk of a subsequent ICD therapy.
Results
During a mean 50 months follow-up, 267 patients experienced 1st ICD therapy (212 appropriate and 55 inappropriate). Combining treatment strategies was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent therapy for appropriate therapy compared to 0/7 strategies (1st appropriate ICD therapy, 1/7 treatment strategy (n = 80), 43% lower risk and ≥2/7 treatment strategies (n = 73) 58% reduction, p = <.001). This was also true for inappropriate therapy (1st inappropriate therapy, 1 treatment strategy (n = 22) 86% lower risk and ≥2/7 treatment strategies (n = 25), 94% reduction, p < 0.001) compared to patients with 0/7 treatment strategies (n = 8).
Conclusion
An approach combining treatment strategies may be more effective than using single strategies alone to prevent subsequent therapy in patients presenting following a 1st ICD therapy.