Tommi Bergman, Maija-Liisa Kalliomäki, Mika Särkelä, Jarkko Harju
{"title":"应用手术体积指数指导胃肠外科手术麻醉:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Tommi Bergman, Maija-Liisa Kalliomäki, Mika Särkelä, Jarkko Harju","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01262-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement of nociception and the optimisation of intraoperative antinociceptive medication could potentially improve the conduct of anaesthesia, especially in the older population. The Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) is one of the monitoring methods presently used for the detection of nociceptive stimulus. Eighty patients aged 50 years and older who were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery were randomised and divided into a study group and a control group. In the study group, the SPI was used to guide the administration of remifentanil during surgery. In the control group, the SPI value was concealed, and remifentanil administration was based on the clinical evaluation of the attending anaesthesiologist. The primary endpoint of this study was intraoperative remifentanil consumption. In addition, we compared the durations of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension. No difference in intraoperative remifentanil consumption (4.5 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup> vs. 5.6 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup>, p = 0.14) was found. Furthermore, there was no difference in the proportion of hypotensive time (mean arterial pressure, MAP < 65) (3.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.40). However, in the subgroup of patients who underwent operation with invasive blood pressure monitoring, there was less severe hypotension (MAP < 55) (0.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02) and intermediate hypotension (MAP < 65) (10.2% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07) in the treatment group, even though remifentanil consumption was higher (3.5 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup> vs. 5.1 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup>p = 0.03). The use of SPI guidance for the administration of remifentanil during surgery did not help to reduce the remifentanil consumption. However, the results from invasively monitored study group suggest more timely administered opioid when SPI was used.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of the surgical pleth index to guide anaesthesia in gastroenterological surgery: a randomised controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Tommi Bergman, Maija-Liisa Kalliomäki, Mika Särkelä, Jarkko Harju\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-025-01262-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The measurement of nociception and the optimisation of intraoperative antinociceptive medication could potentially improve the conduct of anaesthesia, especially in the older population. The Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) is one of the monitoring methods presently used for the detection of nociceptive stimulus. Eighty patients aged 50 years and older who were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery were randomised and divided into a study group and a control group. In the study group, the SPI was used to guide the administration of remifentanil during surgery. In the control group, the SPI value was concealed, and remifentanil administration was based on the clinical evaluation of the attending anaesthesiologist. The primary endpoint of this study was intraoperative remifentanil consumption. In addition, we compared the durations of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension. No difference in intraoperative remifentanil consumption (4.5 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup> vs. 5.6 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup>, p = 0.14) was found. Furthermore, there was no difference in the proportion of hypotensive time (mean arterial pressure, MAP < 65) (3.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.40). However, in the subgroup of patients who underwent operation with invasive blood pressure monitoring, there was less severe hypotension (MAP < 55) (0.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02) and intermediate hypotension (MAP < 65) (10.2% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07) in the treatment group, even though remifentanil consumption was higher (3.5 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup> vs. 5.1 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup>p = 0.03). The use of SPI guidance for the administration of remifentanil during surgery did not help to reduce the remifentanil consumption. However, the results from invasively monitored study group suggest more timely administered opioid when SPI was used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01262-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01262-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
痛觉的测量和术中抗痛觉药物的优化可能潜在地改善麻醉的行为,特别是在老年人群中。手术体积指数(SPI)是目前用于检测伤害性刺激的监测方法之一。80例50岁及以上计划接受腹部大手术的患者被随机分为研究组和对照组。在研究组中,SPI用于指导手术期间瑞芬太尼的给药。对照组隐匿SPI值,瑞芬太尼的给药依据麻醉主治医师的临床评价。这项研究的主要终点是术中瑞芬太尼的消耗。此外,我们比较了术中低血压和高血压的持续时间。术中瑞芬太尼用量无差异(4.5µg kg- 1h- 1 vs 5.6µg kg- 1h- 1, p = 0.14)。此外,降压时间的比例也没有差异(平均动脉压,MAP - 1h- 1 vs. 5.1µg kg- 1h- 1p = 0.03)。在手术中使用SPI指导瑞芬太尼的给药并不能帮助减少瑞芬太尼的用量。然而,有创监测研究组的结果表明,当使用SPI时,更及时地给予阿片类药物。
The use of the surgical pleth index to guide anaesthesia in gastroenterological surgery: a randomised controlled study.
The measurement of nociception and the optimisation of intraoperative antinociceptive medication could potentially improve the conduct of anaesthesia, especially in the older population. The Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) is one of the monitoring methods presently used for the detection of nociceptive stimulus. Eighty patients aged 50 years and older who were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery were randomised and divided into a study group and a control group. In the study group, the SPI was used to guide the administration of remifentanil during surgery. In the control group, the SPI value was concealed, and remifentanil administration was based on the clinical evaluation of the attending anaesthesiologist. The primary endpoint of this study was intraoperative remifentanil consumption. In addition, we compared the durations of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension. No difference in intraoperative remifentanil consumption (4.5 µg kg- 1h- 1 vs. 5.6 µg kg- 1h- 1, p = 0.14) was found. Furthermore, there was no difference in the proportion of hypotensive time (mean arterial pressure, MAP < 65) (3.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.40). However, in the subgroup of patients who underwent operation with invasive blood pressure monitoring, there was less severe hypotension (MAP < 55) (0.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02) and intermediate hypotension (MAP < 65) (10.2% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07) in the treatment group, even though remifentanil consumption was higher (3.5 µg kg- 1h- 1 vs. 5.1 µg kg- 1h- 1p = 0.03). The use of SPI guidance for the administration of remifentanil during surgery did not help to reduce the remifentanil consumption. However, the results from invasively monitored study group suggest more timely administered opioid when SPI was used.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.